Update SCOPE to actual repo state; add scope-vs-intent gap assessment; open SOUL-WP-0011

- SCOPE.md now reflects Phases I-IX complete, paper draft with decided
  pathway, companion line, and metrics groundwork; current work surface
  and sharpened out-of-scope table
- history/260928-scope-intent-gap-assessment.md assesses state against
  INTENT's six determinations and success criterion; gap register G1-G7,
  ranking G1 (sufficiency/weighting), G2 (coverage matrix), G3 (Soul
  packaging) as most relevant addressable gaps
- SOUL-WP-0011 opened to address G1-G3 (three tasks)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: sonnet
Assistant-Process: 234768@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 91cdb0c1-a203-431c-b542-cf192b3930a6
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-09-28 20:38:53 +02:00
parent 6d2c4833a8
commit 5a8a5a2d2d
3 changed files with 206 additions and 14 deletions

View file

@ -5,14 +5,16 @@
> It is intentionally lightweight and may be incomplete.
>
> Aspirational charter: `INTENT.md` · Research agenda: `ResearchProgram.md` ·
> Conceptual draft: `SoulFrameIntroduction.md`
> Conceptual draft: `SoulFrameIntroduction.md` ·
> Scope-vs-intent gap assessment: `history/260928-scope-intent-gap-assessment.md`
---
## One-liner
A systems-theoretic research program and conceptual framework for person-like
informational beings (Body = Action, Mind = Model, Soul = Relation).
informational beings (Body = Action, Mind = Model, Soul = Relation) — through
its foundational phases and holding a research-grounded paper draft.
---
@ -29,19 +31,44 @@ Central question:
---
## In Scope
## What the repo actually holds (as of 2026-09-28)
- Conceptual systems analysis of Being, Body, Mind, Soul, identity, personhood,
character, persona, actor, recognition, Agent / Spirit (`Sp.`) / Ghost (`Gh.`)
- Literature mapping across systems theory, cybernetics, philosophy of mind,
personal identity, cognitive science, sociology, AI agents, digital legacy, law,
and cultural precedents
- Research instruments: terminology standard, claim ledger, open questions,
thought experiments, concept notes, annotated bibliography
- Progressive synthesis and a research-grounded Soul Frame paper
- State Hub–indexed workplans coordinating the research sequence
Phases I–IX are complete (SOUL-WP-0001 … SOUL-WP-0010, all finished):
---
- **Concept set** — 13 working definitions in `concepts/` plus three criteria
documents (`concepts/criteria/`), including itemized B1–B8 (autonomous
individuality) and P1–P12 (descriptive personhood) profiles
- **Research instruments** — `Terminology.md`, `Claims.md` (H1–H10, all
supported/revised through phase review), `OpenQuestions.md` (RQ1–RQ8 with
working answers; itemized OQ registers), `ThoughtExperiments.md` (TE-01–09+
with working judgments)
- **Literature base** — `sources/bibliography.md` (SF-R### ledger),
discipline-organized maps under `research/` for all 13 workstreams touched
so far, five phase syntheses plus `research/research-synthesis.md`
- **Paper** — `paper/draft.md`: first research-grounded draft, adversarially
reviewed (SOUL-WP-0009), publication pathway decided: internal circulation
as **paper-one for coulomb-research**, then pre-print → journal
- **Companion line (moral/legal)** — charter
(`research/law-governance/moral-legal-personhood-charter.md`) plus first
slice executed (legal personhood precedent survey); items 2–4 unstarted
- **Metrics groundwork** — measurability scoping across all axes
(`research/metrics-scoping-note.md`) and instrument scoping for B3 +
psychological continuity; instrument *build* is founder-gated (open hub
decision `0401cf28`)
## In Scope (current work surface)
- Refining weighting/sufficiency questions for the B-, P-, and continuity
profiles (RQ1/RQ2/RQ5 residuals; paper §17 item 2)
- Exercising INTENT's success criterion: applying the full vocabulary across
the nine reference entity types with meaningful distinctions
- Resolving paper-critical packaging questions (e.g. Soul: relations vs
consequences, RQ4 remainder)
- Further companion-line slices (charter items 2–4) and law/governance
deepening — under the charter's own gates
- Instrument development for scoped metrics — only after decision `0401cf28`
is resolved
- Carrying the paper through the coulomb-research internal-circulation stage
## Out of Scope
@ -50,8 +77,9 @@ Central question:
| Production agent runtime / harness | agent-harness, activity-core, runtime repos |
| LLM provider routing and tooling | llm-connect, related infra |
| Claiming to solve consciousness | philosophy programs; not a gate here |
| Silent moral/legal personhood claims | law/governance literature map only; no premature derivation |
| Silent moral/legal personhood claims | companion line only (charter-gated); no premature derivation |
| Shipping product features as primary deliverable | downstream architecture repos after conceptual clarity |
| "Practical architecture for artificial beings" (INTENT det. 6b) | downstream repos; conceptual clarity feeds it, this repo does not build it |
---