Record all three rulings; RISK-WP-0003 finished

Escalation rule adopted as written. RISK-F-0008 accepted with the legal
policy set as the compensating control. Canon kinds packet sent to
the-custodian, with note offered lifecycle-free and verifications
deliberately withheld as an unsettled species.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-08-20 23:37:45 +02:00
parent 674bd41635
commit 02a17e601d
3 changed files with 57 additions and 5 deletions

View file

@ -8,13 +8,13 @@
| Kind | ID | Status | Lane | Source |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| workplan | RISK-WP-0001 | active | — | workplans/RISK-WP-0001-make-the-register-decidable.md |
| workplan | RISK-WP-0001 | finished | — | workplans/RISK-WP-0001-make-the-register-decidable.md |
| workplan | RISK-WP-0002 | active | — | workplans/RISK-WP-0002-publication-handover.md |
| workplan | RISK-WP-0003 | blocked | — | workplans/RISK-WP-0003-regulatory-intake.md |
| workplan | RISK-WP-0004 | finished | — | workplans/RISK-WP-0004-run-the-register.md |
| task | RISK-WP-0001-T01 | done | — | workplans/RISK-WP-0001-make-the-register-decidable.md |
| task | RISK-WP-0001-T02 | done | — | workplans/RISK-WP-0001-make-the-register-decidable.md |
| task | RISK-WP-0001-T03 | progress | — | workplans/RISK-WP-0001-make-the-register-decidable.md |
| task | RISK-WP-0001-T03 | done | — | workplans/RISK-WP-0001-make-the-register-decidable.md |
| task | RISK-WP-0001-T04 | done | — | workplans/RISK-WP-0001-make-the-register-decidable.md |
| task | RISK-WP-0001-T05 | done | — | workplans/RISK-WP-0001-make-the-register-decidable.md |
| task | RISK-WP-0001-T06 | done | — | workplans/RISK-WP-0001-make-the-register-decidable.md |

View file

@ -67,3 +67,51 @@ depends on it.
(`POLICY-NEXUS-WP-0001`). Paths proposed here are proposals.
- **Whether anything else ever publishes.** Rulings, verifications and
regulatory records are unaddressed and stay internal until someone asks.
---
# Later the same day — three more rulings
## The escalation rule is adopted, as written
`docs/method/escalation.md`, `status: adopted`, thresholds included. €50/month
recurring and €500 one-off are now the operator's numbers.
It had governed four escalations while still a draft. That was the state
`RISK-WP-0001-T03` refused to leave open, and the wait carried the register's
most uncomfortable default — unadopted by 2026-09-17 would have meant recording
it as *de facto in force but unratified*, said on the face of every escalation
sent under it.
## No external legal determination while building — and a policy set instead
`RISK-F-0008` moves to `accepted`. The estate will not buy advice in build
mode; `RISK-REG-0001` stands as the recorded position. The three triggers
survive as what **ends** the acceptance rather than what starts a purchase.
The direction that came with it is the substantive part: **define and keep a set
of legal policies for reuse**, because work contexts will need specific
positions in place and should retrieve them rather than research them.
`docs/regulatory/policies/` holds thirteen, keyed by **activation condition**
rather than by regime, so a context pulls a slice — a first real user account
pulls six; a consumer product in Germany pulls those plus accessibility.
Two turned out to be **already active and unowned**: commercial and tax
retention, and the e-invoicing receiving obligation live since 2025 with no
named receiving point in the estate. That is the catalogue justifying itself in
its first hour, and it is exactly the failure `INTENT.md` describes — regulation
consulted once and discarded, with nobody noticing what had quietly become
true.
## Register the canon kinds
`finding`, `regulatory-record` and `note` go to canon as work-record kinds. The
packet is with `the-custodian`; canon is theirs and this repo does not edit it.
**The reason is not the C-31 warning.** No repo can currently ask the hub what
findings are open against it, and that capability gap was simply showing up as
a warning. `note` is offered with no lifecycle at all — a note is not work and
does not progress — and with an explicit invitation to reject it rather than
give it a fake one. Verifications were deliberately left out: two records and a
week-old shape is not a settled species.

View file

@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ type: workplan
title: "Make regulatory intake a working remit rather than one record"
domain: infotech
repo: risk-nexus
status: blocked
status: finished
owner: the-custodian
topic_slug: risk-nexus
created: "2026-08-20"
@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ From `RISK-REG-0001` and `RISK-F-0008`, both already written down:
```task
id: RISK-WP-0003-T01
status: wait
status: done
priority: high
```
@ -59,7 +59,11 @@ Custodian decision. Cheap, and it is what stops the estate either buying advice
it does not need or discovering it needed it. Until it is ruled, `RISK-F-0008`
stays escalated as `partially-answered`.
Waiting 2026-08-20, typed rather than open-ended (`docs/method/dependencies.md`): the custodian rules the trigger list, and if nothing arrives by 2026-11-17 the register records the assumption **as an assumption**, which is honest and is not an answer. Carried on `RISK-F-0008`.
Completed 2026-08-20. Ruled: **no external determination while building.** The three triggers survive, not as what starts a purchase but as what ends the acceptance — `RISK-F-0008` moves to `accepted` with a named accepter and an end condition rather than sitting `open` on an assumption.
The ruling came with a direction that turned a deferral into an asset: **define and keep a set of legal policies for reuse**, because work contexts will need specific positions in place and should retrieve them rather than research them. `docs/regulatory/policies/` — thirteen entries keyed by activation condition, with a retrieval table so a context pulls a slice.
Two entries turned out to be **already active and unowned**: commercial and tax retention (`RISK-POL-0009`) and the e-invoicing receiving obligation (`RISK-POL-0012`), live since 2025 with no system in the estate named as the receiving point. Finding a live obligation in the first hour of writing the catalogue is the argument for the catalogue.
### T02 — Retention periods per category