Complete SOUL-WP-0009: resolve RQ4 and publication pathway, deliver T02-T05

- T01 (RQ4): retain "Soul" - resolved with operator; Terminology.md,
  concepts/soul.md, OpenQuestions.md, Claims.md, paper/draft.md updated.
- T02: lexicographic continuity-weighting procedure in concepts/identity.md,
  validated against TE-02/03/04/08.
- T03: testable Being-vs-Social-Being boundary (three-part recognition test)
  in concepts/recognition.md and concepts/being.md, validated against
  TE-05/09.
- T04: research/metrics-scoping-note.md - per-axis measurability scoping.
- T05: research/law-governance/moral-legal-personhood-charter.md - bounded
  companion-line charter, explicitly not the mapping itself.
- T06: publication pathway resolved with operator - internal circulation
  only, as paper-one for coulomb-research, following the same staged
  trajectory as coulomb-research's own paper-zero.

Marks SOUL-WP-0009 finished. Opens SOUL-WP-0010 (proposed, not started) to
carry forward the two multi-step residuals from T04/T05.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Assistant: claude-code
Assistant-Model: sonnet
Assistant-Process: 136745@bnt-lap001
Assistant-Session: 2e334b58-ed31-48ed-8156-d09f8ed0781f

paper/draft.md

@@ -1,12 +1,19 @@
 # Soul Frame: A Systems Vocabulary for Person-Like Informational Beings
 
-**Status:** first research-grounded draft (SOUL-WP-0008-T02). Supersedes the
-placeholder that pointed to `SoulFrameIntroduction.md`. Follows
-`paper/outline.md`; sourced from `research/research-synthesis.md`,
-`Terminology.md`, `concepts/*`, `Claims.md`, `ThoughtExperiments.md`, and
-`paper/related-work.md`. Claims below are traceable to Hn / TE-nn / SF-Rxxx
-identifiers rather than asserted freehand; open items are flagged rather than
-resolved.
+**Status:** first research-grounded draft (SOUL-WP-0008-T02), revised under
+SOUL-WP-0009. Supersedes the placeholder that pointed to
+`SoulFrameIntroduction.md`. Follows `paper/outline.md`; sourced from
+`research/research-synthesis.md`, `Terminology.md`, `concepts/*`,
+`Claims.md`, `ThoughtExperiments.md`, and `paper/related-work.md`. Claims
+below are traceable to Hn / TE-nn / SF-Rxxx identifiers rather than asserted
+freehand; open items are flagged rather than resolved.
+
+**Publication pathway (decided 2026-09-28, SOUL-WP-0009-T06):** internal
+circulation only, as **paper-one** for coulomb-research (a research
+facility with a co-creation-science focus, currently being set up).
+Coulomb-research's own paper-zero will run the same staged trajectory —
+internal circulation → pre-print → journal target — and this paper follows
+it rather than jumping ahead.
 
 ---
 
@@ -246,12 +253,14 @@ persists relationally" — Luhmann's system/environment distinction (SF-R004)
 and Maturana & Varela's operational closure (SF-R003) both motivate keeping
 boundary with Being.
 
-**Naming risk, held open (RQ4):** "Soul" collides hard with religious and
+**Naming risk, resolved (RQ4):** "Soul" collides hard with religious and
 folk metaphysical usage. Soul Frame's stance is informational-relational and
 explicitly non-metaphysical — no claim about an immortal essence is made or
-implied. The term is retained provisionally for its compactness and the
-Body/Mind/Soul mnemonic, with the rename question left open rather than
-resolved by this draft (§16, Limitations).
+implied. As of 2026-09-28 the term is **retained** rather than renamed: the
+compactness, the Body/Mind/Soul mnemonic, and the project's own name outweigh
+the collision cost, provided the non-metaphysical disclaimer stays explicit
+and prominent everywhere the term is introduced (decision record:
+`workplans/SOUL-WP-0009-paper-agenda-and-external-review.md` T01).
 
 **Soul-relational continuity can cross Being-identity discontinuities**: a
 relationship, reputation, or set of consequences may continue in some form
@@ -494,8 +503,11 @@ engineering for rather than collapsing:
 Honest accounting, carried from `research-synthesis.md` §9 and the Phase III
 adversarial review still pending (SOUL-WP-0008-T03):
 
-1. **Soul naming risk (RQ4)** is unresolved: retain-with-explicit-disclaimer
-   vs. rename remains open.
+1. **Soul naming risk (RQ4) is resolved** (2026-09-28): retain, with an
+   explicit disclaimer required everywhere the term is introduced. The
+   residual risk is execution — the disclaimer must actually stay prominent
+   in every downstream use of "Soul," not a remaining open question about
+   which term to use.
 2. **Continuity dimension weighting** is unspecified — the framework lists
    dimensions (causal, organizational, psychological, etc.) without a method
    for weighing conflicts between them in hard cases.
@@ -522,7 +534,7 @@ adversarial review still pending (SOUL-WP-0008-T03):
 Carried forward from `research-synthesis.md` §9 and restated as forward work
 rather than resolved here:
 
-1. Resolve RQ4 (retain vs. rename Soul).
+1. ~~Resolve RQ4 (retain vs. rename Soul).~~ **Done 2026-09-28** — retained.
 2. Develop a principled continuity-dimension weighting scheme.
 3. Sharpen Recognition's seat in "Being" vs. "Social Being."
 4. Build moral/legal personhood maps as a **separate**, explicitly-scoped