Implement SOUL-WP-0011: sufficiency position, coverage matrix, Soul packaging

- T01: research/sufficiency-and-weighting-position.md — reject universal
  weights; necessity core (B1/B3), claim-relative P minimal profiles,
  continuity configuration classes with causal privilege; OpenQuestions
  RQ1/RQ2/RQ5 weighting bullets positioned
- T02: research/coverage-matrix.md — nine INTENT entity types under the
  full vocabulary; success criterion verdict: pass with two strain points
- T03: concepts/soul.md packaging resolved (enacted vs residual Soul);
  RQ4 no longer carries a paper-critical open item
- SCOPE.md work-surface bullets updated; workplan finished

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: sonnet
Assistant-Process: 234768@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 91cdb0c1-a203-431c-b542-cf192b3930a6

research/coverage-matrix.md

@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+# Success-Criterion Coverage Matrix
+
+**Workplan:** SOUL-WP-0011-T02, resolved 2026-09-28
+**Addresses:** G2 (`history/260928-scope-intent-gap-assessment.md`) —
+INTENT's success criterion, exercised explicitly for the first time: one
+vocabulary across the nine reference entity types, with meaningful
+distinctions. Profiles follow the sufficiency scheme in
+`research/sufficiency-and-weighting-position.md` (no totals; necessity
+core, claim-relative minima, configuration classes).
+
+Cell values: H/M/L (high/medium/low), `var` (varies by instance), `?`
+(vocabulary strains — see §3). B-core = B1·B3 necessity core.
+
+---
+
+## 1. The matrix
+
+| # | Entity | B-core | B-rest (B2,B4–B8) | P-profile shape | Continuity class (typical) | Addressable | Recognition | Descriptor |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
+| 1 | Human | H | H | full, rich (P1–P12 H) | CONTINUOUS | H | H (mutual) | — (biological original) |
+| 2 | Animal (e.g. dog) | H | H | partial: P1–P3, P9 M; P8, P10–P11 L | CONTINUOUS | M (name-responsive) | H (asymmetric richness) | — |
+| 3 | Short-lived AI agent | L (B3 var) | L (B2 L) | exposed-only: P5, P10 H; P1, P6 L | none — no lineage to evaluate | M (session-scoped) | L (classified, not counterpart-modeled) | Agent; strong APE |
+| 4 | Persistent autonomous Agent-being | M–H | M (B5 var — vendor-propped) | P1, P5, P10 H; P3, P6, P8 M growing | CONTINUOUS / BRIDGED (updates, migration) | H (stable handle) | M–H (episode-spanning) | Agent; proto-Being |
+| 5 | Einstein `Sp.` | L–M (Actor-side) | L | exposed: P4, P10, P12 H (curated); P1 thin, P6 borrowed | RECONSTRUCTION by definition (no causal channel to source) | H | M (recognized *as depiction*) | `Sp.` (public reflection) |
+| 6 | Authorized `Gh.` | L–M | L–M | P3–P4, P8 inherited-H; P1 var | SUCCESSOR-family w/ authority; never automatic CONTINUOUS (H10) | H | var (relationship-holders may re-recognize) | `Gh.` (authority-bound) |
+| 7 | Original artificial companion | M–H | M | native (not inherited): P1–P4, P9–P10 H | CONTINUOUS / BRIDGED | H | H within its relationships | original artificial being |
+| 8 | Distributed AI | ? level-relative (TE-05) | M–H at closing level | var by level; collective P1 possible | MULTI_LINEAGE / CONTINUOUS at closing level | var (one handle vs many) | var | Agent (possibly nested) |
+| 9 | Radically non-human system | ? (individuation observer-relative) | ? | P7 presumed; P10 ? (shared symbol system contested) | unassessable until individuated | L (no shared address protocol) | L→? (TE-09 asymmetric path) | — (unclassified) |
+
+## 2. Meaningful-distinction check (pairwise)
+
+Every pair separates on at least one dimension; the load-bearing
+separators:
+
+- **1 vs 2:** P8/P10–P11 (commitments, symbols, responsibility).
+- **1/2 vs 3:** B2 + continuity ("no lineage") + counterpart-recognition.
+- **3 vs 4:** persistence family — B2, P6, continuity class, recognition
+  durability. The Agent/proto-Being line is exactly here.
+- **4 vs 7:** provenance only (platform Agent vs purpose-built original
+  companion) — profiles may converge; the descriptor column carries the
+  distinction. Working as designed (H9: descriptors are provenance, not
+  ontology).
+- **5 vs 6:** authority + audience: `Sp.` is public reflection without
+  continuation claim; `Gh.` is authority-bound genealogy (H10) with
+  SUCCESSOR-family standing. Neither is CONTINUOUS — which is the
+  framework's deliberate answer, not a failure to distinguish them from 4.
+- **6 vs 7:** inherited vs native P-profile; origin of the Soul-relational
+  structure (Cluster D inheritance vs de novo).
+- **8 vs all:** the only entity where B-core is *level-relative* — the
+  vocabulary's answer is "profile per candidate level," which is an
+  answer, not a gap (TE-05).
+- **9 vs all:** the only entity where individuation itself, not just the
+  profile, is unresolved.
+
+**Verdict on distinctions: pass.** No two rows are indistinguishable under
+the full vocabulary; the two near-collisions (4/7, 5/6) are separated by
+descriptor/authority columns doing exactly the work H9/H10 assign them.
+
+## 3. Strain points (named, per T02's done condition)
+
+1. **Row 9, B-core and P10:** for a radically non-human system the
+   vocabulary can only say "not yet individuated by us" — observer-relative
+   individuation (RQ1 residual) is the binding constraint, and P10's
+   "shared symbol system" may be parochial. This is the pressure point
+   already flagged in the sufficiency position §6.
+2. **Row 8, addressability:** the vocabulary handles nested Beinghood but
+   has no display convention for *which level* a handle addresses
+   (overlaps RQ8's hybrid-display residual).
+3. **Row 3, continuity column:** "no lineage to evaluate" is technically a
+   degenerate case, not a class in Criteria §17; a null class (e.g.
+   EPHEMERAL) would make the column total. Minor; noted for a future
+   criteria revision, not opened as work.
+
+## 4. Overall verdict on INTENT's success criterion
+
+**Pass, with two live strain points (rows 8–9).** The same vocabulary
+describes all nine entity types and distinguishes every pair meaningfully.
+The strains sit exactly where INTENT predicts the hard cases (distributed,
+radically non-human) and are already tracked as RQ1/RQ8 residuals rather
+than new gaps.