#!/usr/bin/env bash # Wire up a REAL `npm publish` through secrets-engine exec — in dry-run, so the # tarball is built and the publish path is exercised end to end WITHOUT actually # uploading to the registry. # # Chain: boot throwaway OpenBao -> apply lane -> provision a (fake) token -> # `secrets-engine exec --catalog ... -- npm publish --dry-run`. # # Proves: npm in the child resolves its auth token from the temp .npmrc that # secrets-engine injected; the parent shell never holds the token. set -euo pipefail REPO="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")/.." && pwd)" cd "$REPO" # shellcheck disable=SC1091 source .venv/bin/activate BAO_BIN="$(command -v bao)" WORK="$(mktemp -d)" export BAO_ADDR="http://127.0.0.1:8271" export BAO_TOKEN="se-npm-demo-root" export SECRETS_ENGINE_HUB_URL="" # offline; uses local decision fixture TOKENFILE="$WORK/whynot.token" PKG="$WORK/pkg" cleanup() { set +e [[ -n "${BAO_PID:-}" ]] && kill "$BAO_PID" 2>/dev/null rm -rf "$WORK" } trap cleanup EXIT echo "### boot throwaway OpenBao" "$BAO_BIN" server -dev -dev-root-token-id="$BAO_TOKEN" \ -dev-listen-address="127.0.0.1:8271" >"$WORK/bao.log" 2>&1 & BAO_PID=$! for _ in $(seq 1 30); do "$BAO_BIN" status -address="$BAO_ADDR" >/dev/null 2>&1 && break; sleep 0.2 done echo "### apply lane metadata + provision a (fake) npm token" secrets-engine apply whynot-design-npm-publish --stage prod >/dev/null printf 'npm_FAKEtokenFORdryRUNonly1234567890' > "$TOKENFILE" chmod 600 "$TOKENFILE" secrets-engine provision whynot-design-npm-publish --stage prod \ --field npm_token --from-file "$TOKENFILE" >/dev/null echo " lane ready: $(secrets-engine route whynot-design-npm-publish --json | python3 -c 'import sys,json;print("ready="+str(json.load(sys.stdin)["ready"]))')" echo "### create a scratch npm package" mkdir -p "$PKG" # Scratch package uses the @whynot scope so it maps to the coulomb Gitea npm # registry that secrets-engine injects (same scope as the real @whynot/design). cat > "$PKG/package.json" <<'EOF' { "name": "@whynot/se-pilot-scratch", "version": "0.0.1", "description": "Scratch package proving secrets-engine exec -> npm publish wiring (dry-run).", "license": "MIT", "publishConfig": { "access": "public" } } EOF echo 'module.exports = () => "secrets-engine pilot";' > "$PKG/index.js" echo "### run npm publish --dry-run THROUGH secrets-engine exec" echo " (token injected into the npm child via a temp .npmrc; parent never sees it)" cd "$PKG" # A small wrapper proves the child resolved the auth token, then runs the real # npm publish --dry-run. The token value itself is never printed. cat > "$WORK/npm-wrapped.sh" <<'EOF' #!/usr/bin/env bash set -e # secrets-engine pointed npm at a temp userconfig holding the auth token. # (npm itself hides _authToken from `npm config get`, so check the file npm uses.) if [[ -n "${NPM_CONFIG_USERCONFIG:-}" ]] && grep -q '_authToken' "$NPM_CONFIG_USERCONFIG"; then echo " [child] npm userconfig injected with an auth token: yes (value hidden)" echo " [child] config file: $NPM_CONFIG_USERCONFIG" else echo " [child] npm has NO injected auth token"; exit 1 fi exec npm publish --dry-run EOF chmod +x "$WORK/npm-wrapped.sh" secrets-engine exec --catalog whynot-design-npm-publish -- "$WORK/npm-wrapped.sh" echo echo "### confirm parent shell never held the token" echo " SE_NPM_TOKEN in parent: '${SE_NPM_TOKEN:-}'" echo " NPM_CONFIG_USERCONFIG in parent: '${NPM_CONFIG_USERCONFIG:-}'" echo echo "### DONE — npm publish (dry-run) ran with the token injected by secrets-engine." echo " For a REAL publish, provision a real npm automation token the same way" echo " and drop --dry-run from the wrapped command."