coulomb/soul-frame
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Complete SOUL-WP-0009: resolve RQ4 and publication pathway, deliver T02-T05

Browse source 
- T01 (RQ4): retain "Soul" - resolved with operator; Terminology.md,
  concepts/soul.md, OpenQuestions.md, Claims.md, paper/draft.md updated.
- T02: lexicographic continuity-weighting procedure in concepts/identity.md,
  validated against TE-02/03/04/08.
- T03: testable Being-vs-Social-Being boundary (three-part recognition test)
  in concepts/recognition.md and concepts/being.md, validated against
  TE-05/09.
- T04: research/metrics-scoping-note.md - per-axis measurability scoping.
- T05: research/law-governance/moral-legal-personhood-charter.md - bounded
  companion-line charter, explicitly not the mapping itself.
- T06: publication pathway resolved with operator - internal circulation
  only, as paper-one for coulomb-research, following the same staged
  trajectory as coulomb-research's own paper-zero.

Marks SOUL-WP-0009 finished. Opens SOUL-WP-0010 (proposed, not started) to
carry forward the two multi-step residuals from T04/T05.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: sonnet
Assistant-Process: 136745@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 2e334b58-ed31-48ed-8156-d09f8ed0781f
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-09-28 15:59:27 +02:00
parent adbfd1bab4
commit bd79b100c2
12 changed files with 428 additions and 34 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

11
concepts/being.md
View file

@ -42,6 +42,17 @@ Informational process
→ (+ reciprocal relations) → Social Being
```
## Being vs. Social Being — testable boundary (SOUL-WP-0009-T03, resolved 2026-09-28)
See `concepts/recognition.md` for the full three-part test (intentional
recognition + addressability + model persistence across episodes, on at
least one side). Summary for this file's stack diagram: the `→ Being` arrow
requires personhood + addressability + *some* recognition of the candidate;
the `→ Social Being` arrow requires that recognition to specifically be
**persistent and episode-spanning**, not a fresh one-off classification —
this is what distinguishes the two arrows and what makes asymmetric
recognition (TE-09) able to start Social Beinghood on one side alone.
## Notes
- Not restricted to biological organisms; not automatic for every computational process.