2026-08-09 21:38:36 +02:00
|
|
|
|
# Identity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2026-08-12 00:55:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
**Status:** revised (Phase I, 2026-08-12)
|
|
|
|
|
|
**See also:** RQ5, H6, TE-02–TE-05, TE-08, RN-004, RN-005
|
2026-08-09 21:38:36 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
2026-08-12 00:55:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
## Disambiguation
|
2026-08-09 21:38:36 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
2026-08-12 00:55:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
| Question | Soul Frame term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Same entity over time? | **Identity** (numerical / reidentification) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| What continues? | **Continuity** (may branch) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Historical relatedness after branch? | **Lineage** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| What is it like? | **Characterization** (narrative/character) |
|
2026-08-09 21:38:36 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
2026-08-12 00:55:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Identity ≠ Continuity ≠ Lineage ≠ Character.
|
2026-08-09 21:38:36 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
2026-08-12 00:55:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
## Core formulation
|
2026-08-09 21:38:36 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
2026-08-12 00:55:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
> A Being continues not because its state remains the same, but because its
|
|
|
|
|
|
> changes remain part of one appropriately connected history of self-individuation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
> When that history branches, identity becomes lineage.
|
2026-08-09 21:38:36 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
2026-08-12 00:55:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
## Continuity profile (constitutive dimensions)
|
2026-08-09 21:38:36 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
2026-08-12 00:55:09 +02:00
|
|
|
|
Causal, organizational, psychological, autobiographical/narrative, normative,
|
|
|
|
|
|
relational.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Anchors / evidence (not constitutive alone):** provenance, address, substrate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Topology labels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`CONTINUOUS | DEGRADED | UNCERTAIN | SUCCESSOR | FORKED | RECONSTRUCTED | USURPED | TERMINATED`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Implications for artificial systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Actor/Body replacement can preserve identity (substrate independence + continuity dependence).
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Sameness of data is not sameness of Being.
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Forks require governance; perfect copy while original continues yields FORKED lineage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Ghosts default to authorized succession/representation, not automatic numerical identity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Explicit identity governance is required because state is inspectable, copyable, editable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Sources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`research/foundations/004-identity-and-continuity.md`
|
|
|
|
|
|
`research/foundations/ResearchNote005-IdentityContinuityStressTest.md`
|
|
|
|
|
|
Locke; Parfit; Olson SEP; process identity literature
|