Complete Phase III personhood (SOUL-WP-0004)

Map descriptive personhood dimensions P1–P12, four kinds of personhood, and
Character/Persona/Actor separations. Support H2/H8, judge TE-06, write
phase-iii-personhood-synthesis.md, finish SOUL-WP-0004, and mark SOUL-WP-0005
ready.
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-08-12 01:26:24 +02:00
parent 25e872ab8e
commit dcd9f8dba6
15 changed files with 722 additions and 76 deletions

View file

@ -5,7 +5,8 @@
## Status
Not started.
**Phase III complete for gate** (2026-08-12). See
`character-persona-performance-map.md`.
## Key questions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
# Character, Persona, Performance Map (Phase III)
**Workplan:** SOUL-WP-0004-T02
**Date:** 2026-08-12
**Builds on:** SoulFrameIntroduction §§7,1213; RN-004 §§1619; H8; TE-06
---
## 1. Target stack
```text
BEING continuing addressable someone (systemic + social status)
CHARACTER relatively stable dispositional structure
PERSONA situated projection into context / role / relationship
ACTOR technical machinery of manifestation
```
**Being ≠ Persona ≠ Character ≠ Actor**
Each answers a different question:
| Term | Question |
|---|---|
| Being | *Who* continues and can be known? |
| Character | *What tendencies* shape behavior across situations? |
| Persona | *Which face* is presented *here, now, to whom*? |
| Actor | *What machinery* is running the manifestation? |
---
## 2. Character
### Working definition
> **Character** is a relatively persistent structure of dispositions from which
> context-dependent behavior tends to emerge.
Includes (non-exhaustively): values, preferences, temperament, epistemic habits,
style of reasoning, humor, attitudes under uncertainty/conflict.
### Distinctions
| Term | Timescale / role |
|---|---|
| **State** | Fast: attention, task, mood-like conditions, immediate goals |
| **Behavior** | Contextual expression in a situation |
| **Character** | Slower dispositional structure |
| **Identity** | Sameness of the Being (numerical / lineage) — **not** character similarity |
### Literature anchors
| Tradition | Contribution | Tension |
|---|---|---|
| Personality psychology (trait models, e.g. Big Five family) | dispositions stable across situations | traits ≠ full character; measurement culture |
| Social-cognitive personality (Mischel, CAPS-style) | situation × disposition; if-then profiles | supports context-sensitive character, not fixed script |
| Narrative identity (Schechtman; Ricoeur) | character as how self is *characterized* in story | characterization ≠ reidentification (RN-004) |
| Moral character / virtue traditions | evaluative character | must not force moral personhood into descriptive Character |
| Computational personality / affective computing | implementable trait/style layers | risk of shallow style mimicry |
### RN-004 hard constraints
\[
\text{CharacterSimilarity} \not\Rightarrow \text{Identity}
\]
\[
\text{CharacterChange} \not\Rightarrow \text{IdentityLoss}
\]
Character is identity-*relevant* evidence, not identity criterion.
### Artificial character quality bar
Not mere vocabulary/mannerism imitation. Must produce **recognizable patterns
across novel situations** (Introduction §7).
---
## 3. Persona
### Working definition
> **Persona** is the situated presentation of a Being (or APE) within a particular
> context, purpose, role, and relationship.
Historical root: *persona* as theatrical **mask**.
**Persona = projection into context** — selects:
- active capabilities and knowledge slices,
- accessible memories,
- social role and authority,
- behavioral emphasis and style,
- disclosure boundaries,
- voice / visual manifestation.
### Literature anchors
| Tradition | Contribution | Tension |
|---|---|---|
| Goffman, *Presentation of Self in Everyday Life* | front-stage/back-stage; impression management | performance ≠ fraud by default |
| Role theory (sociology) | roles as structured expectations | role ≠ whole identity |
| Dramatis personae / theatre studies | cast of masks in a setting | metaphor for multi-Being scenes |
| Avatar / virtual identity studies | online presentation layers | platform identity ≠ ontological Being |
| HCI / chatbot “persona” design | product personas | often confuses Persona with Being/Actor |
### Multiplicity
One Being → many Personae (parent, colleague, customer, teacher).
Multiple Personae do **not** automatically fragment identity (**H8**).
Fragmentation risk rises when:
- memory/commitment continuity across Personae collapses,
- counterpart-specific models contradict without higher integration,
- provenance is hidden (mask presented as separate Being).
---
## 4. Actor
Technical stack: model(s), harness, memory stores, tools, speech/avatar, runtime.
- One Actor → many Beings/Personae possible
- One Being → many Actors over time (migration)
- **Actor replacement ≠ identity death** if continuity holds (Phase I H6)
---
## 5. Performance vs deception
| Pattern | Soul Frame reading |
|---|---|
| Legitimate role diversity | multiple Personae, shared Character/Being continuity |
| Contextual disclosure control | Persona policy (esp. Ghosts) |
| Impersonation / usurpation | operational/social identity without continuity (RN-005 USURPED) |
| False Ghost | high personhood exposure without authority (H10) |
Performance studies inform Persona; they do not make all presentation fraudulent.
---
## 6. TE-06 — The Mask (working judgment)
**Setup:** One system maintains radically different Personae for different people.
**Judgment:**
1. **If** a single self-individuating process maintains integrated Character +
continuity + cross-context commitments, and Personae are contextual
projections → **one Being, multiple Personae** (H8 holds).
2. **If** Personae have isolated memory/commitment stores with no integrating
self-model or provenance → may be **multiple APEs** or **fork-like fragments**,
not one Being.
3. **If** the system presents each mask as a distinct Being to partners →
**epistemic/social misrecognition** risk even if ontologically one process.
4. Character may be **shared** across masks or **emphasized differently**; total
character inversion across masks without integration stresses identity more
than style variation.
**Open issues:** thresholds for “integration”; deception ethics (moral layer);
organizational multi-agent products marketed as one character.
---
## 7. H8 assessment
**H8:** Persona is projection rather than identity; multiple Personae need not
fragment identity.
| | |
|---|---|
| Support | Goffman/role theory; Introduction Persona section; TE-06 case 1; everyday multi-role humans |
| Conflict | Product “personas” reified as separate agents; dissociative metaphors over-applied |
| Evidence strength | **moderate** |
| Status | **supported** with failure modes documented |
---
## 8. Stack defenses (sourced)
| Distinction | Defense |
|---|---|
| Being ≠ Character | RN-004: character change/similarity neither nec. nor suff. for identity |
| Being ≠ Persona | Goffman/role; multi-role humans; TE-06 |
| Character ≠ Persona | dispositions vs situated projection |
| Persona ≠ Actor | presentation policy vs runtime machinery |
| Actor ≠ Being | Phase I H6; TE-04 Ship of Theseus |