Waits attach to any record, not just findings
Adopting a rule is nobody's finding; neither is registering a canon kind or publishing a document. Each obligation that lived outside the mechanism was invisible to it. RISK-WP-0001 now carries both of its custodian waits, and the escalation-rule one has the register's most uncomfortable default pointed inward: unadopted by 2026-09-17 means recorded as de facto in force but unratified, said on the face of every escalation sent under it. A draft that quietly governs is exactly what this register exists to notice. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9a22a2adc5
commit
3a0ba5d427
6 changed files with 54 additions and 8 deletions
|
|
@ -8,7 +8,20 @@ status: active
|
|||
owner: the-custodian
|
||||
topic_slug: risk-nexus
|
||||
created: "2026-08-19"
|
||||
updated: "2026-08-19"
|
||||
updated: "2026-08-20"
|
||||
waiting_on:
|
||||
- who: the-custodian
|
||||
what: "adopt docs/method/escalation.md, which is producing decisions while still status: proposed"
|
||||
since: "2026-08-19"
|
||||
would_change: "the rule stops being a draft that looks like coverage; the spend thresholds become the operator's numbers rather than ours"
|
||||
default: "recorded as de facto in force but unratified, and every escalation sent under it says so on its face"
|
||||
default_at: "2026-09-17"
|
||||
- who: the-custodian
|
||||
what: "register finding / note / regulatory-record as canon work-record kinds, or rule that the register is a different ontology"
|
||||
since: "2026-08-20"
|
||||
would_change: "C-31 stops being a standing warning; the estate's work-record backbone gains four species it currently cannot name"
|
||||
default: "C-31 documented as expected noise for this repo, and the register stops treating it as a gap it can close"
|
||||
default_at: "2026-09-17"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# RISK-WP-0001 — make the register decidable
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue