Implement SOUL-WP-0011: sufficiency position, coverage matrix, Soul packaging

- T01: research/sufficiency-and-weighting-position.md — reject universal
  weights; necessity core (B1/B3), claim-relative P minimal profiles,
  continuity configuration classes with causal privilege; OpenQuestions
  RQ1/RQ2/RQ5 weighting bullets positioned
- T02: research/coverage-matrix.md — nine INTENT entity types under the
  full vocabulary; success criterion verdict: pass with two strain points
- T03: concepts/soul.md packaging resolved (enacted vs residual Soul);
  RQ4 no longer carries a paper-critical open item
- SCOPE.md work-surface bullets updated; workplan finished

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: sonnet
Assistant-Process: 234768@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 91cdb0c1-a203-431c-b542-cf192b3930a6

OpenQuestions.md

@@ -15,7 +15,9 @@ indexed below.
 Working answer: multi-layer profile (autonomous individuality + personhood +
 addressability + recognition). Still open:
 
-- Weighting and thresholds of B1–B8
+- ~~Weighting and thresholds of B1–B8~~ **positioned 2026-09-28:** necessity
+  core (B1·B3) + compensable remainder, no cardinal weights —
+  `research/sufficiency-and-weighting-position.md` §2
 - Observer-relative individuation without arbitrariness
 - Nested levels (colony, collective, multi-Body)
 - **Deppert dialogue:** are *kulturelle Lebewesen* (firms, states, clubs) living
@@ -28,7 +30,9 @@ addressability + recognition). Still open:
 P1–P12; four kinds (descriptive/social/moral/legal); default = descriptive.
 Remaining:
 
-- Weighting / sufficiency thresholds for Beinghood v0.2
+- ~~Weighting / sufficiency thresholds for Beinghood v0.2~~ **positioned
+  2026-09-28:** claim-relative minimal profiles, no threshold score —
+  `research/sufficiency-and-weighting-position.md` §3
 - Moral and legal maps (explicitly deferred)
 - Measurement methods for artificial systems
 
@@ -53,16 +57,23 @@ architecture adopted provisionally. Remaining:
 boundary removed; Ghost may inherit Soul-relational structure without identity.
 **Resolved 2026-09-28 (SOUL-WP-0009-T01):** retain “Soul” for the Relation
 dimension, with the non-metaphysical disclaimer kept explicit wherever the
-term appears. **Still open (paper-critical):**
+term appears.
+**Resolved 2026-09-28 (SOUL-WP-0011-T03):** packaging — both relations and
+consequences, as **enacted** vs **residual** modes of one dimension;
+Cluster D inheritance = residual Soul taken up for re-enactment under
+authority (see `concepts/soul.md` § Packaging). Remaining (no longer
+paper-critical):
 
-- Packaging: relations vs consequences vs both
-- Formal Cluster D depth beyond Phase V inheritance claim
+- Formal Cluster D depth beyond the inheritance-mechanism naming
+- Residual Soul under forks (moved from concepts/soul.md open issues)
 
 ## RQ5 — How does identity persist?
 
 **Phase I status:** structure clarified (Identity ≠ Continuity ≠ Lineage); open:
 
-- Continuity weighting (OQ-043)
+- ~~Continuity weighting (OQ-043)~~ **positioned 2026-09-28:** configuration
+  classes with causal privilege, no channel arithmetic —
+  `research/sufficiency-and-weighting-position.md` §4
 - Dormancy ontology (OQ-046/047)
 - Fork rights and relationship branching (OQ-050/051)
 - Ghost authority and gradual transition (OQ-052/053)