Complete Phase II interaction (SOUL-WP-0003)

Map model-based mind, co-adaptive social cognition, and recognition/social
Beinghood into instruments and workstream notes. Support H3/H4/H7, judge TE-09,
write phase-ii-interaction-synthesis.md, finish SOUL-WP-0003, and mark
SOUL-WP-0004 ready.

Claims.md

@@ -64,17 +64,19 @@ Soul Frame concept: Mind
 Supporting literature:
   - Ashby 1956 (regulation)
   - Conant & Ashby 1970 (Good Regulator Theorem)
-  - Predictive processing / active inference traditions (pointer; Phase II/III)
-  - RN-001 Findings 4–6
+  - Clark 2016 Surfing Uncertainty; Hohwy 2013 Predictive Mind
+  - Friston active inference literature (with Markov-blanket cautions)
+  - Baker, Saxe & Tenenbaum 2009 (inverse planning)
+  - RN-001 Findings 4–6; research/cognitive-science/mind-as-model-map.md
 Contradicting literature:
   - Anti-representational / radical enactivist critiques of “model” talk
   - Consciousness-first theories of mind
-Adjacent terminology: regulator, model, predictive processing, enaction
-Evidence strength: moderate → approaching strong for control-theoretic reading;
-  mixed if “model” is read as explicit internal representation only
+Adjacent terminology: regulator, generative model, predictive processing, enaction
+Evidence strength: strong for control-theoretic / generative-model reading;
+  mixed if “model” is restricted to explicit propositional representation only
 Open questions: OQ-055 definition of model; embodied non-representational cases
-Required refinement: define “model” inclusively enough for regulation + social cognition
-Status: supported (Phase I)
+Required refinement: model = action-guiding revisable structure (inclusive)
+Status: supported (Phase II)
 ```
 
 ### H4 — Social cognition is co-adaptive
@@ -82,19 +84,20 @@ Status: supported (Phase I)
 ```text
 Claim: Persistent interaction between beings produces recursively adapting models
        of self, other, and relationship.
-Soul Frame concept: Co-adaptive model building, Mind
+Soul Frame concept: Co-adaptive model building, Mind, Social Mind (SM1–SM8)
 Supporting literature:
   - Mead 1934; Pickering & Garrod 2004; Clark & Brennan 1991; Tomasello et al. 2005
-  - De Jaegher & Di Paolo 2007; I-POMDP / recursive agent modeling
-  - RN-006 synthesis
+  - De Jaegher & Di Paolo 2007/2010; Schilbach et al. 2013
+  - Baker et al. 2009; Gmytrasiewicz & Doshi 2005 (I-POMDP)
+  - RN-006 full synthesis; research/social-cognition/co-adaptive-model-building.md
 Contradicting literature: purely individualistic Theory-of-Mind accounts that
-  underplay interaction dynamics
+  underplay interaction dynamics; narrow “no model” enactivism
 Adjacent terminology: theory of mind, interactive alignment, common ground,
-  participatory sense-making
-Evidence strength: moderate (Phase II will own full pass; Phase I notes support direction)
+  participatory sense-making, second-person cognition
+Evidence strength: moderate → strong (as synthesis; not a single-lab empirical law)
 Open questions: OQ-055–068 in RN-006
-Required refinement: co-adaptation ≠ model exchange
-Status: under review (promising; Phase II)
+Required refinement: co-adaptation ≠ model exchange; conflict/deception included
+Status: supported (Phase II)
 ```
 
 ### H5 — Soul can be operationalized relationally
@@ -150,14 +153,20 @@ Claim: Being recognized as a persistent counterpart changes the systemic role of
        autonomous individuality.
 Soul Frame concept: Recognition, Social Beinghood
 Supporting literature:
-  - RN-001 Findings 8–10 (three senses of recognition; recognition ≠ create Being)
-  - Mead; intentional stance literature (pointer)
-Contradicting literature: strong social-construction-only accounts of existence
-Adjacent terminology: recognition theory, intentional stance, intersubjectivity
-Evidence strength: moderate for distinction; Phase II sociology pass pending
-Open questions: RQ6; TE-09 Unrecognized Intelligence
-Required refinement: epistemic vs intentional vs social recognition
-Status: revised (Phase I clarification)
+  - RN-001 Findings 8–10 (three senses; recognition ≠ create systemic Being)
+  - Mead 1934; Dennett intentional stance; Honneth recognition theory
+  - Schilbach et al. 2013 (second-person interaction)
+  - research/sociology/recognition-and-social-beinghood.md; TE-09 judgment
+Contradicting literature: strong social-construction-only accounts of existence;
+  unrestricted “recognition creates Being”
+Adjacent terminology: recognition theory, intentional stance, intersubjectivity,
+  trust, reputation
+Evidence strength: moderate
+Open questions: RQ6 packaging of recognition inside Beinghood v0.2; moral vs
+  descriptive recognition (Phase III)
+Required refinement: epistemic vs intentional vs social recognition; false
+  positives from intentional stance
+Status: supported / refined (Phase II)
 ```
 
 ### H8 — Persona is a projection rather than an identity