Complete Phase II interaction (SOUL-WP-0003)
Map model-based mind, co-adaptive social cognition, and recognition/social Beinghood into instruments and workstream notes. Support H3/H4/H7, judge TE-09, write phase-ii-interaction-synthesis.md, finish SOUL-WP-0003, and mark SOUL-WP-0004 ready.
This commit is contained in:
parent
cb40f77e5a
commit
807d6b17f6
15 changed files with 772 additions and 81 deletions
55
Claims.md
55
Claims.md
|
|
@ -64,17 +64,19 @@ Soul Frame concept: Mind
|
|||
Supporting literature:
|
||||
- Ashby 1956 (regulation)
|
||||
- Conant & Ashby 1970 (Good Regulator Theorem)
|
||||
- Predictive processing / active inference traditions (pointer; Phase II/III)
|
||||
- RN-001 Findings 4–6
|
||||
- Clark 2016 Surfing Uncertainty; Hohwy 2013 Predictive Mind
|
||||
- Friston active inference literature (with Markov-blanket cautions)
|
||||
- Baker, Saxe & Tenenbaum 2009 (inverse planning)
|
||||
- RN-001 Findings 4–6; research/cognitive-science/mind-as-model-map.md
|
||||
Contradicting literature:
|
||||
- Anti-representational / radical enactivist critiques of “model” talk
|
||||
- Consciousness-first theories of mind
|
||||
Adjacent terminology: regulator, model, predictive processing, enaction
|
||||
Evidence strength: moderate → approaching strong for control-theoretic reading;
|
||||
mixed if “model” is read as explicit internal representation only
|
||||
Adjacent terminology: regulator, generative model, predictive processing, enaction
|
||||
Evidence strength: strong for control-theoretic / generative-model reading;
|
||||
mixed if “model” is restricted to explicit propositional representation only
|
||||
Open questions: OQ-055 definition of model; embodied non-representational cases
|
||||
Required refinement: define “model” inclusively enough for regulation + social cognition
|
||||
Status: supported (Phase I)
|
||||
Required refinement: model = action-guiding revisable structure (inclusive)
|
||||
Status: supported (Phase II)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### H4 — Social cognition is co-adaptive
|
||||
|
|
@ -82,19 +84,20 @@ Status: supported (Phase I)
|
|||
```text
|
||||
Claim: Persistent interaction between beings produces recursively adapting models
|
||||
of self, other, and relationship.
|
||||
Soul Frame concept: Co-adaptive model building, Mind
|
||||
Soul Frame concept: Co-adaptive model building, Mind, Social Mind (SM1–SM8)
|
||||
Supporting literature:
|
||||
- Mead 1934; Pickering & Garrod 2004; Clark & Brennan 1991; Tomasello et al. 2005
|
||||
- De Jaegher & Di Paolo 2007; I-POMDP / recursive agent modeling
|
||||
- RN-006 synthesis
|
||||
- De Jaegher & Di Paolo 2007/2010; Schilbach et al. 2013
|
||||
- Baker et al. 2009; Gmytrasiewicz & Doshi 2005 (I-POMDP)
|
||||
- RN-006 full synthesis; research/social-cognition/co-adaptive-model-building.md
|
||||
Contradicting literature: purely individualistic Theory-of-Mind accounts that
|
||||
underplay interaction dynamics
|
||||
underplay interaction dynamics; narrow “no model” enactivism
|
||||
Adjacent terminology: theory of mind, interactive alignment, common ground,
|
||||
participatory sense-making
|
||||
Evidence strength: moderate (Phase II will own full pass; Phase I notes support direction)
|
||||
participatory sense-making, second-person cognition
|
||||
Evidence strength: moderate → strong (as synthesis; not a single-lab empirical law)
|
||||
Open questions: OQ-055–068 in RN-006
|
||||
Required refinement: co-adaptation ≠ model exchange
|
||||
Status: under review (promising; Phase II)
|
||||
Required refinement: co-adaptation ≠ model exchange; conflict/deception included
|
||||
Status: supported (Phase II)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### H5 — Soul can be operationalized relationally
|
||||
|
|
@ -150,14 +153,20 @@ Claim: Being recognized as a persistent counterpart changes the systemic role of
|
|||
autonomous individuality.
|
||||
Soul Frame concept: Recognition, Social Beinghood
|
||||
Supporting literature:
|
||||
- RN-001 Findings 8–10 (three senses of recognition; recognition ≠ create Being)
|
||||
- Mead; intentional stance literature (pointer)
|
||||
Contradicting literature: strong social-construction-only accounts of existence
|
||||
Adjacent terminology: recognition theory, intentional stance, intersubjectivity
|
||||
Evidence strength: moderate for distinction; Phase II sociology pass pending
|
||||
Open questions: RQ6; TE-09 Unrecognized Intelligence
|
||||
Required refinement: epistemic vs intentional vs social recognition
|
||||
Status: revised (Phase I clarification)
|
||||
- RN-001 Findings 8–10 (three senses; recognition ≠ create systemic Being)
|
||||
- Mead 1934; Dennett intentional stance; Honneth recognition theory
|
||||
- Schilbach et al. 2013 (second-person interaction)
|
||||
- research/sociology/recognition-and-social-beinghood.md; TE-09 judgment
|
||||
Contradicting literature: strong social-construction-only accounts of existence;
|
||||
unrestricted “recognition creates Being”
|
||||
Adjacent terminology: recognition theory, intentional stance, intersubjectivity,
|
||||
trust, reputation
|
||||
Evidence strength: moderate
|
||||
Open questions: RQ6 packaging of recognition inside Beinghood v0.2; moral vs
|
||||
descriptive recognition (Phase III)
|
||||
Required refinement: epistemic vs intentional vs social recognition; false
|
||||
positives from intentional stance
|
||||
Status: supported / refined (Phase II)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### H8 — Persona is a projection rather than an identity
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -29,15 +29,19 @@ for Beinghood established (daemon false positive).
