Complete Phase III personhood (SOUL-WP-0004)

Map descriptive personhood dimensions P1–P12, four kinds of personhood, and
Character/Persona/Actor separations. Support H2/H8, judge TE-06, write
phase-iii-personhood-synthesis.md, finish SOUL-WP-0004, and mark SOUL-WP-0005
ready.

Claims.md

@@ -45,14 +45,16 @@ Claim: An entity can expose substantial personhood without constituting a
 Soul Frame concept: Personhood, Being, APE
 Supporting literature:
   - RN-003 cases: stateless chatbot (personhood without Beinghood);
-    self-maintaining daemon (autonomy without personhood)
-  - Generative/social agent literature as APE space (pointer)
-Contradicting literature: (Phase III deep dive pending)
-Adjacent terminology: APE, person, agent
-Evidence strength: moderate (conceptual stress tests; full moral-status lit pending)
-Open questions: dimension lists for descriptive personhood
-Required refinement: keep legal/moral personhood out of default usage
-Status: under review (strengthened by Phase I; Phase III pending)
+    self-maintaining daemon (autonomy without personhood); three-axis profiles
+  - Descriptive P1–P12 profile (research/personhood/personhood-dimensions-map.md)
+  - Dennett-style cluster/multi-condition personhood concepts
+  - APE as construction category (Introduction §6)
+Contradicting literature: folk usage equating “person” with full moral/legal status
+Adjacent terminology: APE, person, agent, moral patient, legal person
+Evidence strength: moderate → strong (conceptual); thresholds open
+Open questions: weighting of P1–P12; moral/legal maps stay out of default term
+Required refinement: four kinds of personhood always available for disambiguation
+Status: supported (Phase III)
 ```
 
 ### H3 — Mind is fundamentally model-based
@@ -174,14 +176,19 @@ Status: supported / refined (Phase II)
 ```text
 Claim: A Being can support multiple context-dependent Personae without necessarily
        fragmenting identity.
-Soul Frame concept: Persona, Identity
-Supporting literature: (Phase III primary)
-Contradicting literature: (pending)
-Adjacent terminology: role theory, avatar
-Evidence strength: none → weak (conceptual only so far)
-Open questions: TE-06 The Mask
-Required refinement: Being ≠ Persona ≠ Character ≠ Actor
-Status: draft
+Soul Frame concept: Persona, Identity, Character, Actor
+Supporting literature:
+  - Goffman presentation of self; role theory
+  - Everyday multi-role humans; Introduction §12
+  - research/character-persona/character-persona-performance-map.md; TE-06
+  - RN-004 character ≠ identity constraints
+Contradicting literature: product personas reified as separate agents;
+  extreme dissociation metaphors
+Adjacent terminology: role, avatar, dramatis personae, front-stage
+Evidence strength: moderate
+Open questions: integration thresholds; deception ethics (moral layer)
+Required refinement: Being ≠ Persona ≠ Character ≠ Actor (with failure modes)
+Status: supported (Phase III)
 ```
 
 ### H9 — Agent, Spirit, and Ghost describe provenance and construction