docs: record whynot-design lane pointer discrepancy from ops-warden
ops-warden (WARDEN-WP-0037-T01) reported the whynot-design npm lane as platform/workloads/coulomb/whynot-design/npm-publish, field NPM_AUTH_TOKEN. Reviewed without any OpenBao read or mutation: - The field claim conflates the injected env var (resolved by publication_policy) with the declared KV field (npm_token). Annotated the catalog so the distinction is explicit at the point of confusion. - The path claim is credible but unresolved: hardening-backlog already names both locations, and custody is owned by railiance-platform. Catalog mount/path left unchanged pending custody-side confirmation rather than rewriting a proven production lane from an inbox claim. Recorded under SECRETS-WP-0006-T06. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M65ovP3eiiPHubibvWs9mD Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 393550@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 4bb359f9-1f12-4410-9e76-079cf23c82e4
This commit is contained in:
parent
5cd4764f7e
commit
b61b575b5b
2 changed files with 39 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -22,6 +22,10 @@ mount: secret
|
|||
path: coulomb/whynot-design/npm/publish
|
||||
|
||||
# Field(s) inside the KV entry. The publish token is stored under this key.
|
||||
# NOTE: this is the KV field name, NOT the env var the value is injected as.
|
||||
# The injected name is resolved separately by the publication-scope policy and
|
||||
# is currently `NPM_AUTH_TOKEN` (see delivery_config.npm.maturity below and
|
||||
# docs/publication-scope-policy.md). Do not conflate the two.
|
||||
fields:
|
||||
- npm_token
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ status: active
|
|||
owner: codex
|
||||
topic_slug: custodian
|
||||
created: "2026-08-21"
|
||||
updated: "2026-09-03"
|
||||
updated: "2026-09-06"
|
||||
state_hub_workstream_id: "31f7f8ea-7f73-516c-8877-f03a13f1db82"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -260,6 +260,40 @@ Acceptance:
|
|||
- The generic OpenBao route and key-cape login route retain their correct
|
||||
owners.
|
||||
|
||||
Discrepancy report 2026-09-06 (ops-warden `fc898979`, WARDEN-WP-0037-T01).
|
||||
ops-warden reports the authoritative whynot-design npm concrete pointer as
|
||||
`platform/workloads/coulomb/whynot-design/npm-publish`, field `NPM_AUTH_TOKEN`,
|
||||
endpoint `https://forgejo.coulomb.social/api/packages/coulomb/npm/`. Reviewed
|
||||
here without any OpenBao read or mutation:
|
||||
|
||||
- Endpoint agrees. `catalog/whynot-design-npm-publish.yaml` already carries the
|
||||
Forgejo registry in `delivery_config.npm.registry`.
|
||||
- The field claim is a category error, not a repo defect. `NPM_AUTH_TOKEN` is
|
||||
the resolved *injection env var* from `publication_policy.resolve` (default
|
||||
template, repo-clamped while netkingdom is `maturity-build`), not a KV field
|
||||
name. The declared KV field is `npm_token`. `docs/whynot-design-real-publish-closeout.md`
|
||||
lists both rows separately. Renaming the catalog field to `NPM_AUTH_TOKEN`
|
||||
would break the proven pilot lane.
|
||||
- The path claim is credible and unresolved here. `docs/hardening-backlog.md`
|
||||
already records the value against *both* `whynot-design-npm-publish` and
|
||||
`platform/workloads/coulomb/whynot-design/npm-publish`, and every other
|
||||
admitted lane uses the `platform/workloads/...` convention. Which location is
|
||||
authoritative for reads is custody state owned by railiance-platform; this
|
||||
repo cannot confirm it without lane read authority, and production live
|
||||
commands remain fail-closed pending `SECRETS-WP-0007-T04`.
|
||||
|
||||
The catalog mount/path is therefore left unchanged pending a custody-side
|
||||
confirmation from railiance-platform. Rewriting a proven production lane pointer
|
||||
from an inbox claim is exactly the unverified custody mutation this task must
|
||||
not make. `ready: false` observed by ops-warden is the expected fail-closed
|
||||
result and is not evidence of a wrong path.
|
||||
|
||||
Next: obtain from railiance-platform a non-secret confirmation of which KV
|
||||
location backs this lane. If the platform path is authoritative, the catalog
|
||||
mount/path move is a reviewed lane change carrying its own approval, and the
|
||||
declared field stays `npm_token` unless custody says otherwise.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Exit criteria
|
||||
|
||||
- The five concrete OpenBao lanes have reviewed catalog entries and guarded
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue