feat(portfolio): fold in RAILIANCE-WP-0016 apps-pg evidence
First delegated evidence from RESOURCE-WP-0003-T04 to land. railiance-platform delivered apps-pg capacity, utilization, consumers, and the apps-pg-dbbytes-v1 allocation driver, and correctly delivered no EUR. - data/resources/apps-pg.json: real capacity; allocation unattributed -> shared under apps-pg-dbbytes-v1; second consumer vergabe-teilnahme registered - data/control-cycle/apps-pg-2026-09-base.json: first operational control-cycle record in the repository - examples/control-cycle/apps-pg-*.json retired; the invented fixture collided with the real record's identifier - data/portfolio-coverage-2026-08-14.json: gap marked delivered with three residual unknowns still open The real evidence exposed a design gap in the T05 schema: v0.1 required a number for every cost field, so recording genuine usage without a booked cost meant inventing one. Schema 0.2 permits null costs, null unattributed_eur, a technical unattributed_share, and null measurements. Null is unknown, never zero; an unknown component makes the total null rather than the sum of the known parts; and the comparator classifies unknown amounts as data_quality instead of computing a variance. Existing 0.1 records are not rewritten. apps-pg is now measured (idle at 5.8% of volume) and attributed, and remains unpriced: delivered technical evidence does not create a booked cost. 86 tests pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b64b5683df
commit
17de8b831e
16 changed files with 908 additions and 71 deletions
|
|
@ -44,16 +44,30 @@ def main() -> int:
|
|||
for resource in resources:
|
||||
assert not required - resource.keys(), f"missing fields: {required - resource.keys()}"
|
||||
validate_record(resource)
|
||||
operational_records = [load(str(path)) for path in Path("data/control-cycle").glob("*.json")]
|
||||
control_records += operational_records
|
||||
record_ids = {record["record_id"] for record in control_records}
|
||||
assert len(record_ids) == len(control_records)
|
||||
assert {record["resource_class"] for record in control_records} == {"storage", "cluster_compute", "shared_platform_service"}
|
||||
assert {record["resource_class"] for record in control_records} >= {"storage", "cluster_compute", "shared_platform_service"}
|
||||
for record in control_records:
|
||||
assert record["schema_version"] == "0.1"
|
||||
assert record["schema_version"] in {"0.1", "0.2"}
|
||||
assert record["resource_id"].startswith("resource:")
|
||||
costs = record["costs"]
|
||||
assert costs["total"] == round(costs["infrastructure"] + costs["internal_labor"] + costs["external_labor"], 2)
|
||||
components = [costs["infrastructure"], costs["internal_labor"], costs["external_labor"]]
|
||||
if any(component is None for component in components):
|
||||
# An unknown component makes the total unknown; it is never the sum
|
||||
# of the parts that happen to be known.
|
||||
assert record["schema_version"] == "0.2", "null costs require schema 0.2"
|
||||
assert costs["total"] is None
|
||||
else:
|
||||
assert costs["total"] == round(sum(components), 2)
|
||||
if record["record_type"] == "actual":
|
||||
assert record["forecast_ref"] in record_ids
|
||||
# Operational records assert real facts and must cite the authoritative
|
||||
# repository evidence they came from.
|
||||
for record in operational_records:
|
||||
assert record["evidence"], f"{record['record_id']} cites no evidence"
|
||||
assert record["uncertainty"]["notes"], f"{record['record_id']} states no uncertainty"
|
||||
case_schema = load("schemas/optimization-case.schema.json")
|
||||
assert case_schema["$schema"].endswith("2020-12/schema")
|
||||
assert case_schema["properties"]["schema_version"]["const"] == "0.1"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue