feat: complete and prove the authorization chain end to end
Implements step 2 (access-engine POST /v1/check) and wires the whole GH-DEC-2026-003 sequence together, then proves it against a live throwaway OpenBao rather than only unit-level fakes. - decision_check.check_decision performs the PDP call; an unreachable or non-200 PDP raises, since silence is never permission. - approval_consume.authorize_action coordinates steps 1 and 2 and returns an AuthorizedAction. Both steps build the same CheckRequest via a shared _expected_request, since two descriptions of the action cannot produce corresponding digests. - apply_unreachable_engine_stance takes authorized=. The published map defines fail_closed as no side effect WITHOUT a durable decision record, so holding a validated one means the residue does not apply. Not a bypass: both steps must have succeeded and CAS consume still precedes OpenBao. Unconfigured still returns None and fails closed. The end-to-end test caught one more instance of the cross-vocabulary bug: a leftover comparison of the claim's binding.action against ours. The claim says secrets.kv.destroy where we say destroy, so it would have failed against every real claim. Removed; the tie is pdp_digest. Integration coverage asserts PIP-then-PDP ordering, that consume is the last step before the backend, and that an unreachable PDP, denied decision, invalid claim, missing pdp_digest, consume conflict and action mismatch each stop before OpenBao. 284 tests pass; production still fails closed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01M65ovP3eiiPHubibvWs9mD Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 393550@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 4bb359f9-1f12-4410-9e76-079cf23c82e4
This commit is contained in:
parent
e8144f315c
commit
f62d3fe789
9 changed files with 675 additions and 44 deletions
|
|
@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ import pytest
|
|||
|
||||
from secrets_engine import cli
|
||||
from secrets_engine.approval_consume import (
|
||||
AuthorizedAction,
|
||||
ConsumeBinding,
|
||||
consume_approval,
|
||||
require_production_consume,
|
||||
|
|
@ -79,6 +80,13 @@ def _http_error(status):
|
|||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _authorized():
|
||||
"""A completed steps 1+2 authorization, as the gate now expects."""
|
||||
return AuthorizedAction(
|
||||
binding=_binding(), decision_id="decision:test", expires_at="2026-09-06T12:00:00Z"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_resolve_consume_binding_is_unserved():
|
||||
assert resolve_consume_binding(object(), object(), "apply", None) is None
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -292,8 +300,8 @@ def test_consume_conflict_prevents_openbao(tmp_path, monkeypatch):
|
|||
monkeypatch.setattr(cli, "apply_unreachable_engine_stance", _allow_prod_stance)
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(
|
||||
cli,
|
||||
"resolve_consume_binding",
|
||||
lambda *_args, **_kwargs: _binding(),
|
||||
"authorize_action",
|
||||
lambda *_args, **_kwargs: _authorized(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(
|
||||
"secrets_engine.approval_consume.urlopen",
|
||||
|
|
@ -328,7 +336,7 @@ def test_confirmed_consume_allows_openbao_resolve(tmp_path, monkeypatch):
|
|||
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(cli, "get_entry", lambda *_args: entry)
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(cli, "apply_unreachable_engine_stance", _allow_prod_stance)
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(cli, "resolve_consume_binding", lambda *_args, **_kwargs: _binding())
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(cli, "authorize_action", lambda *_args, **_kwargs: _authorized())
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr("secrets_engine.approval_consume.urlopen", opener)
|
||||
monkeypatch.delenv("SECRETS_ENGINE_UNSAFE_DEMO", raising=False)
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue