Complete Phase II interaction (SOUL-WP-0003)
Map model-based mind, co-adaptive social cognition, and recognition/social Beinghood into instruments and workstream notes. Support H3/H4/H7, judge TE-09, write phase-ii-interaction-synthesis.md, finish SOUL-WP-0003, and mark SOUL-WP-0004 ready.
This commit is contained in:
parent
cb40f77e5a
commit
807d6b17f6
15 changed files with 772 additions and 81 deletions
|
|
@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
|||
# Mind
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** retained / refined (Phase I, 2026-08-12)
|
||||
**Status:** retained / refined (Phase II, 2026-08-12)
|
||||
**Working gloss:** Mind = Model (adaptive control through models)
|
||||
**See also:** H3, H4, RQ3, RN-001, RN-006
|
||||
**See also:** H3, H4, RQ3, RN-001, RN-006, `research/cognitive-science/mind-as-model-map.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## Working definition
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -12,28 +12,62 @@ to guide action.
|
|||
|
||||
> **Mind = Model**
|
||||
|
||||
“Model” means an **action-guiding structure that can be revised**, not only
|
||||
explicit propositional representation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Precedents
|
||||
|
||||
| Tradition | Contribution |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Ashby cybernetics | regulation, variety |
|
||||
| Conant & Ashby 1970 | good regulator requires a model |
|
||||
| Extended / distributed cognition | Mind not confined to a single substrate |
|
||||
| Ashby; Conant & Ashby 1970 | regulation requires a model |
|
||||
| Predictive processing / active inference | generative models unite perception and action |
|
||||
| Inverse planning (Baker et al.) | Other-Model as inference from behavior |
|
||||
| Extended / distributed cognition | Mind not confined to one substrate |
|
||||
| Social cognition (RN-006) | self/other/relation models co-adapt through interaction |
|
||||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
## Social Mind model families
|
||||
|
||||
- Prefer model-based control over intelligence or consciousness as foundation.
|
||||
- “Model” should not be restricted to explicit propositional representation only
|
||||
(enactive critiques remain open — OQ-055).
|
||||
- Co-adaptive model building is joint evolution through interaction, not model exchange.
|
||||
| ID | Model |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| SM1 | World |
|
||||
| SM2 | Self |
|
||||
| SM3 | Other |
|
||||
| SM4 | Reflected-Self |
|
||||
| SM5 | Relationship |
|
||||
| SM6 | Shared Situation |
|
||||
| SM7 | Common Ground |
|
||||
| SM8 | Generalized Social |
|
||||
|
||||
Social Mind is a specialization of Mind for multi-Being interaction — not a
|
||||
second kind of mind.
|
||||
|
||||
## Co-adaptive model building
|
||||
|
||||
Joint evolution of models through interaction (not model exchange). Models can
|
||||
be self-confirming or self-defeating because they change the evidence stream.
|
||||
|
||||
Definition: `research/social-cognition/co-adaptive-model-building.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality metrics (beyond accuracy)
|
||||
|
||||
Calibration, revisability, differentiation of counterparts, perspective
|
||||
separation (mine / yours / yours-of-mine).
|
||||
|
||||
## Crosswalk (Phase II)
|
||||
|
||||
| Adjacent term | Similarity | Difference |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| generative model (PP) | action-guiding predictive structure | PP often neural-centric |
|
||||
| theory of mind | other-modeling | ToM often private; Social Mind is interactional |
|
||||
| common ground | shared acceptance | one model family (SM7), not whole Mind |
|
||||
| participatory sense-making | interaction constitutes understanding | may reject “model” vocabulary |
|
||||
|
||||
## Open issues
|
||||
|
||||
- Minimal model apparatus for a Mind
|
||||
- Recursive depth for social personhood
|
||||
- Collective / distributed Mind boundaries (TE-05)
|
||||
- OQ-055 precise scope of “model”
|
||||
- Recursive depth for personhood (OQ-056)
|
||||
- Collective Mind boundaries (OQ-067)
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
|
||||
`research/foundations/001-*.md`, `Research Note 006 — Social Mind and Co-Adaptive Model Building.md`
|
||||
Phase I foundations 001; Phase II cognitive-science map; RN-006 + references
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,33 +1,50 @@
|
|||
# Recognition
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** revised (Phase I, 2026-08-12)
|
||||
**See also:** H7, RQ6, TE-09, RN-001 Findings 8–10
|
||||
**Status:** revised (Phase II, 2026-08-12)
|
||||
**See also:** H7, RQ6, TE-09, `research/sociology/recognition-and-social-beinghood.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## Three senses
|
||||
|
||||
| Sense | Meaning |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Epistemic | Detect/classify an entity |
|
||||
| Intentional | Treat as agent with goals/beliefs (cf. intentional stance) |
|
||||
| Social / normative | Treat as counterpart in relationships, obligations, reputation |
|
||||
| Sense | Meaning | Adjacent work |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| **Epistemic** | Identify/track as the same entity | reidentification, addressability |
|
||||
| **Intentional** | Treat as agent with goals/beliefs | Dennett intentional stance; Theory of Mind |
|
||||
| **Social / normative** | Standing, perspective, claims matter among us | Honneth recognition theory; Mead; trust/reputation |
|
||||
|
||||
Do not collapse these senses.
|
||||
|
||||
## Layer model
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Autonomous individuality → may exist unrecognized
|
||||
Intentional recognition → treated as agent-like
|
||||
Addressability → can be specifically targeted
|
||||
Social Beinghood → persistent reciprocal models, relations,
|
||||
expectations, commitments, reputation
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Role in Beinghood
|
||||
|
||||
Recognition is **constitutive of social Beinghood**, not of bare autonomous
|
||||
individuality. Beinghood v0.2 includes recognition among requirement families
|
||||
for the intended “someone” category — TE-09 still pressures that packaging.
|
||||
| Level | Role of recognition |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Autonomous individuality | **not required** |
|
||||
| Social Beinghood | **constitutive** (H7) |
|
||||
| Soul Frame “Being” as *someone another can know* | recognition + personhood + addressability on autonomous base (Beinghood v0.2), with TE-09 pressure |
|
||||
|
||||
**Caution:** intentional recognition **over-generates** (APE false positives).
|
||||
Recognition alone does not create systemic individuality (RN-001 Finding 10).
|
||||
|
||||
## Working social principle
|
||||
|
||||
> A system becomes socially relevant as a Being when other beings can distinguish
|
||||
> it, address it, expect continuity from it, maintain models of it, and enter
|
||||
> persistent relationships with it.
|
||||
> A system becomes **socially** relevant as a Being when other beings can
|
||||
> distinguish it, address it, expect continuity from it, maintain models of it,
|
||||
> and enter persistent relationships with it.
|
||||
|
||||
## Related
|
||||
## TE-09 (summary)
|
||||
|
||||
- **Addressability** — ability to target the entity specifically
|
||||
- **Social Being** — embedded in reciprocal models and relations
|
||||
Unrecognized coherent intelligence can be an autonomous individual without
|
||||
Social Beinghood. See sociology map for full judgment.
|
||||
|
||||
## Sources
|
||||
|
||||
RN-001 §9–10; Mead 1934; Phase II sociology pass pending
|
||||
RN-001 §9–10; Mead; Dennett; Honneth; Phase II sociology map; RN-006 (mutual models)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue