Add paper-dialogues research line; scaffold Deppert commentary
Establish a parallel comparative-reading track: one external work at a time, with commentary and support/challenge matrix against Soul Frame. First entry is Wolfgang Deppert, Die Evolution des Bewusstseins (bibliographic identity still to lock).
This commit is contained in:
parent
c7c1d18086
commit
c1f4cd37d2
12 changed files with 478 additions and 2 deletions
40
research/paper-dialogues/_template/bibliographic-note.md
Normal file
40
research/paper-dialogues/_template/bibliographic-note.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
|
|||
# Bibliographic note
|
||||
|
||||
## Citation
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Author:
|
||||
Title:
|
||||
Year:
|
||||
Work type: book | chapter | article | essay | preprint
|
||||
Language:
|
||||
Publisher / venue:
|
||||
ISBN / DOI / URL:
|
||||
Edition / pages:
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Access
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Local path or library:
|
||||
Access date:
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Unit of analysis
|
||||
|
||||
What exactly are we dialoguing with (whole work / chapter / essay)?
|
||||
|
||||
## Abstract in the source's own vocabulary
|
||||
|
||||
*(One paragraph. No Soul Frame terms yet.)*
|
||||
|
||||
## Why selected for Soul Frame
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Relevance:
|
||||
Risk (collision / scope creep):
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Status
|
||||
|
||||
`not started | reading | drafting | reviewed | integrated`
|
||||
43
research/paper-dialogues/_template/commentary.md
Normal file
43
research/paper-dialogues/_template/commentary.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
|
|||
# Commentary: <Author> — <Title>
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** draft
|
||||
**Soul Frame instruments:** Terminology, Claims, OpenQuestions
|
||||
**Dialogue dir:** `research/paper-dialogues/<slug>/`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Paper thesis (internal reconstruction)
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Method and scope of the paper
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Translation into Soul Frame vocabulary
|
||||
|
||||
| Paper term / claim | Nearest Soul Frame term | Fit |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| | | good / partial / poor |
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Where Soul Frame is supported
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Where Soul Frame is challenged
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Extensions offered by the paper
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Orthogonal material (park for later)
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Implications for artificial beings / Sp. / Gh. (if any)
|
||||
|
||||
## 9. Proposed follow-ups
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Update `Claims.md`
|
||||
- [ ] Update `OpenQuestions.md`
|
||||
- [ ] Update concept note(s):
|
||||
- [ ] New thought experiment:
|
||||
- [ ] Bibliography entry:
|
||||
|
||||
## 10. Working judgment
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Net effect on Soul Frame:
|
||||
mostly support | mixed | serious challenge | orthogonal
|
||||
One-sentence judgment:
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
|
|||
# Support / challenge matrix
|
||||
|
||||
**Paper:**
|
||||
**Status:** draft
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Paper claim (short) | Soul Frame concept(s) | Verdict | Rationale | Instrument follow-up |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| 1 | | | SUPPORT / CHALLENGE / EXTEND / ORTHOGONAL / UNCLEAR | | |
|
||||
|
||||
## Verdict legend
|
||||
|
||||
| Verdict | Meaning |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| SUPPORT | Strengthens an existing Soul Frame claim or definition |
|
||||
| CHALLENGE | Pressures revision, split, rename, or abandonment |
|
||||
| EXTEND | Adds a useful distinction Soul Frame lacked |
|
||||
| ORTHOGONAL | Interesting but outside current Soul Frame scope |
|
||||
| UNCLEAR | Needs rereading or secondary sources |
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue