coulomb/security-canon
5
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
security-canon/infospace/mappings
History
Exact
tegwick 7e2de19dc6 Close the section 32 generalisation as accepted upstream 
InfoTechCanon reviewed the demand signal separately and accepted option B as
INFO-DEC-2026-001: the CARING section 32 role set now applies wherever a
subject's access is exercised through another party, rather than to non-human
subjects only. CARING moves to canon version 0.4.0-RC2-itc2.

The change is additive and no SecurityCanon declaration moves. The blank cell in
the mapping table stands: InfoTechCanon's access-control model still has no
on-behalf-of relation.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: opus
Assistant-Process: 3588@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 24b80f66-e5a7-4e61-99fe-2d422e6d17da
2026-09-20 23:54:12 +02:00
..
infotechcanon-authority-survey.md Survey where InfoTechCanon already speaks about authority (T03) 2026-09-20 22:39:21 +02:00
mode-of-authority-to-infotechcanon.md Close the section 32 generalisation as accepted upstream 2026-09-20 23:54:12 +02:00