Record all three rulings; RISK-WP-0003 finished
Escalation rule adopted as written. RISK-F-0008 accepted with the legal policy set as the compensating control. Canon kinds packet sent to the-custodian, with note offered lifecycle-free and verifications deliberately withheld as an unsettled species. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
674bd41635
commit
02a17e601d
3 changed files with 57 additions and 5 deletions
|
|
@ -8,13 +8,13 @@
|
|||
|
||||
| Kind | ID | Status | Lane | Source |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| workplan | RISK-WP-0001 | active | — | workplans/RISK-WP-0001-make-the-register-decidable.md |
|
||||
| workplan | RISK-WP-0001 | finished | — | workplans/RISK-WP-0001-make-the-register-decidable.md |
|
||||
| workplan | RISK-WP-0002 | active | — | workplans/RISK-WP-0002-publication-handover.md |
|
||||
| workplan | RISK-WP-0003 | blocked | — | workplans/RISK-WP-0003-regulatory-intake.md |
|
||||
| workplan | RISK-WP-0004 | finished | — | workplans/RISK-WP-0004-run-the-register.md |
|
||||
| task | RISK-WP-0001-T01 | done | — | workplans/RISK-WP-0001-make-the-register-decidable.md |
|
||||
| task | RISK-WP-0001-T02 | done | — | workplans/RISK-WP-0001-make-the-register-decidable.md |
|
||||
| task | RISK-WP-0001-T03 | progress | — | workplans/RISK-WP-0001-make-the-register-decidable.md |
|
||||
| task | RISK-WP-0001-T03 | done | — | workplans/RISK-WP-0001-make-the-register-decidable.md |
|
||||
| task | RISK-WP-0001-T04 | done | — | workplans/RISK-WP-0001-make-the-register-decidable.md |
|
||||
| task | RISK-WP-0001-T05 | done | — | workplans/RISK-WP-0001-make-the-register-decidable.md |
|
||||
| task | RISK-WP-0001-T06 | done | — | workplans/RISK-WP-0001-make-the-register-decidable.md |
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -67,3 +67,51 @@ depends on it.
|
|||
(`POLICY-NEXUS-WP-0001`). Paths proposed here are proposals.
|
||||
- **Whether anything else ever publishes.** Rulings, verifications and
|
||||
regulatory records are unaddressed and stay internal until someone asks.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Later the same day — three more rulings
|
||||
|
||||
## The escalation rule is adopted, as written
|
||||
|
||||
`docs/method/escalation.md`, `status: adopted`, thresholds included. €50/month
|
||||
recurring and €500 one-off are now the operator's numbers.
|
||||
|
||||
It had governed four escalations while still a draft. That was the state
|
||||
`RISK-WP-0001-T03` refused to leave open, and the wait carried the register's
|
||||
most uncomfortable default — unadopted by 2026-09-17 would have meant recording
|
||||
it as *de facto in force but unratified*, said on the face of every escalation
|
||||
sent under it.
|
||||
|
||||
## No external legal determination while building — and a policy set instead
|
||||
|
||||
`RISK-F-0008` moves to `accepted`. The estate will not buy advice in build
|
||||
mode; `RISK-REG-0001` stands as the recorded position. The three triggers
|
||||
survive as what **ends** the acceptance rather than what starts a purchase.
|
||||
|
||||
The direction that came with it is the substantive part: **define and keep a set
|
||||
of legal policies for reuse**, because work contexts will need specific
|
||||
positions in place and should retrieve them rather than research them.
|
||||
|
||||
`docs/regulatory/policies/` holds thirteen, keyed by **activation condition**
|
||||
rather than by regime, so a context pulls a slice — a first real user account
|
||||
pulls six; a consumer product in Germany pulls those plus accessibility.
|
||||
|
||||
Two turned out to be **already active and unowned**: commercial and tax
|
||||
retention, and the e-invoicing receiving obligation live since 2025 with no
|
||||
named receiving point in the estate. That is the catalogue justifying itself in
|
||||
its first hour, and it is exactly the failure `INTENT.md` describes — regulation
|
||||
consulted once and discarded, with nobody noticing what had quietly become
|
||||
true.
|
||||
|
||||
## Register the canon kinds
|
||||
|
||||
`finding`, `regulatory-record` and `note` go to canon as work-record kinds. The
|
||||
packet is with `the-custodian`; canon is theirs and this repo does not edit it.
|
||||
|
||||
**The reason is not the C-31 warning.** No repo can currently ask the hub what
|
||||
findings are open against it, and that capability gap was simply showing up as
|
||||
a warning. `note` is offered with no lifecycle at all — a note is not work and
|
||||
does not progress — and with an explicit invitation to reject it rather than
|
||||
give it a fake one. Verifications were deliberately left out: two records and a
|
||||
week-old shape is not a settled species.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ type: workplan
|
|||
title: "Make regulatory intake a working remit rather than one record"
|
||||
domain: infotech
|
||||
repo: risk-nexus
|
||||
status: blocked
|
||||
status: finished
|
||||
owner: the-custodian
|
||||
topic_slug: risk-nexus
|
||||
created: "2026-08-20"
|
||||
|
|
@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ From `RISK-REG-0001` and `RISK-F-0008`, both already written down:
|
|||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: RISK-WP-0003-T01
|
||||
status: wait
|
||||
status: done
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -59,7 +59,11 @@ Custodian decision. Cheap, and it is what stops the estate either buying advice
|
|||
it does not need or discovering it needed it. Until it is ruled, `RISK-F-0008`
|
||||
stays escalated as `partially-answered`.
|
||||
|
||||
Waiting 2026-08-20, typed rather than open-ended (`docs/method/dependencies.md`): the custodian rules the trigger list, and if nothing arrives by 2026-11-17 the register records the assumption **as an assumption**, which is honest and is not an answer. Carried on `RISK-F-0008`.
|
||||
Completed 2026-08-20. Ruled: **no external determination while building.** The three triggers survive, not as what starts a purchase but as what ends the acceptance — `RISK-F-0008` moves to `accepted` with a named accepter and an end condition rather than sitting `open` on an assumption.
|
||||
|
||||
The ruling came with a direction that turned a deferral into an asset: **define and keep a set of legal policies for reuse**, because work contexts will need specific positions in place and should retrieve them rather than research them. `docs/regulatory/policies/` — thirteen entries keyed by activation condition, with a retrieval table so a context pulls a slice.
|
||||
|
||||
Two entries turned out to be **already active and unowned**: commercial and tax retention (`RISK-POL-0009`) and the e-invoicing receiving obligation (`RISK-POL-0012`), live since 2025 with no system in the estate named as the receiving point. Finding a live obligation in the first hour of writing the catalogue is the argument for the catalogue.
|
||||
|
||||
### T02 — Retention periods per category
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue