diff --git a/docs/approval-consumption.md b/docs/approval-consumption.md
index 5ea5597..687c6f0 100644
--- a/docs/approval-consumption.md
+++ b/docs/approval-consumption.md
@@ -188,3 +188,14 @@ pins — and that pin has not been created, so the PDP call is not wired yet.
 - It does not render or cache an authorization decision.
 - It does not infer consumption from a decision record or from local
   evidence.
+
+
+### Native CLI authority and target correction — 2026-09-14
+
+The CLI now submits the catalog's explicit policy and AppRole targets, matching
+its frozen review inputs. After a valid native claim/PDP join, it retains the
+actual PDP decision id for evidence and still requires successful CAS consume.
+The catalog CCR reference remains provenance; the native path does not demand a
+second hub decision or local fixture with that CCR identifier. Unserved legacy
+build/test paths retain their existing review gate. Claim, PDP, human-control,
+stance, freshness and consume refusals still prevent backend access.
diff --git a/src/secrets_engine/approval_consume.py b/src/secrets_engine/approval_consume.py
index f86f419..47407ba 100644
--- a/src/secrets_engine/approval_consume.py
+++ b/src/secrets_engine/approval_consume.py
@@ -65,6 +65,11 @@ class AuthorizedAction:
     decision_id: str
     expires_at: str
 
+    @property
+    def id(self) -> str:
+        """The actual PDP decision id for shared CLI evidence/plan callers."""
+        return self.decision_id
+
     def as_evidence(self) -> dict[str, object]:
         return {
             "authorization_decision_id": self.decision_id,
diff --git a/src/secrets_engine/cli.py b/src/secrets_engine/cli.py
index 1b3ff26..6ed4fc5 100644
--- a/src/secrets_engine/cli.py
+++ b/src/secrets_engine/cli.py
@@ -126,7 +126,9 @@ def _require_lane_approval(
     # unreachable-engine residue inapplicable. Absent configuration returns
     # None and production stays closed exactly as before.
     authorization = authorize_action(
-        cfg, entry, action or "unknown", None, fields=fields
+        cfg, entry, action or "unknown", None, fields=fields,
+        policy_targets=(entry.policy_name,) if entry.has_delivery_auth else (),
+        auth_targets=(entry.role_name,) if entry.has_delivery_auth else (),
     )
     stance = apply_unreachable_engine_stance(
         cfg, entry, action or "unknown", authorized=authorization is not None
@@ -135,8 +137,11 @@ def _require_lane_approval(
         evidence.mark_stance(stance)
         if authorization is not None:
             evidence.detail.update(authorization.as_evidence())
-    decision = None
-    if entry.approval_required():
+    # A served claim/PDP decision is the native authority. The CCR reference
+    # remains provenance; the hub/fixture path is only the legacy fallback.
+    # Neither path can discharge the required native CAS below.
+    decision = authorization
+    if authorization is None and entry.approval_required():
         decision = resolve_decision(
             hub_url=cfg.hub_url,
             repo_root=repo_root(),
diff --git a/tests/test_approval_auth.py b/tests/test_approval_auth.py
index 077bb46..7d9ce7a 100644
--- a/tests/test_approval_auth.py
+++ b/tests/test_approval_auth.py
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ def test_cli_gate_exchanges_for_claim_and_consume(tmp_path, monkeypatch, failure
     monkeypatch.setattr(approval_auth, "credential_urlopen", exchange)
     cfg.approval_url = cfg.pdp_url = stub.url
     from secrets_engine.approval_consume import _expected_request
-    stub.bind_request(_expected_request(cfg, entry, "apply"))
+    stub.bind_request(_expected_request(cfg, entry, "apply", policy_targets=(entry.policy_name,), auth_targets=(entry.role_name,)))
     if failure == "conflict":
         stub.consume_status = 409
     try:
diff --git a/tests/test_approval_consume.py b/tests/test_approval_consume.py
index 446b1b8..519fbc9 100644
--- a/tests/test_approval_consume.py
+++ b/tests/test_approval_consume.py
@@ -359,3 +359,25 @@ def test_confirmed_consume_allows_openbao_resolve(tmp_path, monkeypatch):
     assert records[-1]["detail"]["approval_consumed"] is True
     assert records[-1]["detail"]["approval_id"] == "appr_test-1"
     assert TOKEN not in json.dumps(records)
+
+
+def test_native_human_control_uses_real_join_not_a_hub_fixture(tmp_path, monkeypatch):
+    entry = validate_entry(dict(VALID, stage="prod", approval={"model": "ccr",
+        "human_control": True, "decision_ref": "CCR-native-provenance"}))
+    authorized = _authorized()
+    monkeypatch.setattr(cli, "authorize_action", lambda *_a, **_k: authorized)
+    monkeypatch.setattr(cli, "apply_unreachable_engine_stance", _allow_prod_stance)
+    monkeypatch.setattr(cli, "resolve_decision", lambda **_k: pytest.fail("native authority must not resolve a legacy fixture"))
+    calls = []
+    def consume(cfg, actual, **kwargs):
+        assert kwargs["binding"] is authorized.binding
+        calls.append("consume")
+    monkeypatch.setattr(cli, "require_production_consume", consume)
+    result = cli._require_lane_approval(_config(tmp_path), entry, "apply")
+    assert result is authorized and result.id == authorized.decision_id
+    assert calls == ["consume"]
+    def refused(*_a, **_k):
+        raise DecisionError("consume refused")
+    monkeypatch.setattr(cli, "require_production_consume", refused)
+    with pytest.raises(DecisionError, match="consume refused"):
+        cli._require_lane_approval(_config(tmp_path), entry, "apply")
diff --git a/tests/test_integration_authorization.py b/tests/test_integration_authorization.py
index 33c7f44..8c9ce84 100644
--- a/tests/test_integration_authorization.py
+++ b/tests/test_integration_authorization.py
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ def _prime(stub, cfg, entry, action="apply"):
     """Tell the stub which exact request the engine will propose."""
     from secrets_engine.approval_consume import _expected_request
 
-    stub.bind_request(_expected_request(cfg, entry, action))
+    stub.bind_request(_expected_request(cfg, entry, action, policy_targets=(entry.policy_name,), auth_targets=(entry.role_name,)))
 
 
 def test_full_authorization_chain_reaches_openbao(bao_dev, stub, lane, tmp_path):
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ def test_full_authorization_chain_reaches_openbao(bao_dev, stub, lane, tmp_path)
     cfg = _cfg(tmp_path, catalog_dir, stub, addr)
     _prime(stub, cfg, entry)
 
-    authorization = authorize_action(cfg, entry, "apply", None)
+    authorization = authorize_action(cfg, entry, "apply", None, policy_targets=(entry.policy_name,), auth_targets=(entry.role_name,))
     assert authorization is not None
     assert authorization.decision_id == "decision:stub-apply"
     assert stub.calls == ["claim", "check"], "PIP then PDP, in that order"
diff --git a/tests/test_openrouter_binding.py b/tests/test_openrouter_binding.py
index 9ec69d6..25bab13 100644
--- a/tests/test_openrouter_binding.py
+++ b/tests/test_openrouter_binding.py
@@ -59,3 +59,26 @@ def test_openrouter_plan_exposes_all_limits_and_preserves_existing_custody():
         "token_ttl": "15m", "token_max_ttl": "30m", "token_num_uses": 8,
         "secret_id_ttl": "15m", "secret_id_num_uses": 1,
     }
+
+
+@pytest.mark.parametrize("action", ["apply", "verify", "exec"])
+def test_cli_submits_the_exact_reviewed_openrouter_targets(action, tmp_path, monkeypatch):
+    import json
+    from secrets_engine import cli
+    from secrets_engine.authorization import digest_material
+    from secrets_engine.config import Config
+    root = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1]
+    entry = load_entry(root / "docs/proposals/openrouter-key-check.yaml")
+    expected = json.loads((root / f"docs/evidence/2026-09-14-openrouter-final-{action}-request.json").read_text())
+    class Observed(Exception):
+        pass
+    def observe(cfg, actual_entry, actual_action, decision, **kwargs):
+        actual = build_action_request(actual_entry, actual_action,
+            subject_id="secrets-engine", subject_type="service",
+            purpose=actual_entry.approval["purpose"], **kwargs)
+        assert digest_material(actual) == digest_material(expected)
+        raise Observed
+    monkeypatch.setattr(cli, "authorize_action", observe)
+    with pytest.raises(Observed):
+        cli._require_lane_approval(Config.load(), entry, action,
+            fields=() if action == "apply" else tuple(entry.fields))
diff --git a/workplans/SECRETS-WP-0010-openrouter-native-access.md b/workplans/SECRETS-WP-0010-openrouter-native-access.md
index 483f821..066b1e6 100644
--- a/workplans/SECRETS-WP-0010-openrouter-native-access.md
+++ b/workplans/SECRETS-WP-0010-openrouter-native-access.md
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ type: workplan
 title: "Native OpenRouter access for intelligence-radar"
 domain: infotech
 repo: secrets-engine
-status: blocked
+status: active
 owner: codex
 topic_slug: netkingdom
 created: "2026-09-14"
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ and bounded plan are review artifacts, not runtime grants.
 
 ```task
 id: SECRETS-WP-0010-T03
-status: wait
+status: progress
 priority: high
 state_hub_task_id: "2aa6d2d3-bebc-5ae2-a04b-1bb2e9605405"
 ```
@@ -180,3 +180,19 @@ Repeatable contained helper: key-cape/tools/register-informed-decision.py
 (default preflight; --apply mutates only a missing exact registration).
 Human callback/MFA/token proof and T03 approval entries remain pending. The
 previous ready check established service health, not browser login acceptance.
+
+
+### Human approval and execution preparation — 2026-09-14
+
+The three native Approval Engine records are approved by the actual signed-in
+human uid=platform-root,ou=people,dc=netkingdom,dc=local, with one human entry each
+and no consumption at inspection. The exact action/memo IDs remain unchanged.
+Execution preflight found and corrected two CLI gaps: missing explicit policy/
+role targets, and an unnecessary hub/fixture lookup after an already validated
+native claim/PDP join. Real claim validation and mandatory CAS remain in place;
+unserved legacy review paths are unchanged. 414 regression tests passed, including
+frozen approved-request comparisons and consume-refusal/backend isolation.
+The attended owner procedure is in platform scripts/t03-native-execution.py and
+t03-attended-delivery.py. It uses the exact scoped client reader, contained
+platform administration, named/pinned native pods, private runtime storage, and
+native CLI handlers. No approval has yet been consumed by this preparation.