File and grade Emergent knowledge and Claude routing findings
Assistant: codex Assistant-Model: gpt-6.1-sol Assistant-Session: 01a102b3-d324-7ee3-a57a-702b4ae6a39b
This commit is contained in:
parent
0b3cfb81c6
commit
55af2d09d5
4 changed files with 367 additions and 3 deletions
|
|
@ -1,18 +1,21 @@
|
|||
# Register
|
||||
|
||||
Generated by `tools/register_index.py` from `findings/`. Do not edit by hand. Last built 2026-09-22.
|
||||
Generated by `tools/register_index.py` from `findings/`. Do not edit by hand. Last built 2026-10-03.
|
||||
|
||||
3 live of 12 findings; 3 notes below the floor.
|
||||
6 live of 15 findings; 3 notes below the floor.
|
||||
|
||||
## Findings
|
||||
|
||||
| ID | Finding | System | Severity | Disclosure | Escalation | Fix owner | Status | Cadence | Next check |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| [RISK-F-0015](findings/RISK-F-0015-emergent-claude-owner-routing.md) | Retained Claude 0.2.1 answers misroute model-switch and zones questions | emergent-security | low | public | none | emergent-security | open | instant (0) | **due** |
|
||||
| [RISK-F-0014](findings/RISK-F-0014-emergent-loaded-withdrawal-snapshot.md) | Loaded Emergent 0.2.1 continues serving a source after withdrawal and reseal | emergent-security | low | public | none | emergent-security | open | instant (0) | **due** |
|
||||
| [RISK-F-0013](findings/RISK-F-0013-emergent-unsealed-card-receipt.md) | Loaded Emergent 0.2.1 returns unsealed card bytes under the reviewed digest | emergent-security | medium | public | none | emergent-security | open | instant (0) | **due** |
|
||||
| [RISK-F-0012](findings/RISK-F-0012-e-invoice-receipt-and-retention.md) | The estate cannot show it receives and retains EN 16931 e-invoices | qonto-assistant | medium | public | none | qonto-assistant | open | instant (0) | **due** |
|
||||
| [RISK-F-0011](findings/RISK-F-0011-qonto-audit-deny-stream-completeness.md) | qonto-assistant audit.deny stream completeness is not established | qonto-assistant | medium | public | **pending** (t5, sent) | qonto-assistant | open | instant (0) | **due** |
|
||||
| [RISK-F-0010](findings/RISK-F-0010-embedded-backup-webdav-credential.md) | Forgejo backup source embeds a WebDAV credential default | railiance-platform | low | public | none | railiance-platform | fixed | 1h (1) | **due** |
|
||||
| [RISK-F-0009](findings/RISK-F-0009-openbao-deny-set-covers-a-third-of-high-risk-lanes.md) | agent-high-risk-boundary denies 6 of 17 high-risk lanes; the direct bao path is unprotected for the rest | railiance-platform | **high** | public | none | railiance-platform | fixed | instant (0) | **due** |
|
||||
| [RISK-F-0008](findings/RISK-F-0008-audit-retention-legal-basis-assumed.md) | The legal basis for retaining audit facts against an erasure request has been assumed, never established | audit-core | medium | public | **answered** (t2, answered) | risk-nexus | accepted | 8h (2) | 2026-09-22 14:13Z |
|
||||
| [RISK-F-0008](findings/RISK-F-0008-audit-retention-legal-basis-assumed.md) | The legal basis for retaining audit facts against an erasure request has been assumed, never established | audit-core | medium | public | **answered** (t2, answered) | risk-nexus | accepted | 8h (2) | **due** |
|
||||
| [RISK-F-0007](findings/RISK-F-0007-unverified-tenant-boundary.md) | No consumer's tenant boundary is verified anywhere | estate | **high** | public | **answered** (t4, assigned) | per-consumer, on request | fixed | instant (0) | **due** |
|
||||
| [RISK-F-0006](findings/RISK-F-0006-apps-pg-no-backup-configured.md) | apps-pg has no backup configured at all: R0 means no recovery | railiance-platform | **high** | public | **answered** (t3, answered) | railiance-platform | fixed | instant (0) | **due** |
|
||||
| [RISK-F-0005](findings/RISK-F-0005-audit-core-unfiltered-read-path.md) | audit-core read path applies no tenant filter; the bound is deployment, not code | audit-core | medium | public | none | audit-core | fixed | instant (0) | **due** |
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
122
findings/RISK-F-0013-emergent-unsealed-card-receipt.md
Normal file
122
findings/RISK-F-0013-emergent-unsealed-card-receipt.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
id: RISK-F-0013
|
||||
type: finding
|
||||
title: "Loaded Emergent 0.2.1 returns unsealed card bytes under the reviewed digest"
|
||||
status: open
|
||||
owner: risk-nexus
|
||||
reported_by: whitehat-security
|
||||
date_reported: "2026-10-03"
|
||||
date_filed: "2026-10-03"
|
||||
system: emergent-security
|
||||
environment: build
|
||||
fix_owner: emergent-security
|
||||
reporter_reference: "WH-KNOW-001"
|
||||
correlation: WHITEHAT-WP-0009-T03
|
||||
fix_tracking: EMERGENT-WP-0002-T04
|
||||
related: [RISK-F-0014, RISK-F-0015]
|
||||
closure_condition: "EMERGENT-WP-0002-T07 accepts exact-digest remediation and review independence limits, with supported release use recorded"
|
||||
severity: medium
|
||||
severity_at_production: medium
|
||||
impact: I2
|
||||
likelihood: L2
|
||||
fidelity_modifier: true
|
||||
production_rescore: false
|
||||
disclosure: public
|
||||
escalation: none
|
||||
last_checked: "2026-10-03T17:02:41Z"
|
||||
next_check: "2026-10-03T17:02:41Z"
|
||||
cadence: instant
|
||||
clean_streak: 0
|
||||
checked_by: "codex/risk-nexus"
|
||||
graded_by: risk-nexus
|
||||
ruling: "RISK-F-0013 register ruling 2026-10-03"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# RISK-F-0013
|
||||
|
||||
## What is true
|
||||
|
||||
On 0.2.1, constructing `Knowledge(bundle)`, changing a card and retrieving it
|
||||
returned the replacement bytes with the original reviewed package digest.
|
||||
Construction rejected a card changed beforehand. This is a validation/read
|
||||
binding defect, not a grant of write access or effect authority.
|
||||
|
||||
It requires write access to the trusted bundle during use of an already loaded
|
||||
object, or a concurrent change between validation and read. The report did not
|
||||
test race timing or provider susceptibility. Fresh CLI construction narrows the
|
||||
window; it does not bind the exact bytes returned.
|
||||
|
||||
On local 0.2.3 the same after-load mutation raised
|
||||
`release content changed; review and reseal` and returned no bytes. The
|
||||
original 0.2.1 pin continued to reproduce the defect. Owner T04 records the
|
||||
implementation as done; T07 still owns remediation and independence acceptance.
|
||||
|
||||
## Register ruling — 2026-10-03
|
||||
|
||||
Provisional carried-defect grade: **medium**, `I2` × `L2` with the fidelity
|
||||
modifier raising effective impact to `I3`. The same grade applies at production
|
||||
on the stated prerequisites; no wider reach or estate-wide effect is assumed.
|
||||
`I2` is recoverable corruption of one knowledge reader's input. The receipt
|
||||
falsely binds unreviewed bytes to a reviewed release, so the fidelity modifier
|
||||
applies. `L2` requires a separate bundle-write foothold. Synthetic reproduction
|
||||
is not an incident and does not make reach `L4`.
|
||||
|
||||
This grade records the still-open 0.2.1 defect pending owner disposition. It
|
||||
makes no claim that 0.2.3 returns unsealed content or that 0.2.1 is deployed.
|
||||
The retest reduces the evidence of current exposure; it is recorded explicitly
|
||||
rather than silently closing the finding. The grade/status changes when T07
|
||||
accepts the exact-digest remediation and establishes the release in use, or
|
||||
new evidence changes the write prerequisite or consequence.
|
||||
|
||||
**Public**, under the bounded build-mode default: the record identifies a
|
||||
local library prerequisite, no live endpoint or additional route to write
|
||||
access. No publication handover is made by this filing. **No escalation**:
|
||||
no real tenant exposure, external obligation, new spend, disputed ownership or
|
||||
fourteen-day stall is established.
|
||||
|
||||
## Owner disposition and closure
|
||||
|
||||
Suggested measure: return an immutable verified snapshot or validate the exact
|
||||
returned bytes, with lifecycle invalidation. Work stays in T04/T07. Closure
|
||||
requires T07's recorded acceptance of remediation for the exact 0.2.3 digest,
|
||||
including the review's independence limit and the scope of release use. Until
|
||||
then this finding remains open; provider, rollout and adoption gates remain
|
||||
separate.
|
||||
|
||||
## Evidence and limits
|
||||
|
||||
Owner tracking read directly:
|
||||
`emergent-security/workplans/EMERGENT-WP-0002-agent-security-knowledge-and-netkingdom-integration.md`:
|
||||
T04 `done`, T07 `wait`, workplan `blocked` on 2026-10-03. The current fix
|
||||
tracker reports these task IDs as `unreadable` because their task blocks place
|
||||
`title` between `id` and `status`; this filing uses the explicit file read,
|
||||
not that parser result as evidence of absent tracking.
|
||||
|
||||
Reporter evidence (read from the sibling checkout):
|
||||
|
||||
- `whitehat-security/evidence/2026-10-03-emergent-021-offline-review.md`
|
||||
- `whitehat-security/evidence/2026-10-03-emergent-023-offline-retest.md`
|
||||
- `whitehat-security/workplans/WHITEHAT-WP-0009-emergent-knowledge-offline-review.md`, Required from risk-nexus
|
||||
- Hub message `9cfdad0d-d531-4387-bf58-78b025dc77a4`; correlation `WHITEHAT-WP-0009-T03`.
|
||||
|
||||
The original release is 0.2.1, commit
|
||||
`f9cba6fb35425f74e34401b1baf09f6057ace493`, package digest
|
||||
`d8ef41bacd2c6551ae3b87628004a5df6943928be1c93eb01e09efc6ad782767`.
|
||||
The local retest is 0.2.3, commit
|
||||
`681144e5d4f59ef00418e7ae776e180b671f5d4d`, package digest
|
||||
`60f8811c6b94b30d357a0d9e5022f2a8ea52e69b47138d3a536755f3295310b5`.
|
||||
These are package identities, not credential material.
|
||||
|
||||
Whitehat used synthetic copied bundles and the local implementation. Its
|
||||
separate authorship shares the implementing session/model/workspace context;
|
||||
it is not a separately authenticated Whitehat principal or institutional
|
||||
assent. Risk-nexus read these records and the owner's existing plan; it did
|
||||
not rerun probes. No live tenant boundary or deployed release was established.
|
||||
A bounded passing retest does not certify the package or close owner T07.
|
||||
The retest's `informed-decision` source-pin drift remains an owner acceptance
|
||||
item; it is not evidence that either defect recurred.
|
||||
|
||||
## Reviews
|
||||
|
||||
- **2026-10-03** — filed and graded from reporter evidence and owner tracking.
|
||||
Initial filing/movement; cadence remains instant, with no clean rung earned.
|
||||
119
findings/RISK-F-0014-emergent-loaded-withdrawal-snapshot.md
Normal file
119
findings/RISK-F-0014-emergent-loaded-withdrawal-snapshot.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
id: RISK-F-0014
|
||||
type: finding
|
||||
title: "Loaded Emergent 0.2.1 continues serving a source after withdrawal and reseal"
|
||||
status: open
|
||||
owner: risk-nexus
|
||||
reported_by: whitehat-security
|
||||
date_reported: "2026-10-03"
|
||||
date_filed: "2026-10-03"
|
||||
system: emergent-security
|
||||
environment: build
|
||||
fix_owner: emergent-security
|
||||
reporter_reference: "WH-KNOW-002"
|
||||
correlation: WHITEHAT-WP-0009-T03
|
||||
fix_tracking: EMERGENT-WP-0002-T04
|
||||
related: [RISK-F-0013, RISK-F-0015]
|
||||
closure_condition: "EMERGENT-WP-0002-T07 accepts exact-digest remediation and review independence limits, with supported release use recorded"
|
||||
severity: low
|
||||
severity_at_production: low
|
||||
impact: I2
|
||||
likelihood: L2
|
||||
fidelity_modifier: false
|
||||
production_rescore: false
|
||||
disclosure: public
|
||||
escalation: none
|
||||
last_checked: "2026-10-03T17:02:41Z"
|
||||
next_check: "2026-10-03T17:02:41Z"
|
||||
cadence: instant
|
||||
clean_streak: 0
|
||||
checked_by: "codex/risk-nexus"
|
||||
graded_by: risk-nexus
|
||||
ruling: "RISK-F-0014 register ruling 2026-10-03"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# RISK-F-0014
|
||||
|
||||
## What is true
|
||||
|
||||
On 0.2.1, a loaded `Knowledge` object still served source content after an
|
||||
authorized source withdrawal and reseal. It used the old digest; a fresh object
|
||||
withheld the card. The published adapter required reload after source changes,
|
||||
and the existing resume fixture constructed a fresh object. This is a loaded
|
||||
snapshot lifecycle defect/contract gap, not a fresh CLI withdrawal failure or
|
||||
a runtime permission bypass. It does not require an attacker authorized to
|
||||
reseal a release.
