Seed resource control and backup procurement plan
This commit is contained in:
parent
184ecede67
commit
f0f60416ab
7 changed files with 458 additions and 0 deletions
87
INTENT.md
Normal file
87
INTENT.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
|
|||
# INTENT — resource-control
|
||||
|
||||
## Why this repository exists
|
||||
|
||||
Railiance consumes compute, storage, network, and managed services from
|
||||
external providers. Those resources create recurring cost, operational
|
||||
dependencies, capacity limits, and switching decisions that cannot be managed
|
||||
reliably from invoices, provider consoles, or deployment repositories alone.
|
||||
|
||||
`resource-control` is the control plane for that portfolio. It records what we
|
||||
consume, why we consume it, who owns it, what it costs, how fully it is used,
|
||||
and which procurement alternatives could provide a better combination of
|
||||
cost, resilience, sovereignty, and operational fit.
|
||||
|
||||
The initial provider set is:
|
||||
|
||||
- **A — Host Europe**
|
||||
- **B — Scaleway**
|
||||
- **C — Hetzner**
|
||||
|
||||
The set is a comparison baseline, not a permanent allow-list. Adding a
|
||||
provider requires evidence; retaining one requires continuing value.
|
||||
|
||||
## What it owns
|
||||
|
||||
- A provider-neutral inventory of purchased and proposed resources.
|
||||
- Resource identity, provider, region, service class, capacity, lifecycle,
|
||||
contract term, renewal/cancellation window, owner, workload, environment,
|
||||
and cost-attribution key.
|
||||
- Normalized recurring and usage-based cost, including storage, ingress,
|
||||
egress, requests, support, taxes, minimum commitments, and switching cost.
|
||||
- Demand forecasts and procurement research for new compute and storage.
|
||||
- Utilization and saturation evidence linked to each resource.
|
||||
- Budget-versus-actual reporting inputs for `fin-hub`.
|
||||
- Periodic rightsizing, consolidation, commitment, migration, and provider
|
||||
switching recommendations.
|
||||
- Decision records and exit plans for material provider commitments.
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship with fin-hub
|
||||
|
||||
`resource-control` answers **what concrete resources are bought, used, and
|
||||
replaceable**. `fin-hub` answers **what the federation can afford, what its burn
|
||||
rate and runway are, and when resource pressure must change priorities**.
|
||||
|
||||
This repo publishes normalized inventory, allocation, forecast, and realized
|
||||
cost evidence to fin-hub. It does not create a competing budget ledger or
|
||||
financial allocator.
|
||||
|
||||
## Operating principles
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Provider-neutral requirements first.** Define durability, recovery,
|
||||
residency, performance, capacity, and exit requirements before comparing
|
||||
product names.
|
||||
2. **Total cost, not headline price.** Include traffic, requests, minimum
|
||||
charges, tax, support, labor, migration, and recovery-test cost.
|
||||
3. **No unowned spend.** Every resource has an accountable owner, workload,
|
||||
environment, purpose, and cost-attribution key.
|
||||
4. **No untested resilience claims.** Backup resources are accepted only after
|
||||
a restore; compute failover is accepted only after a failover exercise.
|
||||
5. **Exit is part of procurement.** Record data export, migration path,
|
||||
cancellation window, and credential revocation before commitment.
|
||||
6. **Avoid correlated failure silently.** Same-provider placement may be
|
||||
intentional, but the shared failure domain and compensating control must be
|
||||
explicit.
|
||||
7. **Measure before optimizing.** Recommendations distinguish observed
|
||||
utilization from estimates and assumptions.
|
||||
8. **Credentials stay elsewhere.** Provider keys and billing credentials live
|
||||
in the approved OpenBao/credential-broker lanes, never in this repository.
|
||||
|
||||
## What it does not own
|
||||
|
||||
- Budget authority, runway policy, or financial transactions (`fin-hub` and
|
||||
human financial authority).
|
||||
- Workload manifests and service-specific backup procedures (owning `rapp-*`
|
||||
or workload repositories).
|
||||
- Provider credentials or payment instruments.
|
||||
- Cluster-wide deployment governance (`railiance-platform`).
|
||||
- Application data retention policy, except to verify that procured resources
|
||||
can satisfy it.
|
||||
|
||||
## Initial outcome
|
||||
|
||||
Procure and operationalize off-host object storage for `rapp-postgres`
|
||||
continuous WAL archiving and physical base backups, while retaining a separate
|
||||
logical-backup copy. The chosen resource must support a verified full restore
|
||||
and point-in-time recovery, expose its real monthly cost and utilization to
|
||||
fin-hub, and retain a tested provider-exit path.
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue