2026-09-02 01:06:50 +02:00
|
|
|
"""PEP consume-before-side-effect client (GH-DEC-2026-003).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PEP that is about to cause a protected OpenBao write MUST obtain a
|
|
|
|
|
successful approval-engine CAS consume first. Holding a claim or an ALLOW is
|
|
|
|
|
not authority to act. Conflict, unavailability, or a missing binding means
|
|
|
|
|
do not call OpenBao.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This module does not render an authorization decision. The consume response
|
|
|
|
|
is mutation evidence, never a permission.
|
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import json
|
|
|
|
|
import re
|
|
|
|
|
from dataclasses import dataclass
|
|
|
|
|
from pathlib import Path
|
|
|
|
|
from typing import Any, Callable
|
|
|
|
|
from urllib.error import HTTPError, URLError
|
|
|
|
|
from urllib.request import Request, urlopen
|
|
|
|
|
|
fix: exclude correlation fields from the flex-auth request digest
Verified the digest join against flex-auth's T03 replay fixtures and found
request_digest was hashing fields docs/canonical-request-digest.md excludes.
The material is tenant, subject, action, resource, context only: id is
correlation, policy_version lives in provenance, caring_context is hashed
separately. This engine included all three when present.
Because the join adopts the served request id, every real production request
would have carried one, so the computed digest would have matched no issued
decision and failed closed against every correct allow. Same unsatisfiable
shape as the removed AUTHORITY constant.
The old pinned constant was computed with the id inside the material, so it
was wrong and its passing proved nothing. Replaced with fixture-driven tests
over two real envelopes (vendored with provenance) plus a structural test
that correlation fields do not move the digest. Both fixtures are needed:
input_claim_digests.context appears only with a non-empty context.
Also stops computing the native claim digest. The claim's binding.action and
binding.target speak approval-engine's vocabulary while ours speaks the
catalog's, and no mapping is published; flex-auth makes no cross-check and
states the correspondence is ours via pdp_digest. A claim recording no
pdp_digest now fails closed naming the missing mapping rather than comparing
two different languages. That mapping is a prerequisite for destroy.
274 tests pass. Production still fails closed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M65ovP3eiiPHubibvWs9mD
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 393550@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 4bb359f9-1f12-4410-9e76-079cf23c82e4
2026-09-06 14:17:38 +02:00
|
|
|
from secrets_engine.approval_claim import validate_approval_claim
|
feat: split the validator by owning layer per GH-DEC-2026-005
gate-house resolved APPROVAL-IN-0002. Two changes fell to this repo.
1. Split validate_action_authorization. The claim from approval-engine now
carries the approval fact (issuer, valid_now, consumption, binding digest,
freshness, reason_code) via approval_claim.validate_approval_claim; the
flex-auth DecisionEnvelope carries the decision (effect, binding match,
request digest, lifetime, policy pin) via validate_decision_envelope.
ActionAuthorization is deferred and never ratified (FLEX-DEC-2026-006) and
cannot be served from a step-1 call; nothing validates it now.
2. Dropped AUTHORITY = "state-hub" and the provenance.authority requirement.
State Hub is a read model with no runtime approval authority, so the check
failed closed against every correctly issued record. flex-auth traced the
constant to their own fixture and fixed it at source.
Two consequences recorded rather than buried: there are now two distinct
digests over the same action (approval-engine native over
{action,actor,principal,purpose,target}, and the flex-auth CheckRequest
digest) which are never compared to each other; and the distinct-approver
threshold is no longer checked here, since the claim exposes no approver
entries and approval-engine folds it into valid_now.
The canonical request digest is unchanged and its contract test is preserved
verbatim. Production still fails closed. 251 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M65ovP3eiiPHubibvWs9mD
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 393550@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 4bb359f9-1f12-4410-9e76-079cf23c82e4
2026-09-06 08:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
from secrets_engine.authorization import build_action_request, request_digest
|
2026-09-02 01:06:50 +02:00
|
|
|
from secrets_engine.errors import DecisionError
|
|
|
|
|
from secrets_engine.openbao import read_strict_token_file
|
|
|
|
|
from secrets_engine.pep_stance import demo_exception_enabled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIGEST_RE = re.compile(r"^sha256:[0-9a-f]{64}$")
|
|
|
|
|
_MAX_BODY = 256 * 1024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@dataclass(frozen=True)
|
|
|
|
|
class ConsumeBinding:
|
|
|
|
|
"""Inputs the PEP presents to approval-engine consume."""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
approval_id: str
|
|
|
|
|
request_digest: str
|
|
|
|
|
decision_id: str = ""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@dataclass(frozen=True)
|
|
|
|
|
class ConsumedApproval:
|
|
|
|
|
"""Non-secret confirmation that consume succeeded for this request."""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
approval_id: str
|
|
|
|
|
request_digest: str
|
|
|
|
|
decision_id: str = ""
|
|
|
|
|
idempotent: bool = False
|
|
|
|
|
consumed_at: str = ""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def as_evidence(self) -> dict[str, object]:
|
|
|
|
|
payload: dict[str, object] = {
|
|
|
|
|
"approval_consumed": True,
|
|
|
|
|
"approval_id": self.approval_id,
|
|
|
|
|
"request_digest": self.request_digest,
|
|
|
|
|
"approval_consume_idempotent": self.idempotent,
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
if self.decision_id:
|
|
|
|
|
payload["decision_id"] = self.decision_id
|
|
|
|
|
if self.consumed_at:
|
|
|
|
|
payload["approval_consumed_at"] = self.consumed_at
|
|
|
|
|
return payload
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: implement the PIP claim + validate authorization join
resolve_consume_binding was a `return None` stub, so protocol step 1 of
docs/approval-consumption.md (GET /v1/approvals/{id}/claim) and the
validation join never existed. validate_action_authorization had no caller
in src/ at all - it was reachable only from tests. Production fail-closed
was correct, but for an undocumented second reason, and WP-0007-T04's
"what remains is not local engine work" was wrong.
The join now reproduces the exact CheckRequest via build_action_request,
fetches the durable ActionAuthorization, and validates request binding,
digest, validity, authority, policy pin, and distinct-approver threshold
before offering a consume binding. _require_lane_approval threads the exact
field set for provision/rotate/verify/exec so the digest covers the real
proposed action.
Deliberate choices:
- The approval-engine object id is never inferred from a State Hub decision
UUID; flex-auth stated GET /decisions/{uuid} is not the durable object.
- No default policy pin. flex-auth stated secrets-engine.lifecycle/v1 is
example vocabulary, not a published package.
- A half-configured join raises rather than returning None, so a partial
deployment cannot be mistaken for an unconfigured one.
Behavior is unchanged today: every new input is absent by default, so
production still fails closed and plan/--dry-run still work. 234 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M65ovP3eiiPHubibvWs9mD
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 393550@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 4bb359f9-1f12-4410-9e76-079cf23c82e4
2026-09-06 01:01:55 +02:00
|
|
|
def _authorization_id(entry: Any, decision: Any) -> str:
|
|
|
|
|
"""Non-secret approval-engine object id for this lane, or "" if unbound.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
flex-auth: ``ActionAuthorization.id`` is the approval-engine object UUID.
|
|
|
|
|
It is never the State Hub decision UUID, so it is not inferred from one.
|
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
approval = getattr(entry, "approval", None) or {}
|
|
|
|
|
if isinstance(approval, dict):
|
|
|
|
|
declared = str(approval.get("authorization_id", "") or "").strip()
|
|
|
|
|
if declared:
|
|
|
|
|
return declared
|
|
|
|
|
for attr in ("authorization_id", "action_authorization_id"):
|
|
|
|
|
served = str(getattr(decision, attr, "") or "").strip()
|
|
|
|
|
if served:
|
|
|
|
|
return served
|
|
|
|
|
return ""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _request_purpose(entry: Any) -> str:
|
|
|
|
|
"""Declared purpose for the request context. Never invented at call time."""
|
|
|
|
|
approval = getattr(entry, "approval", None) or {}
|
|
|
|
|
if isinstance(approval, dict):
|
|
|
|
|
declared = str(approval.get("purpose", "") or "").strip()
|
|
|
|
|
if declared:
|
|
|
|
|
return declared
|
|
|
|
|
for consumer in getattr(entry, "consumers", None) or []:
|
|
|
|
|
if isinstance(consumer, dict):
|
|
|
|
|
declared = str(consumer.get("purpose", "") or "").strip()
|
|
|
|
|
if declared:
|
|
|
|
|
return declared
|
|
|
|
|
return ""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
feat: split the validator by owning layer per GH-DEC-2026-005
gate-house resolved APPROVAL-IN-0002. Two changes fell to this repo.
1. Split validate_action_authorization. The claim from approval-engine now
carries the approval fact (issuer, valid_now, consumption, binding digest,
freshness, reason_code) via approval_claim.validate_approval_claim; the
flex-auth DecisionEnvelope carries the decision (effect, binding match,
request digest, lifetime, policy pin) via validate_decision_envelope.
ActionAuthorization is deferred and never ratified (FLEX-DEC-2026-006) and
cannot be served from a step-1 call; nothing validates it now.
2. Dropped AUTHORITY = "state-hub" and the provenance.authority requirement.
State Hub is a read model with no runtime approval authority, so the check
failed closed against every correctly issued record. flex-auth traced the
constant to their own fixture and fixed it at source.
Two consequences recorded rather than buried: there are now two distinct
digests over the same action (approval-engine native over
{action,actor,principal,purpose,target}, and the flex-auth CheckRequest
digest) which are never compared to each other; and the distinct-approver
threshold is no longer checked here, since the claim exposes no approver
entries and approval-engine folds it into valid_now.
The canonical request digest is unchanged and its contract test is preserved
verbatim. Production still fails closed. 251 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M65ovP3eiiPHubibvWs9mD
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 393550@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 4bb359f9-1f12-4410-9e76-079cf23c82e4
2026-09-06 08:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
def fetch_approval_claim(
|
feat: implement the PIP claim + validate authorization join
resolve_consume_binding was a `return None` stub, so protocol step 1 of
docs/approval-consumption.md (GET /v1/approvals/{id}/claim) and the
validation join never existed. validate_action_authorization had no caller
in src/ at all - it was reachable only from tests. Production fail-closed
was correct, but for an undocumented second reason, and WP-0007-T04's
"what remains is not local engine work" was wrong.
The join now reproduces the exact CheckRequest via build_action_request,
fetches the durable ActionAuthorization, and validates request binding,
digest, validity, authority, policy pin, and distinct-approver threshold
before offering a consume binding. _require_lane_approval threads the exact
field set for provision/rotate/verify/exec so the digest covers the real
proposed action.
Deliberate choices:
- The approval-engine object id is never inferred from a State Hub decision
UUID; flex-auth stated GET /decisions/{uuid} is not the durable object.
- No default policy pin. flex-auth stated secrets-engine.lifecycle/v1 is
example vocabulary, not a published package.
- A half-configured join raises rather than returning None, so a partial
deployment cannot be mistaken for an unconfigured one.
Behavior is unchanged today: every new input is absent by default, so
production still fails closed and plan/--dry-run still work. 234 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M65ovP3eiiPHubibvWs9mD
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 393550@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 4bb359f9-1f12-4410-9e76-079cf23c82e4
2026-09-06 01:01:55 +02:00
|
|
|
*,
|
|
|
|
|
base_url: str,
|
|
|
|
|
token_file: Path,
|
|
|
|
|
authorization_id: str,
|
|
|
|
|
timeout_seconds: float = 3,
|
|
|
|
|
opener: Callable[..., Any] = urlopen,
|
|
|
|
|
) -> dict[str, Any]:
|
feat: split the validator by owning layer per GH-DEC-2026-005
gate-house resolved APPROVAL-IN-0002. Two changes fell to this repo.
1. Split validate_action_authorization. The claim from approval-engine now
carries the approval fact (issuer, valid_now, consumption, binding digest,
freshness, reason_code) via approval_claim.validate_approval_claim; the
flex-auth DecisionEnvelope carries the decision (effect, binding match,
request digest, lifetime, policy pin) via validate_decision_envelope.
ActionAuthorization is deferred and never ratified (FLEX-DEC-2026-006) and
cannot be served from a step-1 call; nothing validates it now.
2. Dropped AUTHORITY = "state-hub" and the provenance.authority requirement.
State Hub is a read model with no runtime approval authority, so the check
failed closed against every correctly issued record. flex-auth traced the
constant to their own fixture and fixed it at source.
Two consequences recorded rather than buried: there are now two distinct
digests over the same action (approval-engine native over
{action,actor,principal,purpose,target}, and the flex-auth CheckRequest
digest) which are never compared to each other; and the distinct-approver
threshold is no longer checked here, since the claim exposes no approver
entries and approval-engine folds it into valid_now.
The canonical request digest is unchanged and its contract test is preserved
verbatim. Production still fails closed. 251 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M65ovP3eiiPHubibvWs9mD
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 393550@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 4bb359f9-1f12-4410-9e76-079cf23c82e4
2026-09-06 08:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
"""GET /v1/approvals/{id}/claim (PIP). Any non-200 fails closed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The body is approval-engine's approval-claim, not a flex-auth
|
|
|
|
|
ActionAuthorization -- that object is deferred and was never ratified
|
|
|
|
|
(GH-DEC-2026-005 / FLEX-DEC-2026-006).
|
|
|
|
|
"""
|
feat: implement the PIP claim + validate authorization join
resolve_consume_binding was a `return None` stub, so protocol step 1 of
docs/approval-consumption.md (GET /v1/approvals/{id}/claim) and the
validation join never existed. validate_action_authorization had no caller
in src/ at all - it was reachable only from tests. Production fail-closed
was correct, but for an undocumented second reason, and WP-0007-T04's
"what remains is not local engine work" was wrong.
The join now reproduces the exact CheckRequest via build_action_request,
fetches the durable ActionAuthorization, and validates request binding,
digest, validity, authority, policy pin, and distinct-approver threshold
before offering a consume binding. _require_lane_approval threads the exact
field set for provision/rotate/verify/exec so the digest covers the real
proposed action.
Deliberate choices:
- The approval-engine object id is never inferred from a State Hub decision
UUID; flex-auth stated GET /decisions/{uuid} is not the durable object.
- No default policy pin. flex-auth stated secrets-engine.lifecycle/v1 is
example vocabulary, not a published package.
- A half-configured join raises rather than returning None, so a partial
deployment cannot be mistaken for an unconfigured one.
Behavior is unchanged today: every new input is absent by default, so
production still fails closed and plan/--dry-run still work. 234 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M65ovP3eiiPHubibvWs9mD
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 393550@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 4bb359f9-1f12-4410-9e76-079cf23c82e4
2026-09-06 01:01:55 +02:00
|
|
|
if not base_url or not base_url.startswith(("http://", "https://")):
|
|
|
|
|
raise DecisionError("approval-engine claim URL is missing or invalid")
|
|
|
|
|
ident = authorization_id.strip()
|
|
|
|
|
if not ident or "/" in ident or any(ch.isspace() for ch in ident):
|
|
|
|
|
raise DecisionError("approval claim requires a concrete authorization id")
|
|
|
|
|
token = read_strict_token_file(Path(token_file), purpose="approval claim credential")
|
|
|
|
|
request = Request(
|
|
|
|
|
base_url.rstrip("/") + f"/v1/approvals/{ident}/claim",
|
|
|
|
|
method="GET",
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
request.add_header("Authorization", f"Bearer {token}")
|
|
|
|
|
request.add_header("Accept", "application/json")
|
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
|
with opener(request, timeout=timeout_seconds) as response:
|
|
|
|
|
if getattr(response, "status", 200) != 200:
|
feat: split the validator by owning layer per GH-DEC-2026-005
gate-house resolved APPROVAL-IN-0002. Two changes fell to this repo.
1. Split validate_action_authorization. The claim from approval-engine now
carries the approval fact (issuer, valid_now, consumption, binding digest,
freshness, reason_code) via approval_claim.validate_approval_claim; the
flex-auth DecisionEnvelope carries the decision (effect, binding match,
request digest, lifetime, policy pin) via validate_decision_envelope.
ActionAuthorization is deferred and never ratified (FLEX-DEC-2026-006) and
cannot be served from a step-1 call; nothing validates it now.
2. Dropped AUTHORITY = "state-hub" and the provenance.authority requirement.
State Hub is a read model with no runtime approval authority, so the check
failed closed against every correctly issued record. flex-auth traced the
constant to their own fixture and fixed it at source.
Two consequences recorded rather than buried: there are now two distinct
digests over the same action (approval-engine native over
{action,actor,principal,purpose,target}, and the flex-auth CheckRequest
digest) which are never compared to each other; and the distinct-approver
threshold is no longer checked here, since the claim exposes no approver
entries and approval-engine folds it into valid_now.
The canonical request digest is unchanged and its contract test is preserved
verbatim. Production still fails closed. 251 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M65ovP3eiiPHubibvWs9mD
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 393550@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 4bb359f9-1f12-4410-9e76-079cf23c82e4
2026-09-06 08:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
raise DecisionError("approval claim did not return a claim")
|
feat: implement the PIP claim + validate authorization join
resolve_consume_binding was a `return None` stub, so protocol step 1 of
docs/approval-consumption.md (GET /v1/approvals/{id}/claim) and the
validation join never existed. validate_action_authorization had no caller
in src/ at all - it was reachable only from tests. Production fail-closed
was correct, but for an undocumented second reason, and WP-0007-T04's
"what remains is not local engine work" was wrong.
The join now reproduces the exact CheckRequest via build_action_request,
fetches the durable ActionAuthorization, and validates request binding,
digest, validity, authority, policy pin, and distinct-approver threshold
before offering a consume binding. _require_lane_approval threads the exact
field set for provision/rotate/verify/exec so the digest covers the real
proposed action.
Deliberate choices:
- The approval-engine object id is never inferred from a State Hub decision
UUID; flex-auth stated GET /decisions/{uuid} is not the durable object.
- No default policy pin. flex-auth stated secrets-engine.lifecycle/v1 is
example vocabulary, not a published package.
- A half-configured join raises rather than returning None, so a partial
deployment cannot be mistaken for an unconfigured one.
Behavior is unchanged today: every new input is absent by default, so
production still fails closed and plan/--dry-run still work. 234 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M65ovP3eiiPHubibvWs9mD
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 393550@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 4bb359f9-1f12-4410-9e76-079cf23c82e4
2026-09-06 01:01:55 +02:00
|
|
|
payload = json.loads(response.read(_MAX_BODY).decode("utf-8"))
|
|
|
|
|
except HTTPError as e:
|
|
|
|
|
raise DecisionError(f"approval claim refused: {_status_message(e.code)}") from e
|
|
|
|
|
except URLError as e:
|
|
|
|
|
raise DecisionError("approval-engine is unreachable for claim") from e
|
|
|
|
|
except json.JSONDecodeError as e:
|
|
|
|
|
raise DecisionError("approval claim returned a non-JSON body") from e
|
|
|
|
|
if not isinstance(payload, dict):
|
|
|
|
|
raise DecisionError("approval claim returned a non-object body")
|
|
|
|
|
return payload
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-09-02 01:06:50 +02:00
|
|
|
def resolve_consume_binding(
|
feat: implement the PIP claim + validate authorization join
resolve_consume_binding was a `return None` stub, so protocol step 1 of
docs/approval-consumption.md (GET /v1/approvals/{id}/claim) and the
validation join never existed. validate_action_authorization had no caller
in src/ at all - it was reachable only from tests. Production fail-closed
was correct, but for an undocumented second reason, and WP-0007-T04's
"what remains is not local engine work" was wrong.
The join now reproduces the exact CheckRequest via build_action_request,
fetches the durable ActionAuthorization, and validates request binding,
digest, validity, authority, policy pin, and distinct-approver threshold
before offering a consume binding. _require_lane_approval threads the exact
field set for provision/rotate/verify/exec so the digest covers the real
proposed action.
Deliberate choices:
- The approval-engine object id is never inferred from a State Hub decision
UUID; flex-auth stated GET /decisions/{uuid} is not the durable object.
- No default policy pin. flex-auth stated secrets-engine.lifecycle/v1 is
example vocabulary, not a published package.
- A half-configured join raises rather than returning None, so a partial
deployment cannot be mistaken for an unconfigured one.
Behavior is unchanged today: every new input is absent by default, so
production still fails closed and plan/--dry-run still work. 234 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M65ovP3eiiPHubibvWs9mD
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 393550@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 4bb359f9-1f12-4410-9e76-079cf23c82e4
2026-09-06 01:01:55 +02:00
|
|
|
cfg: Any,
|
|
|
|
|
entry: Any,
|
|
|
|
|
action: str,
|
|
|
|
|
decision: Any,
|
|
|
|
|
*,
|
|
|
|
|
fields: tuple[str, ...] = (),
|
|
|
|
|
policy_targets: tuple[str, ...] = (),
|
|
|
|
|
auth_targets: tuple[str, ...] = (),
|
|
|
|
|
opener: Callable[..., Any] | None = None,
|
2026-09-02 01:06:50 +02:00
|
|
|
) -> ConsumeBinding | None:
|
feat: split the validator by owning layer per GH-DEC-2026-005
gate-house resolved APPROVAL-IN-0002. Two changes fell to this repo.
1. Split validate_action_authorization. The claim from approval-engine now
carries the approval fact (issuer, valid_now, consumption, binding digest,
freshness, reason_code) via approval_claim.validate_approval_claim; the
flex-auth DecisionEnvelope carries the decision (effect, binding match,
request digest, lifetime, policy pin) via validate_decision_envelope.
ActionAuthorization is deferred and never ratified (FLEX-DEC-2026-006) and
cannot be served from a step-1 call; nothing validates it now.
2. Dropped AUTHORITY = "state-hub" and the provenance.authority requirement.
State Hub is a read model with no runtime approval authority, so the check
failed closed against every correctly issued record. flex-auth traced the
constant to their own fixture and fixed it at source.
Two consequences recorded rather than buried: there are now two distinct
digests over the same action (approval-engine native over
{action,actor,principal,purpose,target}, and the flex-auth CheckRequest
digest) which are never compared to each other; and the distinct-approver
threshold is no longer checked here, since the claim exposes no approver
entries and approval-engine folds it into valid_now.
The canonical request digest is unchanged and its contract test is preserved
verbatim. Production still fails closed. 251 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M65ovP3eiiPHubibvWs9mD
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 393550@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 4bb359f9-1f12-4410-9e76-079cf23c82e4
2026-09-06 08:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
"""Join the proposed action to a served approval-claim (step 1 of GH-DEC-2026-003).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Returns None only when no serving path is configured at all, keeping
|
|
|
|
|
production fail-closed exactly as it was before the join existed. Anything
|
|
|
|
|
configured-but-wrong raises: a half-configured PEP must not look like an
|
|
|
|
|
unconfigured one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Step 2 (the flex-auth DecisionEnvelope from POST /v1/check) is validated by
|
|
|
|
|
``authorization.validate_decision_envelope``. No PDP is reachable for this
|
|
|
|
|
consumer yet -- flex-auth runs per-consumer cluster-local pins and
|
|
|
|
|
``flex-auth-secrets-engine`` has not been created -- so that call is not
|
|
|
|
|
wired here and production stays closed at the stance gate regardless.
|
2026-09-02 01:06:50 +02:00
|
|
|
"""
|
feat: implement the PIP claim + validate authorization join
resolve_consume_binding was a `return None` stub, so protocol step 1 of
docs/approval-consumption.md (GET /v1/approvals/{id}/claim) and the
validation join never existed. validate_action_authorization had no caller
in src/ at all - it was reachable only from tests. Production fail-closed
was correct, but for an undocumented second reason, and WP-0007-T04's
"what remains is not local engine work" was wrong.
The join now reproduces the exact CheckRequest via build_action_request,
fetches the durable ActionAuthorization, and validates request binding,
digest, validity, authority, policy pin, and distinct-approver threshold
before offering a consume binding. _require_lane_approval threads the exact
field set for provision/rotate/verify/exec so the digest covers the real
proposed action.
Deliberate choices:
- The approval-engine object id is never inferred from a State Hub decision
UUID; flex-auth stated GET /decisions/{uuid} is not the durable object.
- No default policy pin. flex-auth stated secrets-engine.lifecycle/v1 is
example vocabulary, not a published package.
- A half-configured join raises rather than returning None, so a partial
deployment cannot be mistaken for an unconfigured one.
Behavior is unchanged today: every new input is absent by default, so
production still fails closed and plan/--dry-run still work. 234 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M65ovP3eiiPHubibvWs9mD
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 393550@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 4bb359f9-1f12-4410-9e76-079cf23c82e4
2026-09-06 01:01:55 +02:00
|
|
|
base_url = str(getattr(cfg, "approval_url", "") or "")
|
|
|
|
|
token_file = getattr(cfg, "approval_token_file", None)
|
|
|
|
|
authorization_id = _authorization_id(entry, decision)
|
|
|
|
|
if not base_url or not token_file or not authorization_id:
|
|
|
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
subject_id = str(getattr(cfg, "authorization_subject_id", "") or "")
|
|
|
|
|
subject_type = str(getattr(cfg, "authorization_subject_type", "") or "")
|
|
|
|
|
if not subject_id or not subject_type:
|
|
|
|
|
raise DecisionError(
|
|
|
|
|
"authorization join requires SECRETS_ENGINE_AUTHORIZATION_SUBJECT_ID "
|
|
|
|
|
"and _SUBJECT_TYPE; the PEP must not assert an unnamed subject"
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
purpose = _request_purpose(entry)
|
|
|
|
|
if not purpose:
|
|
|
|
|
raise DecisionError(
|
|
|
|
|
"authorization join requires a declared approval/consumer purpose"
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expected_request = build_action_request(
|
|
|
|
|
entry,
|
|
|
|
|
action,
|
|
|
|
|
subject_id=subject_id,
|
|
|
|
|
subject_type=subject_type,
|
|
|
|
|
purpose=purpose,
|
|
|
|
|
fields=fields,
|
|
|
|
|
policy_targets=policy_targets,
|
|
|
|
|
auth_targets=auth_targets,
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
fix: exclude correlation fields from the flex-auth request digest
Verified the digest join against flex-auth's T03 replay fixtures and found
request_digest was hashing fields docs/canonical-request-digest.md excludes.
The material is tenant, subject, action, resource, context only: id is
correlation, policy_version lives in provenance, caring_context is hashed
separately. This engine included all three when present.
Because the join adopts the served request id, every real production request
would have carried one, so the computed digest would have matched no issued
decision and failed closed against every correct allow. Same unsatisfiable
shape as the removed AUTHORITY constant.
The old pinned constant was computed with the id inside the material, so it
was wrong and its passing proved nothing. Replaced with fixture-driven tests
over two real envelopes (vendored with provenance) plus a structural test
that correlation fields do not move the digest. Both fixtures are needed:
input_claim_digests.context appears only with a non-empty context.
Also stops computing the native claim digest. The claim's binding.action and
binding.target speak approval-engine's vocabulary while ours speaks the
catalog's, and no mapping is published; flex-auth makes no cross-check and
states the correspondence is ours via pdp_digest. A claim recording no
pdp_digest now fails closed naming the missing mapping rather than comparing
two different languages. That mapping is a prerequisite for destroy.
274 tests pass. Production still fails closed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M65ovP3eiiPHubibvWs9mD
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 393550@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 4bb359f9-1f12-4410-9e76-079cf23c82e4
2026-09-06 14:17:38 +02:00
|
|
|
# Two different digests over the same proposed action, by contract; they are
|
|
|
|
|
# never compared to each other.
|
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
|
# Only the PDP digest is usable for the action/target correspondence today.
|
|
|
|
|
# The claim's binding.action and binding.target speak approval-engine's
|
|
|
|
|
# vocabulary ("secrets.kv.destroy", {"id": ..., "stage": ...}) while ours
|
|
|
|
|
# speaks the catalog's ("destroy", "catalog:<id>"), and no mapping between
|
|
|
|
|
# them is published. flex-auth makes no cross-check either and states the
|
|
|
|
|
# correspondence is ours, via pdp_digest. Computing a native digest from our
|
|
|
|
|
# own vocabulary would compare two different languages and never match --
|
|
|
|
|
# the same unsatisfiable-rule defect flex-auth fixed in 68ad039 -- so we do
|
|
|
|
|
# not compute one, and validate_approval_claim fails closed with a named
|
|
|
|
|
# reason when the issuer recorded no pdp_digest.
|
feat: split the validator by owning layer per GH-DEC-2026-005
gate-house resolved APPROVAL-IN-0002. Two changes fell to this repo.
1. Split validate_action_authorization. The claim from approval-engine now
carries the approval fact (issuer, valid_now, consumption, binding digest,
freshness, reason_code) via approval_claim.validate_approval_claim; the
flex-auth DecisionEnvelope carries the decision (effect, binding match,
request digest, lifetime, policy pin) via validate_decision_envelope.
ActionAuthorization is deferred and never ratified (FLEX-DEC-2026-006) and
cannot be served from a step-1 call; nothing validates it now.
2. Dropped AUTHORITY = "state-hub" and the provenance.authority requirement.
State Hub is a read model with no runtime approval authority, so the check
failed closed against every correctly issued record. flex-auth traced the
constant to their own fixture and fixed it at source.
Two consequences recorded rather than buried: there are now two distinct
digests over the same action (approval-engine native over
{action,actor,principal,purpose,target}, and the flex-auth CheckRequest
digest) which are never compared to each other; and the distinct-approver
threshold is no longer checked here, since the claim exposes no approver
entries and approval-engine folds it into valid_now.
The canonical request digest is unchanged and its contract test is preserved
verbatim. Production still fails closed. 251 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M65ovP3eiiPHubibvWs9mD
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 393550@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 4bb359f9-1f12-4410-9e76-079cf23c82e4
2026-09-06 08:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
pdp_digest = request_digest(expected_request)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
claim = fetch_approval_claim(
|
|
|
|
|
base_url=base_url,
|
|
|
|
|
token_file=Path(token_file),
|
|
|
|
|
authorization_id=authorization_id,
|
|
|
|
|
opener=opener or urlopen,
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
validate_approval_claim(
|
|
|
|
|
claim,
|
|
|
|
|
approval_id=authorization_id,
|
|
|
|
|
expected_pdp_digest=pdp_digest,
|
feat: implement the PIP claim + validate authorization join
resolve_consume_binding was a `return None` stub, so protocol step 1 of
docs/approval-consumption.md (GET /v1/approvals/{id}/claim) and the
validation join never existed. validate_action_authorization had no caller
in src/ at all - it was reachable only from tests. Production fail-closed
was correct, but for an undocumented second reason, and WP-0007-T04's
"what remains is not local engine work" was wrong.
The join now reproduces the exact CheckRequest via build_action_request,
fetches the durable ActionAuthorization, and validates request binding,
digest, validity, authority, policy pin, and distinct-approver threshold
before offering a consume binding. _require_lane_approval threads the exact
field set for provision/rotate/verify/exec so the digest covers the real
proposed action.
Deliberate choices:
- The approval-engine object id is never inferred from a State Hub decision
UUID; flex-auth stated GET /decisions/{uuid} is not the durable object.
- No default policy pin. flex-auth stated secrets-engine.lifecycle/v1 is
example vocabulary, not a published package.
- A half-configured join raises rather than returning None, so a partial
deployment cannot be mistaken for an unconfigured one.
Behavior is unchanged today: every new input is absent by default, so
production still fails closed and plan/--dry-run still work. 234 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M65ovP3eiiPHubibvWs9mD
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 393550@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 4bb359f9-1f12-4410-9e76-079cf23c82e4
2026-09-06 01:01:55 +02:00
|
|
|
)
|
feat: split the validator by owning layer per GH-DEC-2026-005
gate-house resolved APPROVAL-IN-0002. Two changes fell to this repo.
1. Split validate_action_authorization. The claim from approval-engine now
carries the approval fact (issuer, valid_now, consumption, binding digest,
freshness, reason_code) via approval_claim.validate_approval_claim; the
flex-auth DecisionEnvelope carries the decision (effect, binding match,
request digest, lifetime, policy pin) via validate_decision_envelope.
ActionAuthorization is deferred and never ratified (FLEX-DEC-2026-006) and
cannot be served from a step-1 call; nothing validates it now.
2. Dropped AUTHORITY = "state-hub" and the provenance.authority requirement.
State Hub is a read model with no runtime approval authority, so the check
failed closed against every correctly issued record. flex-auth traced the
constant to their own fixture and fixed it at source.
Two consequences recorded rather than buried: there are now two distinct
digests over the same action (approval-engine native over
{action,actor,principal,purpose,target}, and the flex-auth CheckRequest
digest) which are never compared to each other; and the distinct-approver
threshold is no longer checked here, since the claim exposes no approver
entries and approval-engine folds it into valid_now.
The canonical request digest is unchanged and its contract test is preserved
verbatim. Production still fails closed. 251 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M65ovP3eiiPHubibvWs9mD
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 393550@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 4bb359f9-1f12-4410-9e76-079cf23c82e4
2026-09-06 08:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
binding = claim.get("binding") or {}
|
|
|
|
|
if isinstance(binding, dict) and binding.get("action") not in (None, action):
|
|
|
|
|
raise DecisionError("approval claim does not bind this action")
|
feat: implement the PIP claim + validate authorization join
resolve_consume_binding was a `return None` stub, so protocol step 1 of
docs/approval-consumption.md (GET /v1/approvals/{id}/claim) and the
validation join never existed. validate_action_authorization had no caller
in src/ at all - it was reachable only from tests. Production fail-closed
was correct, but for an undocumented second reason, and WP-0007-T04's
"what remains is not local engine work" was wrong.
The join now reproduces the exact CheckRequest via build_action_request,
fetches the durable ActionAuthorization, and validates request binding,
digest, validity, authority, policy pin, and distinct-approver threshold
before offering a consume binding. _require_lane_approval threads the exact
field set for provision/rotate/verify/exec so the digest covers the real
proposed action.
Deliberate choices:
- The approval-engine object id is never inferred from a State Hub decision
UUID; flex-auth stated GET /decisions/{uuid} is not the durable object.
- No default policy pin. flex-auth stated secrets-engine.lifecycle/v1 is
example vocabulary, not a published package.
- A half-configured join raises rather than returning None, so a partial
deployment cannot be mistaken for an unconfigured one.
Behavior is unchanged today: every new input is absent by default, so
production still fails closed and plan/--dry-run still work. 234 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M65ovP3eiiPHubibvWs9mD
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 393550@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 4bb359f9-1f12-4410-9e76-079cf23c82e4
2026-09-06 01:01:55 +02:00
|
|
|
return ConsumeBinding(
|
feat: split the validator by owning layer per GH-DEC-2026-005
gate-house resolved APPROVAL-IN-0002. Two changes fell to this repo.
1. Split validate_action_authorization. The claim from approval-engine now
carries the approval fact (issuer, valid_now, consumption, binding digest,
freshness, reason_code) via approval_claim.validate_approval_claim; the
flex-auth DecisionEnvelope carries the decision (effect, binding match,
request digest, lifetime, policy pin) via validate_decision_envelope.
ActionAuthorization is deferred and never ratified (FLEX-DEC-2026-006) and
cannot be served from a step-1 call; nothing validates it now.
2. Dropped AUTHORITY = "state-hub" and the provenance.authority requirement.
State Hub is a read model with no runtime approval authority, so the check
failed closed against every correctly issued record. flex-auth traced the
constant to their own fixture and fixed it at source.
Two consequences recorded rather than buried: there are now two distinct
digests over the same action (approval-engine native over
{action,actor,principal,purpose,target}, and the flex-auth CheckRequest
digest) which are never compared to each other; and the distinct-approver
threshold is no longer checked here, since the claim exposes no approver
entries and approval-engine folds it into valid_now.
The canonical request digest is unchanged and its contract test is preserved
verbatim. Production still fails closed. 251 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M65ovP3eiiPHubibvWs9mD
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 393550@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 4bb359f9-1f12-4410-9e76-079cf23c82e4
2026-09-06 08:02:01 +02:00
|
|
|
approval_id=authorization_id,
|
|
|
|
|
request_digest=pdp_digest,
|
|
|
|
|
decision_id="",
|
feat: implement the PIP claim + validate authorization join
resolve_consume_binding was a `return None` stub, so protocol step 1 of
docs/approval-consumption.md (GET /v1/approvals/{id}/claim) and the
validation join never existed. validate_action_authorization had no caller
in src/ at all - it was reachable only from tests. Production fail-closed
was correct, but for an undocumented second reason, and WP-0007-T04's
"what remains is not local engine work" was wrong.
The join now reproduces the exact CheckRequest via build_action_request,
fetches the durable ActionAuthorization, and validates request binding,
digest, validity, authority, policy pin, and distinct-approver threshold
before offering a consume binding. _require_lane_approval threads the exact
field set for provision/rotate/verify/exec so the digest covers the real
proposed action.
Deliberate choices:
- The approval-engine object id is never inferred from a State Hub decision
UUID; flex-auth stated GET /decisions/{uuid} is not the durable object.
- No default policy pin. flex-auth stated secrets-engine.lifecycle/v1 is
example vocabulary, not a published package.
- A half-configured join raises rather than returning None, so a partial
deployment cannot be mistaken for an unconfigured one.
Behavior is unchanged today: every new input is absent by default, so
production still fails closed and plan/--dry-run still work. 234 tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M65ovP3eiiPHubibvWs9mD
Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 393550@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 4bb359f9-1f12-4410-9e76-079cf23c82e4
2026-09-06 01:01:55 +02:00
|
|
|
)
|
2026-09-02 01:06:50 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def consume_approval(
|
|
|
|
|
*,
|
|
|
|
|
base_url: str,
|
|
|
|
|
token_file: Path,
|
|
|
|
|
binding: ConsumeBinding,
|
|
|
|
|
timeout_seconds: float = 3,
|
|
|
|
|
opener: Callable[..., Any] = urlopen,
|
|
|
|
|
) -> ConsumedApproval:
|
|
|
|
|
"""POST /v1/approvals/{id}/consume. Fail closed on anything but confirmed use."""
|
|
|
|
|
if not base_url or not base_url.startswith(("http://", "https://")):
|
|
|
|
|
raise DecisionError("approval-engine consume URL is missing or invalid")
|
|
|
|
|
approval_id = binding.approval_id.strip()
|
|
|
|
|
if not approval_id or "/" in approval_id or any(ch.isspace() for ch in approval_id):
|
|
|
|
|
raise DecisionError("approval consume requires a concrete approval id")
|
|
|
|
|
if not DIGEST_RE.fullmatch(binding.request_digest):
|
|
|
|
|
raise DecisionError("approval consume requires the canonical request digest")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
token = read_strict_token_file(Path(token_file), purpose="approval consume credential")
|
|
|
|
|
body: dict[str, str] = {"request_digest": binding.request_digest}
|
|
|
|
|
if binding.decision_id:
|
|
|
|
|
body["decision_id"] = binding.decision_id
|
|
|
|
|
encoded = json.dumps(body).encode("utf-8")
|
|
|
|
|
request = Request(
|
|
|
|
|
base_url.rstrip("/") + f"/v1/approvals/{approval_id}/consume",
|
|
|
|
|
data=encoded,
|
|
|
|
|
method="POST",
|
|
|
|
|
headers={
|
|
|
|
|
"Authorization": f"Bearer {token}",
|
|
|
|
|
"Content-Type": "application/json",
|
|
|
|
|
"Accept": "application/json",
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
|
response = opener(request, timeout=timeout_seconds)
|
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
|
status = int(response.getcode())
|
|
|
|
|
raw = response.read(_MAX_BODY + 1)
|
|
|
|
|
finally:
|
|
|
|
|
response.close()
|
|
|
|
|
except HTTPError as exc:
|
|
|
|
|
status = int(getattr(exc, "code", 0) or 0)
|
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
|
exc.read(_MAX_BODY)
|
|
|
|
|
except Exception:
|
|
|
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
|
raise DecisionError(_status_message(status)) from None
|
|
|
|
|
except (URLError, TimeoutError, OSError):
|
|
|
|
|
raise DecisionError(
|
|
|
|
|
"approval-engine unreachable; OpenBao must not be called"
|
|
|
|
|
) from None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if status != 200 or len(raw) > _MAX_BODY:
|
|
|
|
|
raise DecisionError(_status_message(status if status != 200 else 502))
|
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
|
payload = json.loads(raw.decode("utf-8"))
|
|
|
|
|
except (UnicodeDecodeError, json.JSONDecodeError) as exc:
|
|
|
|
|
raise DecisionError("approval consume returned invalid JSON") from exc
|
|
|
|
|
if not isinstance(payload, dict):
|
|
|
|
|
raise DecisionError("approval consume returned invalid payload")
|
|
|
|
|
if payload.get("status") != "consumed":
|
|
|
|
|
raise DecisionError("approval consumption was not confirmed")
|
|
|
|
|
if payload.get("request_digest") != binding.request_digest:
|
|
|
|
|
raise DecisionError("approval consume digest does not match the request")
|
|
|
|
|
decision_id = payload.get("decision_id")
|
|
|
|
|
if decision_id is not None and (
|
|
|
|
|
not isinstance(decision_id, str) or not decision_id
|
|
|
|
|
):
|
|
|
|
|
raise DecisionError("approval consume returned an invalid decision id")
|
|
|
|
|
consumed_at = payload.get("consumed_at")
|
|
|
|
|
if consumed_at is not None and not isinstance(consumed_at, str):
|
|
|
|
|
raise DecisionError("approval consume returned an invalid consumed_at")
|
|
|
|
|
return ConsumedApproval(
|
|
|
|
|
approval_id=str(payload.get("approval_id") or approval_id),
|
|
|
|
|
request_digest=binding.request_digest,
|
|
|
|
|
decision_id=decision_id or binding.decision_id,
|
|
|
|
|
idempotent=bool(payload.get("idempotent")),
|
|
|
|
|
consumed_at=consumed_at or "",
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def require_production_consume(
|
|
|
|
|
cfg: Any,
|
|
|
|
|
entry: Any,
|
|
|
|
|
*,
|
|
|
|
|
binding: ConsumeBinding | None,
|
|
|
|
|
evidence: Any = None,
|
|
|
|
|
opener: Callable[..., Any] | None = None,
|
|
|
|
|
) -> ConsumedApproval | None:
|
|
|
|
|
"""CAS-consume before a production OpenBao call. No-op off the prod path.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Build/test remain fail-open relative to approval-engine. The three-factor
|
|
|
|
|
unsafe-demo exception is not a consume path. Missing binding, URL, or
|
|
|
|
|
credential fail closed so a stance bypass cannot reach OpenBao.
|
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
if getattr(entry, "stage", "") != "prod":
|
|
|
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
|
if demo_exception_enabled(cfg):
|
|
|
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
|
if binding is None:
|
|
|
|
|
raise DecisionError(
|
|
|
|
|
"production OpenBao call requires CAS consume of an approval "
|
|
|
|
|
"after an access-engine ALLOW; no durable consume binding is served"
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
base_url = str(getattr(cfg, "approval_url", "") or "")
|
|
|
|
|
token_file = getattr(cfg, "approval_token_file", None)
|
|
|
|
|
if not base_url:
|
|
|
|
|
raise DecisionError(
|
|
|
|
|
"production OpenBao call requires approval-engine consume; "
|
|
|
|
|
"SECRETS_ENGINE_APPROVAL_URL is unset"
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
if not token_file:
|
|
|
|
|
raise DecisionError(
|
|
|
|
|
"production OpenBao call requires approval-engine consume; "
|
|
|
|
|
"SECRETS_ENGINE_APPROVAL_TOKEN_FILE is unset"
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
consumed = consume_approval(
|
|
|
|
|
base_url=base_url,
|
|
|
|
|
token_file=Path(token_file),
|
|
|
|
|
binding=binding,
|
|
|
|
|
opener=opener or urlopen,
|
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
if evidence is not None and hasattr(evidence, "mark_consumed"):
|
|
|
|
|
evidence.mark_consumed(consumed)
|
|
|
|
|
return consumed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _status_message(status: int) -> str:
|
|
|
|
|
if status == 409:
|
|
|
|
|
return "approval consume conflict; OpenBao must not be called"
|
|
|
|
|
if status == 404:
|
|
|
|
|
return "approval not found; OpenBao must not be called"
|
|
|
|
|
if status in {401, 403}:
|
|
|
|
|
return "approval consume unauthorized; OpenBao must not be called"
|
|
|
|
|
if status == 503:
|
|
|
|
|
return "approval-engine unavailable; OpenBao must not be called"
|
|
|
|
|
if status == 0:
|
|
|
|
|
return "approval-engine unreachable; OpenBao must not be called"
|
|
|
|
|
return "approval consume failed; OpenBao must not be called"
|