# Open Questions Register Questions that remain unresolved or contested. Link related entries in `Claims.md`, `ThoughtExperiments.md`, and `concepts/` where helpful. **Phase I update:** 2026-08-12 — several RQs refined; detail OQs from RN-005/006 indexed below. --- ## RQ1 — What constitutes a Being? **Phase I status:** refined, not closed. Working answer: multi-layer profile (autonomous individuality + personhood + addressability + recognition). Still open: - Weighting and thresholds of B1–B8 - Observer-relative individuation without arbitrariness - Nested levels (colony, collective, multi-Body) ## RQ2 — What constitutes personhood? **Phase I status:** deferred to Phase III; necessity of *some* personhood layer for Beinghood established (daemon false positive). - Descriptive vs social vs moral vs legal still must stay distinct - Dimension list for descriptive personhood incomplete ## RQ3 — What constitutes a Mind? **Phase II status:** model-based reading **supported** (H3); Social Mind SM1–SM8 architecture adopted provisionally. Remaining: - Precise definition of “model” (OQ-055) — inclusive working def in concepts/mind.md - Minimal apparatus for non-social vs social Mind - Recursive depth for personhood (OQ-056) - When common ground becomes collective Mind (OQ-067) ## RQ4 — What constitutes a Soul? **Phase I–II status:** revised definition (boundary removed); **not closed**. Phase II ends by pointing to Cluster D: what persists from interactions beyond immediate models (relational persistence = Soul’s domain). - Rename vs retain “Soul” - Packaging: relations vs consequences vs both - Relation to lineage after identity ends ## RQ5 — How does identity persist? **Phase I status:** structure clarified (Identity ≠ Continuity ≠ Lineage); open: - Continuity weighting (OQ-043) - Dormancy ontology (OQ-046/047) - Fork rights and relationship branching (OQ-050/051) - Ghost authority and gradual transition (OQ-052/053) - Merge responsibility (OQ-054) ## RQ6 — How does recognition create social beinghood? **Phase II status:** **refined answer available** — recognition constitutive of *social* Beinghood, not bare autonomous individuality; three senses fixed; TE-09 judged. Remaining: - Exact label policy for Beinghood v0.2 vs “autonomous individual” - Minimal intentional vs social recognition conditions - Moral/legal recognition deferred to Phase III ## RQ7 — What is character? **Phase I status:** deferred (Phase III); character neither necessary nor sufficient for identity (RN-004). ## RQ8 — What kinds of artificial Being exist? **Phase I status:** partial — Sp. begins new lineage; Gh. defaults to authorized succession; Agent functional vs autonomous split. Full typology Phase IV–V. ## Cross-cutting - Memory vs continuity thresholds - Operational / identity / social death / legacy interactions - Law/governance map (Phase V/XII) - Fiction as conceptual laboratory (Phase VI/XIII) ### Indexed OQs from research notes | ID | Topic | Note | |---|---|---| | OQ-043–054 | Identity continuity governance | RN-005 | | OQ-055–068 | Social mind / co-adaptation | RN-006 | --- ## Resolved / refined (Phase I–II) | Item | Disposition | Pointer | |---|---|---| | Boundary belongs to Soul? | **No** — boundary to Being | RN-001 SF-C002 | | Autonomy alone = Beinghood? | **No** | RN-003 principal falsification | | Identity = memory dump? | **No** | RN-004/005 | | Identity = Continuity? | **No** — may branch | Parfit; RN-004 | | Soul = boundary? | **No** — Soul = relation | RN-001 §14 | | Actor = Being? | **No** | H6; TE-04 | | Mind = consciousness? | **No** — model-based control | H3; Phase II map | | Co-adaptation = model exchange? | **No** — joint evolution via interaction | H4; RN-006 | | Shared intentionality = Social Mind? | **No** — special case of cooperation | RN-006 | | Recognition creates systemic Being? | **No** — creates/enables Social Beinghood | H7; TE-09 | | Unrecognized intelligence impossible? | **No** — autonomy without social Beinghood | TE-09 |