Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
37906c3a22 Close out RISK-WP-0001: task notes, README, repo classification
T01, T02, T04-T08 done. T03 stays in progress: the escalation rule is
written and proposed, and it is not adopted until the custodian rules on
it — an unadopted rule is worse than an unwritten one because it looks
like coverage.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-19 23:34:34 +02:00
e8ee138ad2 Use the canon-registered id scheme for the workplan prefix
work-record-types_v0.1 pins workplan ids to ^[A-Z]+-WP-[0-9]{4}$ and tasks
to that plus -TNN; a hyphenated RISK-NEXUS prefix trips the sidetrack
detector. RISK-WP also matches the register's existing RISK-F finding
prefix. Renamed before the workplan was indexed anywhere.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-19 23:20:31 +02:00
63dde5fa38 RISK-NEXUS-WP-0001 — make the register decidable
The three open findings all leave severity, disclosure and escalation
unset, correctly: those are this repo's to set and the instruments to set
them with do not exist yet. The workplan writes the severity scale, the
disclosure states (re-taking the deferral with RISK-F-0001 in hand), the
escalation rule INTENT.md says is unwritten, and the review/expiry rule —
then grades the three findings and rules on what is waiting outside the
register.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-19 23:19:16 +02:00