|
|||
|
||||
## RQ3 — What constitutes a Mind?
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase I status:** model-based reading supported (H3); remaining:
|
||||
**Phase II status:** model-based reading **supported** (H3); Social Mind SM1–SM8
|
||||
architecture adopted provisionally. Remaining:
|
||||
|
||||
- Precise definition of “model” (OQ-055)
|
||||
- Minimal apparatus; recursive social depth
|
||||
- Relation to RN-006 model families SM1–SM8
|
||||
- Precise definition of “model” (OQ-055) — inclusive working def in concepts/mind.md
|
||||
- Minimal apparatus for non-social vs social Mind
|
||||
- Recursive depth for personhood (OQ-056)
|
||||
- When common ground becomes collective Mind (OQ-067)
|
||||
|
||||
## RQ4 — What constitutes a Soul?
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase I status:** revised definition (boundary removed); **not closed**.
|
||||
**Phase I–II status:** revised definition (boundary removed); **not closed**.
|
||||
Phase II ends by pointing to Cluster D: what persists from interactions beyond
|
||||
immediate models (relational persistence = Soul’s domain).
|
||||
|
||||
- Rename vs retain “Soul”
|
||||
- Packaging: relations vs consequences vs both
|
||||
|
|
@ -55,10 +59,13 @@ for Beinghood established (daemon false positive).
|
|||
|
||||
## RQ6 — How does recognition create social beinghood?
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase I status:** recognition disambiguated; social vs systemic clarified.
|
||||
**Phase II status:** **refined answer available** — recognition constitutive of
|
||||
*social* Beinghood, not bare autonomous individuality; three senses fixed;
|
||||
TE-09 judged. Remaining:
|
||||
|
||||
- TE-09: is recognition constitutive of Being or only Social Being?
|
||||
- Minimal recognition conditions
|
||||
- Exact label policy for Beinghood v0.2 vs “autonomous individual”
|
||||
- Minimal intentional vs social recognition conditions
|
||||
- Moral/legal recognition deferred to Phase III
|
||||
|
||||
## RQ7 — What is character?
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -86,7 +93,7 @@ succession; Agent functional vs autonomous split. Full typology Phase IV–V.
|
|||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Resolved / refined (Phase I)
|
||||
## Resolved / refined (Phase I–II)
|
||||
|
||||
| Item | Disposition | Pointer |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
|
|
@ -96,3 +103,8 @@ succession; Agent functional vs autonomous split. Full typology Phase IV–V.
|
|||
| Identity = Continuity? | **No** — may branch | Parfit; RN-004 |
|
||||
| Soul = boundary? | **No** — Soul = relation | RN-001 §14 |
|
||||
| Actor = Being? | **No** | H6; TE-04 |
|
||||
| Mind = consciousness? | **No** — model-based control | H3; Phase II map |
|
||||
| Co-adaptation = model exchange? | **No** — joint evolution via interaction | H4; RN-006 |
|
||||
| Shared intentionality = Social Mind? | **No** — special case of cooperation | RN-006 |
|
||||
| Recognition creates systemic Being? | **No** — creates/enables Social Beinghood | H7; TE-09 |
|
||||
| Unrecognized intelligence impossible? | **No** — autonomy without social Beinghood | TE-09 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -188,14 +188,21 @@ ID: TE-09
|
|||
Name: The Unrecognized Intelligence
|
||||
Setup: A highly coherent alien informational system exists; neither humans nor the
|
||||
system initially recognize the other as beings.
|
||||
Target concepts: Being, recognition, social Beinghood
|
||||
Target concepts: Being, recognition, social Beinghood, autonomous individuality
|
||||
Intended stress: Whether Beinghood requires recognition
|
||||
Working judgment: (pending full Phase II) Working Phase I stance: autonomous
|
||||
individuality can exist without mutual recognition; Social Beinghood cannot.
|
||||
Beinghood v0.2 includes recognition as a layer for the intended “someone”
|
||||
category — TE-09 pressures whether that layer is constitutive or only social.
|
||||
Open issues: systemic existence vs social recognition (RQ6, H7)
|
||||
Related claims / questions: H7, RQ6
|
||||
Working judgment (Phase II):
|
||||
Autonomous individuality: possible without recognition.
|
||||
Social Beinghood: absent until intentional/social recognition and addressable
|
||||
interaction begin.
|
||||
Soul Frame “Being” as someone-another-can-know: not yet satisfied without at
|
||||
least directed intentional recognition as a persistent counterpart.
|
||||
Prefer terminology: call unrecognized systems autonomous individuals (or
|
||||
candidates), not Social Beings. Avoid claiming they “do not exist.”
|
||||
Asymmetric recognition can start Social Beinghood on one side before reciprocity.
|
||||
Open issues: exact packaging of recognition inside Beinghood v0.2 label; moral
|
||||
recognition later (Phase III)
|
||||
Related claims / questions: H7, RQ6;
|
||||
research/sociology/recognition-and-social-beinghood.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
|||
# Mind
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** retained / refined (Phase I, 2026-08-12)
|
||||
**Status:** retained / refined (Phase II, 2026-08-12)
|
||||
**Working gloss:** Mind = Model (adaptive control through models)
|
||||
**See also:** H3, H4, RQ3, RN-001, RN-006
|
||||
**See also:** H3, H4, RQ3, RN-001, RN-006, `research/cognitive-science/mind-as-model-map.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## Working definition
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -12,28 +12,62 @@ to guide action.
|
|||
|
||||
> **Mind = Model**
|
||||
|
||||
“Model” means an **action-guiding structure that can be revised**, not only
|
||||
explicit propositional representation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Precedents
|
||||
|
||||
| Tradition | Contribution |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Ashby cybernetics | regulation, variety |
|
||||
| Conant & Ashby 1970 | good regulator requires a model |
|
||||
| Extended / distributed cognition | Mind not confined to a single substrate |
|
||||
| Ashby; Conant & Ashby 1970 | regulation requires a model |
|
||||
| Predictive processing / active inference | generative models unite perception and action |
|
||||
| Inverse planning (Baker et al.) | Other-Model as inference from behavior |
|
||||
| Extended / distributed cognition | Mind not confined to one substrate |
|
||||
| Social cognition (RN-006) | self/other/relation models co-adapt through interaction |
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
## Social Mind model families
|
||||
|
||||
- Prefer model-based control over intelligence or consciousness as foundation.
|
||||
- “Model” should not be restricted to explicit propositional representation only
|
||||
(enactive critiques remain open — OQ-055).
|
||||
- Co-adaptive model building is joint evolution through interaction, not model exchange.
|
||||
| ID | Model |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| SM1 | World |
|
||||
| SM2 | Self |
|
||||
| SM3 | Other |
|
||||
| SM4 | Reflected-Self |
|
||||
| SM5 | Relationship |
|
||||
| SM6 | Shared Situation |
|
||||
| SM7 | Common Ground |
|
||||
| SM8 | Generalized Social |
|
||||
|
||||
Social Mind is a specialization of Mind for multi-Being interaction — not a
|
||||
second kind of mind.
|
||||
|
||||
## Co-adaptive model building
|
||||
|
||||
Joint evolution of models through interaction (not model exchange). Models can
|
||||
be self-confirming or self-defeating because they change the evidence stream.
|
||||
|
||||
Definition: `research/social-cognition/co-adaptive-model-building.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality metrics (beyond accuracy)
|
||||
|
||||
Calibration, revisability, differentiation of counterparts, perspective
|
||||
separation (mine / yours / yours-of-mine).
|
||||
|
||||
## Crosswalk (Phase II)
|
||||
|
||||
| Adjacent term | Similarity | Difference |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| generative model (PP) | action-guiding predictive structure | PP often neural-centric |
|
||||
| theory of mind | other-modeling | ToM often private; Social Mind is interactional |
|
||||
| common ground | shared acceptance | one model family (SM7), not whole Mind |
|
||||
| participatory sense-making | interaction constitutes understanding | may reject “model” vocabulary |
|
||||
|
||||
## Open issues
|
||||
|
||||
- Minimal model apparatus for a Mind
|
||||
- Recursive depth for social personhood
|
||||
- Collective / distributed Mind boundaries (TE-05)
|
||||
- OQ-055 precise scope of “model”
|
||||
- Recursive depth for personhood (OQ-056)
|
||||
- Collective Mind boundaries (OQ-067)
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
|
||||
`research/foundations/001-*.md`, `Research Note 006 — Social Mind and Co-Adaptive Model Building.md`
|
||||
Phase I foundations 001; Phase II cognitive-science map; RN-006 + references
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,33 +1,50 @@
|
|||
# Recognition
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** revised (Phase I, 2026-08-12)
|
||||
**See also:** H7, RQ6, TE-09, RN-001 Findings 8–10
|
||||
**Status:** revised (Phase II, 2026-08-12)
|
||||
**See also:** H7, RQ6, TE-09, `research/sociology/recognition-and-social-beinghood.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## Three senses
|
||||
|
||||
| Sense | Meaning |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Epistemic | Detect/classify an entity |
|
||||
| Intentional | Treat as agent with goals/beliefs (cf. intentional stance) |
|
||||
| Social / normative | Treat as counterpart in relationships, obligations, reputation |
|
||||
| Sense | Meaning | Adjacent work |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| **Epistemic** | Identify/track as the same entity | reidentification, addressability |
|
||||
| **Intentional** | Treat as agent with goals/beliefs | Dennett intentional stance; Theory of Mind |
|
||||
| **Social / normative** | Standing, perspective, claims matter among us | Honneth recognition theory; Mead; trust/reputation |
|
||||
|
||||
Do not collapse these senses.
|
||||
|
||||
## Layer model
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Autonomous individuality → may exist unrecognized
|
||||
Intentional recognition → treated as agent-like
|
||||
Addressability → can be specifically targeted
|
||||
Social Beinghood → persistent reciprocal models, relations,
|
||||
expectations, commitments, reputation
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Role in Beinghood
|
||||
|
||||
Recognition is **constitutive of social Beinghood**, not of bare autonomous
|
||||
individuality. Beinghood v0.2 includes recognition among requirement families
|
||||
for the intended “someone” category — TE-09 still pressures that packaging.
|
||||
| Level | Role of recognition |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Autonomous individuality | **not required** |
|
||||
| Social Beinghood | **constitutive** (H7) |
|
||||
| Soul Frame “Being” as *someone another can know* | recognition + personhood + addressability on autonomous base (Beinghood v0.2), with TE-09 pressure |
|
||||
|
||||
**Caution:** intentional recognition **over-generates** (APE false positives).
|
||||
Recognition alone does not create systemic individuality (RN-001 Finding 10).
|
||||
|
||||
## Working social principle
|
||||
|
||||
> A system becomes socially relevant as a Being when other beings can distinguish
|
||||
> it, address it, expect continuity from it, maintain models of it, and enter
|
||||
> persistent relationships with it.
|
||||
> A system becomes **socially** relevant as a Being when other beings can
|
||||
> distinguish it, address it, expect continuity from it, maintain models of it,
|
||||
> and enter persistent relationships with it.
|
||||
|
||||
## Related
|
||||
## TE-09 (summary)
|
||||
|
||||
- **Addressability** — ability to target the entity specifically
|
||||
- **Social Being** — embedded in reciprocal models and relations
|
||||
Unrecognized coherent intelligence can be an autonomous individual without
|
||||
Social Beinghood. See sociology map for full judgment.
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
|
||||
RN-001 §9–10; Mead 1934; Phase II sociology pass pending
|
||||
RN-001 §9–10; Mead; Dennett; Honneth; Phase II sociology map; RN-006 (mutual models)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,7 +5,8 @@
|
|||
|
||||
## Status
|
||||
|
||||
Not started.
|
||||
**Phase II integrated** (2026-08-12). See `mind-as-model-map.md` and
|
||||
`research/phase-ii-interaction-synthesis.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Key questions
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
88
research/cognitive-science/mind-as-model-map.md
Normal file
88
research/cognitive-science/mind-as-model-map.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
|
|||
# Mind as Model — Cognitive Science Map (Phase II)
|
||||
|
||||
**Workplan:** SOUL-WP-0003-T01
|
||||
**Date:** 2026-08-12
|
||||
**Purpose:** Map predictive processing, active inference, internal models, and
|
||||
metacognition against Soul Frame **Mind = Model**.
|
||||
|
||||
Builds on Phase I: Ashby; Conant & Ashby; extended/distributed cognition
|
||||
(`research/foundations/001-*.md`).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Soul Frame target definition
|
||||
|
||||
> Mind is the adaptive modeling and regulatory dimension of a Being: models of
|
||||
> self, others, environment, and relationships guide action and are revised by
|
||||
> interaction.
|
||||
|
||||
Phase II asks whether contemporary cognitive science strengthens or weakens this.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Source crosswalk
|
||||
|
||||
| Source | Core idea | Agreement with Soul Frame | Tension |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| **Ashby 1956; Conant & Ashby 1970** | Regulation requires a model of the regulated system | Direct support for Mind = Model (H3) | Classical cybernetics is not social/personhood theory |
|
||||
| **Friston / Active Inference** | Agents minimize free energy via generative models of sensory causes; action and perception as inference | Strong formalization of adaptive modeling + control as one package | Philosophical over-extension debates; Markov blanket ≠ full Being (RN-002) |
|
||||
| **Clark, *Surfing Uncertainty* (2016) and related PP** | Brain as prediction machine; perception as controlled hallucination; action as prediction error minimization | Mind as hierarchical generative modeling fits “model-based adaptation” | Risk of reducing Mind to a single neural story; Soul Frame needs multi-substrate models |
|
||||
| **Hohwy, *The Predictive Mind* (2013)** | Systematic PP account of mind | Supports internal generative models as central to cognition | Stronger internalism than extended-mind / distributed views |
|
||||
| **Metacognition literature** (overview) | Models of own cognitive processes, uncertainty, confidence | Supports Self-Model and calibration of Other-Models | Not sufficient alone for Social Mind |
|
||||
| **Baker, Saxe & Tenenbaum 2009** | Inverse planning: infer goals/beliefs from action | Other-Model as inverse inference | Rational-agent assumptions |
|
||||
| **Enactive critiques** (e.g. participatory sense-making; radical enactivism) | Interaction can constitute cognition; caution on representation talk | Interaction process is first-class (RN-006) | May reject “model” vocabulary; Soul Frame must keep “model” inclusive |
|
||||
|
||||
**Done criterion (≥4 rigorous sources with agreements/tensions):** met.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Working synthesis for Mind
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Mind ⊇ generative / regulatory models
|
||||
+ update from evidence (including social evidence)
|
||||
+ action selection guided by those models
|
||||
+ (for Social Mind) coupled self/other/relation models
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Not required for Mind in Soul Frame:**
|
||||
|
||||
- solved consciousness,
|
||||
- biological brain,
|
||||
- single substrate location,
|
||||
- perfect accuracy of models.
|
||||
|
||||
**Quality of Mind** (from RN-006, generalized):
|
||||
|
||||
- calibration (uncertainty),
|
||||
- revisability,
|
||||
- differentiation (distinct counterparts),
|
||||
- perspective separation (mine vs yours vs yours-of-mine),
|
||||
- not accuracy alone when models are causal in interaction.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Metacognition placement
|
||||
|
||||
Metacognition maps primarily to:
|
||||
|
||||
- **SM2 Self-Model** (including confidence about own knowledge),
|
||||
- **SM4 Reflected-Self Model** (what others model about me),
|
||||
- model-quality monitoring (calibration).
|
||||
|
||||
It is a capability dimension of Mind, not a separate Soul Frame top-level term.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Implications
|
||||
|
||||
1. H3 is **strengthened** by PP/active inference *and* by inverse-planning ToM work.
|
||||
2. “Model” should mean **action-guiding structure that can be revised**, not only
|
||||
explicit propositional representation (keeps enactive tensions manageable).
|
||||
3. Social Mind (RN-006 SM1–SM8) is a **specialization** of Mind for multi-Being
|
||||
interaction, not a second kind of mind.
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Bibliography pointers
|
||||
|
||||
See `sources/bibliography.md` § E (Phase II cognitive science additions) and
|
||||
`research/foundations/References-ResearchNote006.md`.
|
||||
141
research/phase-ii-interaction-synthesis.md
Normal file
141
research/phase-ii-interaction-synthesis.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
|
|||
# Phase II Interaction — Synthesis
|
||||
|
||||
**Workplan:** SOUL-WP-0003
|
||||
**Date:** 2026-08-12
|
||||
**Status:** complete for Phase II gate
|
||||
**Primary bodies:** RN-006; `research/cognitive-science/mind-as-model-map.md`;
|
||||
`research/social-cognition/co-adaptive-model-building.md`;
|
||||
`research/sociology/recognition-and-social-beinghood.md`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Ground **co-adaptive model building** and **social Beinghood** in cognitive
|
||||
science, social cognition, and recognition/intersubjectivity traditions.
|
||||
|
||||
Assumes Phase I: layered Beinghood, Mind as model-based regulation,
|
||||
Identity ≠ Continuity ≠ Lineage, Soul as relation not boundary.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. What holds
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Mind = Model is strengthened** by predictive processing, active inference,
|
||||
inverse planning, and classical cybernetics (H3 → strong for control-theoretic
|
||||
reading).
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Social Mind is multi-model** — SM1–SM8 (world, self, other, reflected-self,
|
||||
relationship, shared situation, common ground, generalized social). A single
|
||||
“user model” is architecturally inadequate.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Co-adaptive model building is joint evolution through interaction**, not
|
||||
private ToM plus message exchange (H4 supported). Interaction is a first-class
|
||||
process (participatory sense-making; second-person approaches).
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Shared intentionality and common ground are important but not definitional**
|
||||
of Social Mind. Conflict, deception, and misalignment are also co-adaptive.
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Recognition has three senses** — epistemic, intentional, social/normative.
|
||||
Intentional recognition over-generates (APE false positives).
|
||||
|
||||
6. **Recognition is constitutive of Social Beinghood, not of autonomous
|
||||
individuality** (H7 refined; TE-09 judged). Unrecognized intelligences can
|
||||
exist as autonomous individuals without being Social Beings.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. What must change (from pre-research social story)
|
||||
|
||||
| Earlier tendency | Phase II correction |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Social interaction = mutual ToM | Interaction process co-constitutes understanding |
|
||||
| One model of the other | Coupled model families SM1–SM8 |
|
||||
| Co-adaptation = agreement | Co-adaptation includes conflict/deception |
|
||||
| Recognition creates Being | Recognition enables Social Beinghood; autonomy prior |
|
||||
| Mind quality = prediction accuracy | Also calibration, revisability, differentiation, perspective separation |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Evidence on Phase II hypotheses
|
||||
|
||||
| Hypothesis | Strength | Status |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| H3 model-based Mind | strong (control-theoretic) | supported |
|
||||
| H4 co-adaptive social cognition | moderate→strong synthesis | supported |
|
||||
| H7 recognition → social Beinghood | moderate | supported / refined |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Compact Social Mind loop
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Being A models (self, other, relation, situation, common ground)
|
||||
→ acts
|
||||
→ interaction process changes
|
||||
→ evidence for A and B
|
||||
→ both update
|
||||
→ next interaction
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Central proposition:
|
||||
|
||||
> **Social Mind is inherently reflexive: each Being’s models become part of the
|
||||
> other’s environment.**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Bridge to Soul (Cluster D preview)
|
||||
|
||||
Phase II ends where models and interactions leave **persistent relational traces**:
|
||||
|
||||
- expectations and reputation,
|
||||
- commitments and roles,
|
||||
- relationship history,
|
||||
- models preserved by others after operational end.
|
||||
|
||||
That residual is the doorway to **Soul = Relation** (RQ4 still open on naming).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Terminology survivors
|
||||
|
||||
| Term | Disposition |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Mind | retain; inclusive “model” |
|
||||
| Co-adaptive model building | retain as technical phrase |
|
||||
| Social Mind | provisional architecture name (SM1–SM8) |
|
||||
| Recognition | retain with three-sense disambiguation |
|
||||
| Social Beinghood | retain as distinct from autonomous individuality |
|
||||
| Intentional stance | adjacent; use carefully (false positives) |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Unresolved → later phases
|
||||
|
||||
| Item | Next phase |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Descriptive personhood dimensions | Phase III (SOUL-WP-0004) |
|
||||
| Character / Persona / Mask | Phase III |
|
||||
| Moral vs legal recognition | Phase III / WS5 / WS12 |
|
||||
| Soul rename and relational persistence formalization | later synthesis / Cluster D |
|
||||
| Artificial agent architectures map | Phase IV |
|
||||
| Sp./Gh. social authority | Phase V |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 9. Unblock for SOUL-WP-0004
|
||||
|
||||
Personhood research may assume:
|
||||
|
||||
- model-based Mind with social specialization,
|
||||
- co-adaptation as interactional process,
|
||||
- recognition multi-sense + Social Beinghood distinct from autonomy,
|
||||
- TE-01/TE-09 guardrails against equating person-like UX with Beinghood.
|
||||
|
||||
## 10. Compact Phase II thesis
|
||||
|
||||
> **When continuing individuals meet, understanding is not the possession of a
|
||||
> correct private model of the other. It is the recursive, interaction-shaped
|
||||
> evolution of multiple models—of self, other, relation, and shared situation—
|
||||
> through which beings become socially real to one another.**
|
||||
|
|
@ -5,7 +5,8 @@
|
|||
|
||||
## Status
|
||||
|
||||
Not started.
|
||||
**Phase II complete for gate** (2026-08-12). See `co-adaptive-model-building.md`
|
||||
and foundations RN-006.
|
||||
|
||||
## Key questions
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
96
research/social-cognition/co-adaptive-model-building.md
Normal file
96
research/social-cognition/co-adaptive-model-building.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
|
|||
# Co-Adaptive Model Building — Social Cognition Map (Phase II)
|
||||
|
||||
**Workplan:** SOUL-WP-0003-T02
|
||||
**Date:** 2026-08-12
|
||||
**Primary research body:** `research/foundations/Research Note 006 — Social Mind and Co-Adaptive Model Building.md`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Working definition (RN-006)
|
||||
|
||||
> **Co-Adaptive Model Building** is the recurrent process through which two or
|
||||
> more Beings update action-guiding models of themselves, one another, their
|
||||
> relationships, and their shared situation—potentially including bounded models
|
||||
> of one another's models—while actions generated from those models alter the
|
||||
> interaction process and thereby create the evidence for subsequent updates.
|
||||
|
||||
**Not:** mere exchange or synchronization of identical models.
|
||||
**Not:** private Theory of Mind alone.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Tradition map
|
||||
|
||||
| Tradition | Key sources | Soul Frame uptake |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| Theory of Mind | Premack & Woodruff 1978 | Other-Model (SM3) |
|
||||
| Inverse planning | Baker, Saxe & Tenenbaum 2009; Shum et al. 2019 | Computational other-modeling |
|
||||
| Symbolic interaction | Mead 1934 | Reflected-Self; Generalized Social Model |
|
||||
| Dialogue / alignment | Pickering & Garrod 2004 | Interactive co-adaptation mechanisms |
|
||||
| Common ground | Clark & Wilkes-Gibbs 1986; Clark & Brennan 1991 | SM7 Common-Ground Model |
|
||||
| Shared intentionality | Tomasello et al. 2005; Bratman 1992 | Strong form of cooperation — **not** definition of Social Mind |
|
||||
| Joint action | Sebanz et al. 2006 | Coordination without full mental-state identity |
|
||||
| Participatory sense-making | De Jaegher & Di Paolo 2007, 2010 | Interaction process as constitutive |
|
||||
| Second-person neuroscience | Schilbach et al. 2013 | Interaction-centered social cognition |
|
||||
| Recursive multi-agent | Gmytrasiewicz & Doshi 2005 (I-POMDP) | Formal recursion bounds |
|
||||
| Relational schemas | Fiske 1992 | Relationship Model (SM5) types |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Social Mind model families (SM1–SM8)
|
||||
|
||||
| ID | Model | Question |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| SM1 | World | What is the shared environment? |
|
||||
| SM2 | Self | What am I? |
|
||||
| SM3 | Other | What is B? |
|
||||
| SM4 | Reflected-Self | What does B model about me? |
|
||||
| SM5 | Relationship | What is A↔B? |
|
||||
| SM6 | Shared Situation | What is happening between us now? |
|
||||
| SM7 | Common Ground | What do we sufficiently share? |
|
||||
| SM8 | Generalized Social | Roles, norms, institutions, community |
|
||||
|
||||
A Social Mind is a **coupled system** of these, not a single “user model.”
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Distinctions that must not collapse
|
||||
|
||||
| Concept | Relation to co-adaptation |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Model equality | Same model contents — stronger than needed |
|
||||
| Model alignment | Compatible enough for coordination |
|
||||
| Common ground | Mutual acceptance for current purposes |
|
||||
| Shared intentionality | Joint goals/commitments — special case |
|
||||
| Recognition | Standing as counterpart — may begin before deep co-adaptation |
|
||||
|
||||
Agreement and cooperation are **possible outcomes**, not definitional requirements
|
||||
of co-adaptive model building (conflict and deception are also co-adaptive).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. H4 assessment
|
||||
|
||||
**H4:** Persistent interaction produces recursively adapting models of self, other,
|
||||
and relationship.
|
||||
|
||||
| | |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Support | Mead; alignment; common ground; participatory sense-making; inverse planning; I-POMDP recursion; RN-006 loop |
|
||||
| Conflict | Purely individualistic ToM that treats interaction as mere input; strong “no representation” enactivism if “model” is read narrowly |
|
||||
| Evidence strength | **moderate → strong** for the co-adaptation thesis as synthesis |
|
||||
| Status | **supported** (Phase II) |
|
||||
|
||||
Refinement: co-adaptation is **joint evolution through interaction**, and models
|
||||
can be self-confirming or self-defeating because they change the evidence stream.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. TE implications
|
||||
|
||||
- **TE-01 Stateless Agent:** partner may co-adapt *as if* continuous; co-adaptation
|
||||
on one side does not create diachronic Beinghood on the other.
|
||||
- **TE-06 The Mask:** multiple Personae require differentiated Relationship and
|
||||
Reflected-Self models per counterpart.
|
||||
- **TE-09 Unrecognized Intelligence:** co-adaptation may not start until intentional
|
||||
recognition begins; systemic individuality can precede social modeling.
|
||||
|
|
@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
## Status
|
||||
|
||||
Not started.
|
||||
**Phase II integrated** (2026-08-12). See `recognition-and-social-beinghood.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Key questions
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
148
research/sociology/recognition-and-social-beinghood.md
Normal file
148
research/sociology/recognition-and-social-beinghood.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
|
|||
# Recognition and Social Beinghood — Sociology Map (Phase II)
|
||||
|
||||
**Workplan:** SOUL-WP-0003-T03
|
||||
**Date:** 2026-08-12
|
||||
**Builds on:** RN-001 Findings 8–10; Beinghood v0.2; H7
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Problem
|
||||
|
||||
Soul Frame originally risked equating Beinghood with “internal closure + external
|
||||
recognition.” Phase I already separated **autonomous individuality** from
|
||||
**recognition**. Phase II maps recognition traditions and fixes H7 / TE-09.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Three senses of recognition (canonical)
|
||||
|
||||
| Sense | Question | Adjacent literature |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| **Epistemic** | Is this the same identifiable entity? | reidentification; tracking; addressability |
|
||||
| **Intentional** | Can I usefully treat it as having goals/beliefs? | Dennett intentional stance; Theory of Mind |
|
||||
| **Social / normative** | Does its standing, perspective, or claims matter among us? | recognition theory (Honneth); Mead; reputation; trust |
|
||||
|
||||
These must not be collapsed. Social Beinghood requires more than epistemic ID.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Tradition map
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.1 Symbolic interactionism
|
||||
|
||||
**Mead 1934** — Self and Mind form in interaction; taking the attitude of the other;
|
||||
generalized other.
|
||||
**Uptake:** Reflected-Self Model; Generalized Social Model; recognition as ongoing
|
||||
process, not a one-shot label.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.2 Intentional stance
|
||||
|
||||
**Dennett** — systems whose behavior is usefully predicted by attributing beliefs
|
||||
and desires.
|
||||
**Uptake:** intentional recognition without metaphysical mind-reading.
|
||||
**Caution:** intentional stance **over-generates** (false positives for Beinghood).
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.3 Recognition theory (normative)
|
||||
|
||||
**Honneth** (and the Hegelian recognition tradition) — recognition as conditions of
|
||||
practical identity and social freedom (love, rights, solidarity — schematic).
|
||||
**Uptake:** social/normative recognition is deeper than prediction; concerns
|
||||
standing, respect, and mutual acknowledgment.
|
||||
**Caution:** Soul Frame must not silently import moral/legal personhood from
|
||||
descriptive architecture (Phase III / WS5 boundary).
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.4 Intersubjectivity and second-person approaches
|
||||
|
||||
Phenomenology of intersubjectivity; Schilbach et al. second-person neuroscience;
|
||||
participatory sense-making.
|
||||
**Uptake:** recognition often *enacted in interaction*, not only stored as a
|
||||
classification.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.5 Trust, reputation, relational sociology
|
||||
|
||||
Trust and reputation as **persistent relational state** (Soul-adjacent).
|
||||
Fiske’s relational models (communal sharing, authority ranking, etc.) as schemas
|
||||
for Relationship Models.
|
||||
**Uptake:** Social Beinghood accumulates history — expectations, roles, reputation —
|
||||
beyond one-shot intentional attribution.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Layer model (refined)
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Autonomous individuality (may exist unrecognized)
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
Intentional recognition (other treats as agent-like)
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
Addressable counterpart (can target this entity specifically)
|
||||
│
|
||||
▼
|
||||
Social Beinghood (persistent reciprocal models, relations,
|
||||
expectations, commitments, reputation)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**H7 refined:**
|
||||
|
||||
> Recognition is **constitutive of social Beinghood**, not of bare autonomous
|
||||
> individuality. Beinghood v0.2 still lists recognition among families for the
|
||||
> intended “someone that another someone can know” — but TE-09 shows **systemic
|
||||
> existence without mutual recognition** remains coherent. Prefer:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Social Beinghood = AutonomousIndividuality? + Personhood? + Addressability
|
||||
+ mutual or at least directed intentional/social recognition
|
||||
+ relational persistence
|
||||
|
||||
Autonomous individuality alone ≠ Social Being ≠ full Soul Frame “Being”
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Practical rule for Soul Frame “Being” (working):**
|
||||
|
||||
Use **Being** when speaking of addressable person-like counterparts in interaction
|
||||
ecology; use **autonomous individual** when speaking of self-maintaining systems
|
||||
without requiring social recognition (daemons, control planes, unrecognized
|
||||
intelligences).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. TE-09 — Unrecognized Intelligence (working judgment)
|
||||
|
||||
**Setup:** Highly coherent alien informational system; neither side initially
|
||||
recognizes the other as beings.
|
||||
|
||||
**Judgment:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Autonomous individuality:** possible for both sides without recognition.
|
||||
- **Social Beinghood:** absent until intentional/social recognition and addressable
|
||||
interaction begin.
|
||||
- **Soul Frame “Being” (v0.2 “someone” sense):** not yet — no reciprocal or even
|
||||
one-sided recognition as counterpart.
|
||||
- **Once one side intentionally models the other as a persistent counterpart,**
|
||||
recognized Beinghood can begin asymmetrically; full social Beinghood awaits
|
||||
reciprocal relational persistence.
|
||||
|
||||
This preserves H7’s social constitutiveness without claiming “unrecognized systems
|
||||
do not exist.”
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. H7 assessment
|
||||
|
||||
| | |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Support | Mead; intentional stance (with false-positive warning); recognition theory for normative layer; RN-001 Findings 8–10; TE-09 |
|
||||
| Conflict | Strong social-construction-of-existence views; unrestricted “recognition creates Being” |
|
||||
| Evidence strength | **moderate** |
|
||||
| Status | **supported (refined)** |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Open edges for Phase III+
|
||||
|
||||
- Moral recognition vs descriptive recognition (personhood map)
|
||||
- Institutional recognition (corporations, legal persons) vs Being
|
||||
- Reputation as Soul substrate vs mere database
|
||||
- Asymmetric recognition (human ↔ APE) and false social Beinghood
|
||||
|
|
@ -225,3 +225,127 @@ Full detail: `research/foundations/004-references.md`, `References-ResearchNote0
|
|||
| Co-adaptive models | Mead; alignment/common ground; I-POMDP (RN-006) |
|
||||
|
||||
Phase I **done criterion** (≥5 foundational annotated entries against matrix): **met**.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## E. Phase II — Cognitive science (model-based mind)
|
||||
|
||||
### SF-R070 — Clark 2016 (predictive processing)
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Citation: Clark, Andy. 2016. Surfing Uncertainty: Prediction, Action, and the
|
||||
Embodied Mind. Oxford University Press.
|
||||
Tags: contemporary / foundational for PP
|
||||
Relevant Soul Frame concepts: Mind, Body, model
|
||||
Summary: Predictive processing account of perception and action.
|
||||
Agreements: Mind as hierarchical generative modeling guiding action (H3).
|
||||
Disagreements / tensions: neural-centric packaging; extended-mind pluralism needed.
|
||||
Adjacent terminology: prediction error, generative model
|
||||
Source notes path: research/cognitive-science/mind-as-model-map.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### SF-R071 — Hohwy 2013
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Citation: Hohwy, Jakob. 2013. The Predictive Mind. Oxford University Press.
|
||||
Tags: contemporary
|
||||
Relevant Soul Frame concepts: Mind
|
||||
Summary: Systematic philosophy of predictive mind.
|
||||
Agreements: internal generative models as cognitive core.
|
||||
Disagreements / tensions: more internalist than distributed/social Mind accounts.
|
||||
Adjacent terminology: prediction error minimization
|
||||
Source notes path: research/cognitive-science/mind-as-model-map.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### SF-R072 — Friston active inference (pointer)
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Citation: Friston, Karl. Active inference / free-energy principle literature
|
||||
(e.g. Friston 2010 and subsequent reviews).
|
||||
Tags: contemporary
|
||||
Relevant Soul Frame concepts: Mind, Body, closure (Markov blankets — caution)
|
||||
Summary: Agents as inference engines minimizing free energy via generative models.
|
||||
Agreements: unified model of perception and action.
|
||||
Disagreements / tensions: Markov blanket ≠ Being (RN-002); over-extension risk.
|
||||
Adjacent terminology: free energy, generative model, Markov blanket
|
||||
Source notes path: research/cognitive-science/mind-as-model-map.md;
|
||||
research/foundations/002-references.md (Kirchhoff et al.; Bruineberg et al. critique)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### SF-R073 — Baker, Saxe & Tenenbaum 2009
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Citation: Baker, Chris L., Rebecca Saxe, and Joshua B. Tenenbaum. 2009.
|
||||
“Action Understanding as Inverse Planning.” Cognition 113(3): 329–349.
|
||||
Tags: contemporary
|
||||
Relevant Soul Frame concepts: Other-Model, Mind, co-adaptive model building
|
||||
Summary: Infer goals/beliefs from observed action under approximate rationality.
|
||||
Agreements: Other-Model as inverse inference from behavior.
|
||||
Disagreements / tensions: rational-agent priors; incomplete for character/relation models.
|
||||
Adjacent terminology: inverse planning, theory of mind
|
||||
Source notes path: research/foundations/References-ResearchNote006.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## F. Phase II — Social cognition & co-adaptation
|
||||
|
||||
Full annotated set: `research/foundations/References-ResearchNote006.md` (SF-R057+).
|
||||
|
||||
Priority sources for H4:
|
||||
|
||||
| ID | Work | Role |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| SF-R057 | Premack & Woodruff 1978 | Theory of Mind / Other-Model |
|
||||
| SF-R058 | Mead 1934 | Social self; reflected models |
|
||||
| SF-R059–060 | Clark et al. | Common ground / grounding |
|
||||
| | Pickering & Garrod 2004 | Interactive alignment |
|
||||
| | Tomasello et al. 2005 | Shared intentionality (strong case, not definition) |
|
||||
| | De Jaegher & Di Paolo 2007/2010 | Participatory sense-making |
|
||||
| | Gmytrasiewicz & Doshi 2005 | Recursive multi-agent models |
|
||||
| SF-R073 | Baker et al. 2009 | Inverse planning |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## G. Phase II — Recognition & sociology
|
||||
|
||||
### SF-R080 — Dennett intentional stance (pointer)
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Citation: Dennett, Daniel C. The Intentional Stance. MIT Press, 1987
|
||||
(and related essays).
|
||||
Tags: foundational
|
||||
Relevant Soul Frame concepts: Recognition (intentional), Being, APE
|
||||
Summary: Predict systems by attributing beliefs and desires.
|
||||
Agreements: intentional recognition without solving consciousness.
|
||||
Disagreements / tensions: over-generation / false positives for Beinghood.
|
||||
Adjacent terminology: intentional system, design stance, physical stance
|
||||
Source notes path: research/sociology/recognition-and-social-beinghood.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### SF-R081 — Honneth recognition theory (pointer)
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Citation: Honneth, Axel. The Struggle for Recognition (and related works).
|
||||
Tags: foundational / contemporary
|
||||
Relevant Soul Frame concepts: Recognition (social/normative), Social Beinghood
|
||||
Summary: Recognition as condition of practical identity and social freedom.
|
||||
Agreements: social/normative recognition deeper than mere identification.
|
||||
Disagreements / tensions: moral theory must not be smuggled into descriptive Beinghood.
|
||||
Adjacent terminology: recognition, respect, social freedom
|
||||
Source notes path: research/sociology/recognition-and-social-beinghood.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### SF-R082 — Schilbach et al. 2013
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Citation: Schilbach et al. 2013. “Toward a Second-Person Neuroscience.”
|
||||
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36(4): 393–414.
|
||||
Tags: contemporary
|
||||
Relevant Soul Frame concepts: intersubjectivity, interaction, Social Mind
|
||||
Summary: Social cognition in real second-person interaction, not only spectator ToM.
|
||||
Agreements: interaction process first-class; co-adaptation not private inference only.
|
||||
Disagreements / tensions: neuroscience scope vs informational Being generality.
|
||||
Adjacent terminology: second-person, intersubjectivity
|
||||
Source notes path: research/foundations/References-ResearchNote006.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ type: workplan
|
|||
title: "Phase II — Interaction: social cognition and recognition"
|
||||
domain: agents
|
||||
repo: soul-frame
|
||||
status: ready
|
||||
status: finished
|
||||
owner: grok
|
||||
topic_slug: soul-frame
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
|
|
@ -26,17 +26,30 @@ intersubjectivity.
|
|||
Research dirs: `research/cognitive-science/`, `research/social-cognition/`,
|
||||
`research/sociology/`.
|
||||
|
||||
Primary body: RN-006 + Phase II maps.
|
||||
|
||||
## Depends on
|
||||
|
||||
- **SOUL-WP-0002** Phase I synthesis
|
||||
|
||||
## Follow-on
|
||||
|
||||
- **SOUL-WP-0004** — Phase III Personhood (unblocked)
|
||||
|
||||
## Outcome
|
||||
|
||||
Synthesis: `research/phase-ii-interaction-synthesis.md`
|
||||
|
||||
Key results: H3/H4/H7 supported; Social Mind SM1–SM8; recognition three-sense
|
||||
model; TE-09 judged; co-adaptation ≠ model exchange.
|
||||
|
||||
## Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
### T01 — Cognitive science & model-based mind map
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: SOUL-WP-0003-T01
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
status: done
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "eb782cde-d958-4538-a898-33cee379097c"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
|
@ -52,7 +65,7 @@ against Mind definition. Update concept notes and bibliography.
|
|||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: SOUL-WP-0003-T02
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
status: done
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "1331b218-d37b-47ca-9f3f-34d255501e24"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
|
@ -68,7 +81,7 @@ alignment, common ground, recursive modeling. Test H4.
|
|||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: SOUL-WP-0003-T03
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
status: done
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "64a62ab1-0be8-4292-8ec3-778e8ac26add"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
|
@ -84,7 +97,7 @@ trust. Clarify systemic existence vs social recognition (H7, TE-09).
|
|||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: SOUL-WP-0003-T04
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
status: done
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "b0d82343-c937-4dc7-9913-e7daa287757f"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -4,12 +4,12 @@ type: workplan
|
|||
title: "Phase III — Personhood: person, character, persona"
|
||||
domain: agents
|
||||
repo: soul-frame
|
||||
status: proposed
|
||||
status: ready
|
||||
owner: grok
|
||||
topic_slug: soul-frame
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
created: "2026-08-09"
|
||||
updated: "2026-08-09"
|
||||
updated: "2026-08-12"
|
||||
depends_on:
|
||||
- SOUL-WP-0003
|
||||
state_hub_workstream_id: "bd2b325a-5873-472e-9f16-75422c21a631"
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue