risk-nexus/docs/regulatory/policies
tegwick 7f135f9e0f Legal policy set: written before needed, dormant until a context activates
Operator ruling: no external determination in build mode, but keep the
set of legal policies for reuse when a work context needs one in place.

docs/regulatory/policies/ catalogues thirteen, keyed by activation
condition rather than by regime, with a retrieval table so a context
pulls a slice: first real user account pulls six of them; a
consumer-facing product in Germany pulls those plus accessibility. Two
are already active and nobody had noticed — commercial and tax retention,
and the e-invoicing receiving obligation that has been live since 2025
with no named owner in the estate. Four written in full; the rest carry
their trigger now and get their text when a context approaches, which is
the point.

RISK-POL-0011 is the argument for the whole catalogue: accessibility
cannot be retrofitted cheaply, so a policy retrieved at launch is a
rebuild while one read at design time is just a constraint.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-20 23:36:22 +02:00
..
README.md Legal policy set: written before needed, dormant until a context activates 2026-08-20 23:36:22 +02:00
RISK-POL-0002-retention-and-erasure.md Legal policy set: written before needed, dormant until a context activates 2026-08-20 23:36:22 +02:00
RISK-POL-0009-commercial-and-tax-retention.md Legal policy set: written before needed, dormant until a context activates 2026-08-20 23:36:22 +02:00
RISK-POL-0011-accessibility.md Legal policy set: written before needed, dormant until a context activates 2026-08-20 23:36:22 +02:00
RISK-POL-0012-e-invoicing.md Legal policy set: written before needed, dormant until a context activates 2026-08-20 23:36:22 +02:00

Legal policy set

A catalogue of legal positions the estate will need, written before they are needed and dormant until a context activates one.

Operator ruling, 2026-08-20: the estate will not buy an external determination in build mode (RISK-F-0008). What it will do instead is keep this set, so that when a work context arrives which needs a specific legal position in place, the position is retrieved rather than researched from scratch.

That is a direct answer to the failure INTENT.md names — regulation "consulted and discarded", the same question asked twice and the answer silently expiring.

How a policy works

Each policy is dormant, active, or superseded, and carries an activation condition: the fact about the world that makes it apply. Nothing here is a compliance claim. A dormant policy asserts nothing about today; it states what would be required if its condition became true, so that the day it does, the work is retrieval rather than discovery.

id: RISK-POL-0002
regime: GDPR
status: dormant
activates_when: "the estate holds personal data of an identifiable natural person"
requires_of_systems: [...]
evidence: what would have to exist to show it is met

A policy is not a plan and does not schedule work. It is what the owning repo consults when its context changes. Deciding what to build in response is the owning repo's, as INTENT.md requires.

Retrieval by context

The point of the set is that a context pulls a slice. Some worked examples:

A context like… Pulls
First real user account, of any kind 0001, 0002, 0003, 0004, 0005, 0008
Consumer-facing product in Germany the above plus 0011, and 0010 if an agent talks to them
A vendor processing our data 0006, and 0007 if outside the EU
Selling to a business customer 0009, 0012, and 0006 if we process for them
Public-sector procurement 0013

The set

ID Regime Policy Status Activates when
0001 GDPR Art 6 Lawful basis for processing dormant any processing of personal data begins
0002 GDPR Arts 5(1)(e), 17 Retention and erasure part-active any personal data is held — the commercial half is already live
0003 GDPR Arts 1522 Data subject rights handling dormant a natural person can identify themselves to us
0004 GDPR Art 32 Security of processing dormant personal data is processed
0005 GDPR Arts 3334 Breach notification, 72 hours dormant personal data is held; fires on the first breach, not before
0006 GDPR Art 28 Processors and sub-processors dormant a vendor processes personal data on our behalf
0007 GDPR Arts 44+ International transfers dormant personal data leaves the EEA, including to a vendor's support desk
0008 GDPR Art 30 Records of processing dormant processing begins and the small-scale exemption does not hold
0009 HGB §257, AO §147 Commercial and tax retention active already — the estate invoices and books
0010 EU AI Act AI transparency and deployer duties dormant an AI system interacts with a person, or is placed on the market
0011 BFSG / EAA Accessibility of digital services dormant a consumer-facing digital service is offered in Germany
0012 UStG / ViDA E-invoicing active already — a German business must be able to receive structured e-invoices
0013 GWB / VgV / UVgO Public procurement participation dormant the estate bids for public contracts

Written in full so far: 0002, 0009, 0011, 0012 — the two that are already active, and the two most likely to activate next. The rest carry their activation condition here and are written when a context approaches, which is the point of the catalogue: the trigger is recorded now, the text is written when it is needed.

Every entry is risk-nexus's record of what a source says. None of it is legal advice, and this repo cannot make it into any.