coulomb/soul-frame
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Complete Phase II interaction (SOUL-WP-0003)

Browse source 
Map model-based mind, co-adaptive social cognition, and recognition/social
Beinghood into instruments and workstream notes. Support H3/H4/H7, judge TE-09,
write phase-ii-interaction-synthesis.md, finish SOUL-WP-0003, and mark
SOUL-WP-0004 ready.
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-08-12 01:21:49 +02:00
parent cb40f77e5a
commit 807d6b17f6
15 changed files with 772 additions and 81 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

30
OpenQuestions.md
View file

@ -29,15 +29,19 @@ for Beinghood established (daemon false positive).
## RQ3 — What constitutes a Mind?
**Phase I status:** model-based reading supported (H3); remaining:
**Phase II status:** model-based reading **supported** (H3); Social Mind SM1–SM8
architecture adopted provisionally. Remaining:
- Precise definition of “model” (OQ-055)
- Minimal apparatus; recursive social depth
- Relation to RN-006 model families SM1–SM8
- Precise definition of “model” (OQ-055) — inclusive working def in concepts/mind.md
- Minimal apparatus for non-social vs social Mind
- Recursive depth for personhood (OQ-056)
- When common ground becomes collective Mind (OQ-067)
## RQ4 — What constitutes a Soul?
**Phase I status:** revised definition (boundary removed); **not closed**.
**Phase I–II status:** revised definition (boundary removed); **not closed**.
Phase II ends by pointing to Cluster D: what persists from interactions beyond
immediate models (relational persistence = Soul’s domain).
- Rename vs retain “Soul”
- Packaging: relations vs consequences vs both
@ -55,10 +59,13 @@ for Beinghood established (daemon false positive).
## RQ6 — How does recognition create social beinghood?
**Phase I status:** recognition disambiguated; social vs systemic clarified.
**Phase II status:** **refined answer available** — recognition constitutive of
*social* Beinghood, not bare autonomous individuality; three senses fixed;
TE-09 judged. Remaining:
- TE-09: is recognition constitutive of Being or only Social Being?
- Minimal recognition conditions
- Exact label policy for Beinghood v0.2 vs “autonomous individual”
- Minimal intentional vs social recognition conditions
- Moral/legal recognition deferred to Phase III
## RQ7 — What is character?
@ -86,7 +93,7 @@ succession; Agent functional vs autonomous split. Full typology Phase IV–V.
---
## Resolved / refined (Phase I)
## Resolved / refined (Phase I–II)
| Item | Disposition | Pointer |
|---|---|---|
@ -96,3 +103,8 @@ succession; Agent functional vs autonomous split. Full typology Phase IV–V.
| Identity = Continuity? | **No** — may branch | Parfit; RN-004 |
| Soul = boundary? | **No** — Soul = relation | RN-001 §14 |
| Actor = Being? | **No** | H6; TE-04 |
| Mind = consciousness? | **No** — model-based control | H3; Phase II map |
| Co-adaptation = model exchange? | **No** — joint evolution via interaction | H4; RN-006 |
| Shared intentionality = Social Mind? | **No** — special case of cooperation | RN-006 |
| Recognition creates systemic Being? | **No** — creates/enables Social Beinghood | H7; TE-09 |
| Unrecognized intelligence impossible? | **No** — autonomy without social Beinghood | TE-09 |