coulomb/soul-frame
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Complete Phase V Spirits and Ghosts (SOUL-WP-0006)

Browse source 
Formalize Sp. evaluation dimensions and Gh. authority/governance; map law gaps
without legal conclusions; support H9/H10; confirm TE-07. Write phase-v
synthesis, finish SOUL-WP-0006, and mark SOUL-WP-0007 ready.
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-08-12 01:36:14 +02:00
parent 7525ef030c
commit 0bec48ab33
16 changed files with 690 additions and 78 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

35
Claims.md
View file

@ -199,30 +199,33 @@ Claim: Agent, Spirit, and Ghost should not automatically be treated as mutually
Soul Frame concept: Agent, Spirit, Ghost
Supporting literature:
- RN-003 Sp./Gh. cases; RN-005 SF-C053/C054 (new lineage vs authorized succession)
- Phase IV crosswalk: Functional Agent and APE stack under same Being dimensions
- research/ai-agents/agent-architecture-crosswalk.md
Contradicting literature: market taxonomies treating “AI agent” as ontological kind
- Phase IV agent/APE crosswalk; Phase V Sp./Gh. maps and synthesis
- Combinatorial use: Agent+Sp., Gh.+Persona policies (Introduction §11)
Contradicting literature: market taxonomies treating labels as exclusive species
Adjacent terminology: digital human, companion, generative agent, posthumous avatar
Evidence strength: moderate (Agent side strong; Sp./Gh. full pass Phase V)
Open questions: RQ8 hybrids; Sp./Gh. authority details
Required refinement: typology vs dimensions
Status: under review (Agent/APE side strengthened Phase IV)
Evidence strength: moderate → strong (conceptual)
Open questions: hybrid display conventions
Required refinement: keep as dimensions/provenance, not exclusive kinds
Status: supported (Phase V)
```
### H10 — Ghosthood requires authority
```text
Claim: Technical fidelity alone is insufficient for legitimate Gh. status.
Claim: Technical fidelity alone is insufficient for legitimate Gh. status;
authority is required.
Soul Frame concept: Ghost
Supporting literature:
- RN-005 False Ghost / usurpation / provenance forgery cases
- Digital afterlife ethics literature (pointer; Phase V)
Contradicting literature: (pending)
Adjacent terminology: personality rights, consent, fiduciary duty
Evidence strength: moderate conceptually; legal map pending Phase V
Open questions: succession, commercial use
Required refinement: governance model for Ghosts
Status: under review
- Introduction §10; TE-07; RN-005 False Ghost / usurpation / forgery
- Spitale & Germani digital ghost ethics; Lei et al. AI afterlife expectations
- research/ghosts-digital-legacy/ghost-authority-map.md
- law gap sketch (adjacency, not identity of legal and Soul Frame authority)
Contradicting literature: folk “if it acts like them”; unauthorized deepfakes
Adjacent terminology: consent, personality rights, fiduciary duty, digital remains
Evidence strength: moderate → strong (conceptual + ethics lit)
Open questions: succession instruments; commercial Gh.; OQ-040 rare continuation
Required refinement: governance charter elements
Status: supported (Phase V)
```
---