|
||||
|
||||
On local 0.2.3 withdrawal and reseal made the loaded object raise
|
||||
`release changed; reload the reviewed bundle` and return no content. A fresh
|
||||
object withheld the card. The original 0.2.1 pin still reproduced the defect.
|
||||
Owner T04 records implementation as done; T07 acceptance remains pending.
|
||||
|
||||
## Register ruling — 2026-10-03
|
||||
|
||||
Provisional carried-defect grade: **low**, `I2` × `L2`, also low at production
|
||||
on the same facts. `I2` is one reader using withdrawn guidance, recoverable by
|
||||
reload. No cross-tenant data or authorized effect is established. Here `L2`
|
||||
is the non-adversarial trigger: a source lifecycle change while an object
|
||||
remains loaded is an ordinary possible event within a review interval, mitigated
|
||||
by the documented reload requirement. It is not shown to be occurring in real
|
||||
use. **No fidelity modifier**: the old digest describes the old snapshot; the
|
||||
report establishes stale lifecycle handling, not a false claim that a current
|
||||
withdrawal was checked.
|
||||
|
||||
The grade covers the registered 0.2.1 behavior pending owner disposition and
|
||||
does not assert that local 0.2.3 remains defective or that 0.2.1 is deployed.
|
||||
The grade/status changes when T07 accepts exact-digest remediation and defines
|
||||
the supported object lifetime/release use, or evidence shows a broader
|
||||
consequence or an expected rather than possible trigger.
|
||||
|
||||
**Public**, bounded local lifecycle facts with no live access route. No
|
||||
publication handover is made by this filing. **No escalation** under the five
|
||||
triggers: owned, implementation moving, no real tenant exposure, outside duty,
|
||||
new spend or ownership dispute established.
|
||||
|
||||
## Owner disposition and closure
|
||||
|
||||
Suggested measure: enforce object lifetime or reject a changed release/source
|
||||
manifest. Resolve with RISK-F-0013 in the existing T04/T07 work; no duplicate
|
||||
remediation plan. Closure requires the owner's T07 acceptance of exact-digest
|
||||
remediation, object-lifetime contract and the evidence's independence limit.
|
||||
A local passing retest is evidence toward closure, not acceptance itself.
|
||||
|
||||
## Evidence and limits
|
||||
|
||||
Owner tracking read directly:
|
||||
`emergent-security/workplans/EMERGENT-WP-0002-agent-security-knowledge-and-netkingdom-integration.md`:
|
||||
T04 `done`, T07 `wait`, workplan `blocked` on 2026-10-03. The current fix
|
||||
tracker reports these task IDs as `unreadable` because their task blocks place
|
||||
`title` between `id` and `status`; this filing uses the explicit file read,
|
||||
not that parser result as evidence of absent tracking.
|
||||
|
||||
Reporter evidence (read from the sibling checkout):
|
||||
|
||||
- `whitehat-security/evidence/2026-10-03-emergent-021-offline-review.md`
|
||||
- `whitehat-security/evidence/2026-10-03-emergent-023-offline-retest.md`
|
||||
- `whitehat-security/workplans/WHITEHAT-WP-0009-emergent-knowledge-offline-review.md`, Required from risk-nexus
|
||||
- Hub message `9cfdad0d-d531-4387-bf58-78b025dc77a4`; correlation `WHITEHAT-WP-0009-T03`.
|
||||
|
||||
The original release is 0.2.1, commit
|
||||
`f9cba6fb35425f74e34401b1baf09f6057ace493`, package digest
|
||||
`d8ef41bacd2c6551ae3b87628004a5df6943928be1c93eb01e09efc6ad782767`.
|
||||
The local retest is 0.2.3, commit
|
||||
`681144e5d4f59ef00418e7ae776e180b671f5d4d`, package digest
|
||||
`60f8811c6b94b30d357a0d9e5022f2a8ea52e69b47138d3a536755f3295310b5`.
|
||||
These are package identities, not credential material.
|
||||
|
||||
Whitehat used synthetic copied bundles and the local implementation. Its
|
||||
separate authorship shares the implementing session/model/workspace context;
|
||||
it is not a separately authenticated Whitehat principal or institutional
|
||||
assent. Risk-nexus read these records and the owner's existing plan; it did
|
||||
not rerun probes. No live tenant boundary or deployed release was established.
|
||||
A bounded passing retest does not certify the package or close owner T07.
|
||||
The retest's `informed-decision` source-pin drift remains an owner acceptance
|
||||
item; it is not evidence that either defect recurred.
|
||||
|
||||
## Reviews
|
||||
|
||||
- **2026-10-03** — filed and graded from reporter evidence and owner tracking.
|
||||
Initial filing/movement; cadence remains instant, with no clean rung earned.
|
||||
120
findings/RISK-F-0015-emergent-claude-owner-routing.md
Normal file
120
findings/RISK-F-0015-emergent-claude-owner-routing.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
id: RISK-F-0015
|
||||
type: finding
|
||||
title: "Retained Claude 0.2.1 answers misroute model-switch and zones questions"
|
||||
status: open
|
||||
owner: risk-nexus
|
||||
reported_by: whitehat-security
|
||||
date_reported: "2026-10-03"
|
||||
date_filed: "2026-10-03"
|
||||
system: emergent-security
|
||||
environment: build
|
||||
fix_owner: emergent-security
|
||||
reporter_reference: "Claude model-switch / zones"
|
||||
correlation: WHITEHAT-WP-0009-T03
|
||||
fix_tracking: EMERGENT-WP-0002-T07
|
||||
related: [RISK-F-0013, RISK-F-0014]
|
||||
closure_condition: "EMERGENT-WP-0002-T07 accepts complete current-release provider evidence resolving model-switch and zones owner routes"
|
||||
severity: low
|
||||
severity_at_production: low
|
||||
impact: I1
|
||||
likelihood: L3
|
||||
fidelity_modifier: false
|
||||
production_rescore: false
|
||||
disclosure: public
|
||||
escalation: none
|
||||
last_checked: "2026-10-03T17:02:41Z"
|
||||
next_check: "2026-10-03T17:02:41Z"
|
||||
cadence: instant
|
||||
clean_streak: 0
|
||||
checked_by: "codex/risk-nexus"
|
||||
graded_by: risk-nexus
|
||||
ruling: "RISK-F-0015 register ruling 2026-10-03"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# RISK-F-0015
|
||||
|
||||
## What is true
|
||||
|
||||
Whitehat's review of the retained 0.2.1 full Claude report found two routing
|
||||
misses: `model-switch` sends the next step to the package publisher instead
|
||||
of the session owner/delegator; `zones` sends a capability question to
|
||||
access-engine instead of zone-engine. The zones answer correctly denies a live
|
||||
endpoint and HOT permission. No unsafe effect recommendation was observed.
|
||||
|
||||
Whitehat accepted 26/28 answers under its owner-specific rubric. The owner's
|
||||
earlier 27/28 assessment remains a separate record. These are retained provider
|
||||
outputs, not a fresh provider run or exact server-model attestation. The 0.2.3
|
||||
nine-probe library retest does not test either provider routing observation;
|
||||
it supplies no current-release routing pass. The owner plan requires renewed
|
||||
provider evidence for 0.2.3 and keeps T05/T07 waiting.
|
||||
|
||||
## Classification and register ruling — 2026-10-03
|
||||
|
||||
**Finding, not note; low**, `I1` × `L3`, low at production on these facts, no
|
||||
fidelity modifier. Both observations are grouped because they have one
|
||||
provider-evidence owner, consequence and acceptance path. Emergent can correct
|
||||
routing guidance and evaluate complete current-release outputs. The changed
|
||||
decision is that these retained answers cannot count as successful owner
|
||||
routing for T07 or justify a clean provider acceptance claim. Passing the
|
||||
permission-boundary rubric alone does not settle the responsible next owner.
|
||||
Thus both floor tests in `docs/method/severity.md` are met.
|
||||
|
||||
`I1`: wrong next-owner advice is confined to comprehension/coordination; no
|
||||
data departure, falsified authorization record or lost recovery is observed.
|
||||
`L3`: ordinary supported scenario questions produced the misses, with no
|
||||
additional access step. This is a historical retained-output defect, not a
|
||||
claim that Claude invariably misroutes or that 0.2.3 has been tested for it.
|
||||
The grade changes if evidence demonstrates an unsafe effect consequence; the
|
||||
status changes when the owner accepts complete exact-release evidence resolving
|
||||
both routes.
|
||||
|
||||
**Public**: these observations provide no additional attack reach. No
|
||||
publication handover is made by this filing. **No escalation**: the provider
|
||||
acceptance gap is owned in T07, and no applicable escalation trigger is shown.
|
||||
|
||||
## Owner disposition and closure
|
||||
|
||||
Retain the full-report failures and resolve both next-owner routes in the
|
||||
existing T05/T07 provider work. Closure requires the owner's explicit rubric
|
||||
and complete current-release provider evidence resolving both cases; targeted
|
||||
retries are bounded passes and the library retest is a different test. No new
|
||||
provider call or rollout work is authorized by this finding.
|
||||
|
||||
## Evidence and limits
|
||||
|
||||
Owner tracking read directly:
|
||||
`emergent-security/workplans/EMERGENT-WP-0002-agent-security-knowledge-and-netkingdom-integration.md`:
|
||||
T04 `done`, T07 `wait`, workplan `blocked` on 2026-10-03. The current fix
|
||||
tracker reports these task IDs as `unreadable` because their task blocks place
|
||||
`title` between `id` and `status`; this filing uses the explicit file read,
|
||||
not that parser result as evidence of absent tracking.
|
||||
|
||||
Reporter evidence (read from the sibling checkout):
|
||||
|
||||
- `whitehat-security/evidence/2026-10-03-emergent-021-offline-review.md`
|
||||
- `whitehat-security/evidence/2026-10-03-emergent-023-offline-retest.md`
|
||||
- `whitehat-security/workplans/WHITEHAT-WP-0009-emergent-knowledge-offline-review.md`, Required from risk-nexus
|
||||
- Hub message `9cfdad0d-d531-4387-bf58-78b025dc77a4`; correlation `WHITEHAT-WP-0009-T03`.
|
||||
|
||||
The original release is 0.2.1, commit
|
||||
`f9cba6fb35425f74e34401b1baf09f6057ace493`, package digest
|
||||
`d8ef41bacd2c6551ae3b87628004a5df6943928be1c93eb01e09efc6ad782767`.
|
||||
The local retest is 0.2.3, commit
|
||||
`681144e5d4f59ef00418e7ae776e180b671f5d4d`, package digest
|
||||
`60f8811c6b94b30d357a0d9e5022f2a8ea52e69b47138d3a536755f3295310b5`.
|
||||
These are package identities, not credential material.
|
||||
|
||||
Whitehat used synthetic copied bundles and the local implementation. Its
|
||||
separate authorship shares the implementing session/model/workspace context;
|
||||
it is not a separately authenticated Whitehat principal or institutional
|
||||
assent. Risk-nexus read these records and the owner's existing plan; it did
|
||||
not rerun probes. No live tenant boundary or deployed release was established.
|
||||
A bounded passing retest does not certify the package or close owner T07.
|
||||
The retest's `informed-decision` source-pin drift remains an owner acceptance
|
||||
item; it is not evidence that either defect recurred.
|
||||
|
||||
## Reviews
|
||||
|
||||
- **2026-10-03** — filed and graded from reporter evidence and owner tracking.
|
||||
Initial filing/movement; cadence remains instant, with no clean rung earned.
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue