# Claim and Evidence Register Structured research records for important Soul Frame propositions. Each entry should follow: ```text Claim: Soul Frame concept: Supporting literature: Contradicting literature: Adjacent terminology: Evidence strength: Open questions: Required refinement: Status: draft | under review | supported | contested | revised | rejected ``` Evidence strength (working scale): | Level | Meaning | |---|---| | `none` | Speculative / programmatic only | | `weak` | Sparse analogy or single tradition | | `moderate` | Multiple sources, incomplete synthesis | | `strong` | Broad, well-aligned support | | `mixed` | Significant support and contradiction | --- ## Working hypotheses (from Research Program) ### H1 — Beinghood is multidimensional ```text Claim: Beinghood cannot be reduced to a single property such as intelligence, consciousness, or autonomy. Soul Frame concept: Being Supporting literature: (pending) Contradicting literature: (pending) Adjacent terminology: autopoiesis, agency, personhood, autonomy Evidence strength: none Open questions: binary vs threshold vs multidimensional degree Required refinement: operational criteria / dimensions Status: draft ``` ### H2 — Personhood and Beinghood are distinct ```text Claim: An entity can expose substantial personhood without constituting a persistent Being. Soul Frame concept: Personhood, Being Supporting literature: (pending) Contradicting literature: (pending) Adjacent terminology: person, agent, moral patient Evidence strength: none Open questions: boundary cases (companions, chatbots, animals) Required refinement: dimension lists and thresholds Status: draft ``` ### H3 — Mind is fundamentally model-based ```text Claim: Adaptive modeling provides a more useful foundation for Mind in Soul Frame than intelligence or consciousness alone. Soul Frame concept: Mind Supporting literature: (pending) Contradicting literature: (pending) Adjacent terminology: predictive processing, active inference, control theory Evidence strength: none Open questions: relation to embodiment; non-model-based accounts of mind Required refinement: definition of "model" in this framework Status: draft ``` ### H4 — Social cognition is co-adaptive ```text Claim: Persistent interaction between beings produces recursively adapting models of self, other, and relationship. Soul Frame concept: Co-adaptive model building, Mind Supporting literature: (pending) Contradicting literature: (pending) Adjacent terminology: theory of mind, interactive alignment, common ground Evidence strength: none Open questions: minimum requirements for "co-adaptation" Required refinement: relation to existing multi-agent and ToM literature Status: draft ``` ### H5 — Soul can be operationalized relationally ```text Claim: Soul can be given a meaningful systems interpretation through identity, boundary, relationship, provenance, history, and persistent influence. Soul Frame concept: Soul Supporting literature: (pending) Contradicting literature: (pending) Adjacent terminology: structural coupling, extended mind, reputation, legacy Evidence strength: none Open questions: boundary vs relations vs accumulated consequences Required refinement: terminology collision analysis for "Soul" Status: draft ``` ### H6 — Identity is substrate-independent but continuity-dependent ```text Claim: Replacing the technical Actor need not replace the Being, provided sufficient continuity is preserved. Soul Frame concept: Identity, Actor, Being Supporting literature: (pending) Contradicting literature: (pending) Adjacent terminology: psychological continuity, Ship of Theseus, functionalism Evidence strength: none Open questions: what continuity is sufficient; forking/merging Required refinement: persistence conditions Status: draft ``` ### H7 — Recognition is constitutive of social Beinghood ```text Claim: Being recognized as a persistent counterpart changes the systemic role of an entity; social Beinghood depends on recognition. Soul Frame concept: Recognition, Being Supporting literature: (pending) Contradicting literature: (pending) Adjacent terminology: recognition theory, intersubjectivity, social construction Evidence strength: none Open questions: systemic existence vs social recognition of existence Required refinement: whether Beinghood without recognition is coherent Status: draft ``` ### H8 — Persona is a projection rather than an identity ```text Claim: A Being can support multiple context-dependent Personae without necessarily fragmenting identity. Soul Frame concept: Persona, Identity Supporting literature: (pending) Contradicting literature: (pending) Adjacent terminology: role theory, avatar, dramatis personae Evidence strength: none Open questions: when persona fragmentation threatens identity Required refinement: Being ≠ Persona ≠ Character ≠ Actor Status: draft ``` ### H9 — Agent, Spirit, and Ghost describe provenance and construction ```text Claim: Agent, Spirit, and Ghost should not automatically be treated as mutually exclusive kinds of Being; they are genealogical or architectural descriptors. Soul Frame concept: Agent, Spirit, Ghost Supporting literature: (pending) Contradicting literature: (pending) Adjacent terminology: agent, digital human, posthumous avatar Evidence strength: none Open questions: overlaps and hybrid constructions Required refinement: typology vs dimensions Status: draft ``` ### H10 — Ghosthood requires authority ```text Claim: Technical fidelity alone is insufficient for legitimate Gh. status; legitimate authority over the represented identity is required. Soul Frame concept: Ghost Supporting literature: (pending) Contradicting literature: (pending) Adjacent terminology: personality rights, consent, digital legacy, fiduciary duty Evidence strength: none Open questions: succession, commercial use, false ghosts Required refinement: governance model for Ghosts Status: draft ``` --- ## Additional claims *(Add numbered claims as literature work proceeds. Prefer refining existing entries over proliferating near-duplicates.)*