diff --git a/WORK-RECORDS.md b/WORK-RECORDS.md
index d80bbe3..fcde1c4 100644
--- a/WORK-RECORDS.md
+++ b/WORK-RECORDS.md
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
 | task | SECRETS-WP-0005-T07 | done | — | workplans/SECRETS-WP-0005-scope-intent-value-gaps.md |
 | task | SECRETS-WP-0006-T01 | done | — | workplans/SECRETS-WP-0006-catalog-lane-adoption.md |
 | task | SECRETS-WP-0006-T02 | done | — | workplans/SECRETS-WP-0006-catalog-lane-adoption.md |
-| task | SECRETS-WP-0006-T03 | progress | — | workplans/SECRETS-WP-0006-catalog-lane-adoption.md |
+| task | SECRETS-WP-0006-T03 | done | — | workplans/SECRETS-WP-0006-catalog-lane-adoption.md |
 | task | SECRETS-WP-0006-T04 | done | — | workplans/SECRETS-WP-0006-catalog-lane-adoption.md |
 | task | SECRETS-WP-0006-T05 | wait | — | workplans/SECRETS-WP-0006-catalog-lane-adoption.md |
 | task | SECRETS-WP-0006-T06 | wait | — | workplans/SECRETS-WP-0006-catalog-lane-adoption.md |
diff --git a/workplans/SECRETS-WP-0006-catalog-lane-adoption.md b/workplans/SECRETS-WP-0006-catalog-lane-adoption.md
index eabd684..f6cd04c 100644
--- a/workplans/SECRETS-WP-0006-catalog-lane-adoption.md
+++ b/workplans/SECRETS-WP-0006-catalog-lane-adoption.md
@@ -125,16 +125,21 @@ Acceptance:
 
 ```task
 id: SECRETS-WP-0006-T03
-status: progress
+status: done
 priority: high
 ```
 
-Progress 2026-08-21: the offered contribution did not arrive, so drafted all
+Completed 2026-08-21. The offered contribution did not arrive, so drafted all
 five entries from ops-warden playbooks and the authoritative railiance-platform
-CCRs. Sent message `ceace632-2332-46d8-a2b3-1714fbfa7e2c` requesting line-by-line
-confirmation of coordinates, fields, consumers, lifecycle owners, and proposed
-native delivery. T03 remains progress until that review returns; interim proxy
-ownership is unchanged.
+CCRs, then requested line-by-line review in message
+`ceace632-2332-46d8-a2b3-1714fbfa7e2c`. Ops-warden confirmed the mounts, paths,
+field sets, CCR references, consumers, lifecycle owners, existing workload
+delivery, proposed exact-path AppRole surface, both route rejections, and the
+delivery-mode correction in messages `26df37c5-2756-49b8-8f9c-c1bb2bab1b4b`
+and `3f875d90-6f88-4f44-961b-6f6fbd15b01d`. The follow-up retracted the only
+apparent metadata concern: `REUSE_SURFACE_FORGEJO_WEBHOOK_SECRET` is explicitly
+present in CCR-2026-0005, so both reuse-surface and issue-core remain correctly
+classified `high`. Interim proxy ownership remains unchanged until T05.
 
 Review ops-warden's proposed entries line by line against the schema, canonical
 security boundary, live route metadata, and owning workload documentation.