tegwick
c1f4cd37d2
Establish a parallel comparative-reading track: one external work at a time, with commentary and support/challenge matrix against Soul Frame. First entry is Wolfgang Deppert, Die Evolution des Bewusstseins (bibliographic identity still to lock).
140 lines
4.5 KiB
Text
140 lines
4.5 KiB
Text
Soul Frame — Paper Dialogues
|
|
============================
|
|
|
|
Purpose
|
|
-------
|
|
This research line takes one external paper (or book chapter / essay) at a time
|
|
and reads it *in dialogue* with Soul Frame.
|
|
|
|
The goal is not a full literature review and not a hostile refutation exercise.
|
|
|
|
The goal is:
|
|
|
|
1. understand the paper on its own terms,
|
|
2. translate its claims into (or against) Soul Frame vocabulary,
|
|
3. record where Soul Frame is supported, extended, challenged, or forced
|
|
to revise terminology,
|
|
4. feed durable findings back into Claims.md, Terminology.md, OpenQuestions.md,
|
|
and concept notes when warranted.
|
|
|
|
This line runs in parallel with the main research phases and the eventual paper.
|
|
It may delay or reshape the Soul Frame paper when a strong challenge appears.
|
|
|
|
|
|
What a dialogue produces
|
|
------------------------
|
|
Each selected work gets its own subdirectory under:
|
|
|
|
research/paper-dialogues/<NNN>-<author-short-slug>/
|
|
|
|
Recommended contents:
|
|
|
|
bibliographic-note.md
|
|
Full citation, language, access path, genre, one-paragraph abstract
|
|
in the paper's own vocabulary (not yet Soul Frame translation).
|
|
|
|
reading-notes.md
|
|
Section-by-section or claim-by-claim notes while reading.
|
|
Prefer short quotations with page numbers where available.
|
|
|
|
commentary.md
|
|
Structured comparative essay:
|
|
- paper thesis
|
|
- Soul Frame translation
|
|
- agreements
|
|
- tensions / challenges
|
|
- open questions raised for Soul Frame
|
|
- proposed follow-ups (claims, TEs, terminology edits)
|
|
|
|
support-challenge-matrix.md
|
|
Table mapping paper claims -> Soul Frame concepts ->
|
|
support | challenge | orthogonal | unclear
|
|
with brief rationale.
|
|
|
|
Optional:
|
|
|
|
glossary-bridge.md
|
|
Term-by-term map (paper term <-> Soul Frame term).
|
|
|
|
excerpts.md
|
|
Longer excerpts reserved for fair-use/private working notes only;
|
|
do not publish copyrighted text beyond fair quotation practice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Method (standing procedure)
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
For each paper:
|
|
|
|
Step 1 — Bibliographic lock
|
|
Fix citation, edition, language, and what counts as the unit of analysis
|
|
(whole book vs chapter vs essay).
|
|
|
|
Step 2 — Internal reconstruction
|
|
State the paper's problem, method, main claims, and conclusion *without*
|
|
Soul Frame jargon. Misrepresentation here invalidates the dialogue.
|
|
|
|
Step 3 — Vocabulary bridge
|
|
For each key term in the paper, note nearest Soul Frame terms and
|
|
mismatches (false friends).
|
|
|
|
Step 4 — Support / challenge pass
|
|
Explicitly mark:
|
|
SUPPORT — strengthens a Soul Frame claim or definition
|
|
CHALLENGE — pressures revision, rename, split, or abandonment
|
|
EXTEND — adds a useful distinction Soul Frame lacked
|
|
ORTHOGONAL — interesting but outside current scope
|
|
UNCLEAR — needs rereading or secondary sources
|
|
|
|
Step 5 — Feedback into instruments
|
|
If a challenge is serious, open or update:
|
|
- OpenQuestions.md
|
|
- Claims.md (evidence / contradicting literature)
|
|
- concepts/*.md
|
|
- ThoughtExperiments.md (if a new edge case appears)
|
|
Do not silently rewrite Terminology to absorb the paper.
|
|
|
|
Step 6 — Close the dialogue
|
|
Commentary status: draft | reviewed | integrated
|
|
Note which Soul Frame instruments were updated (if any).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison focus (Soul Frame side)
|
|
----------------------------------
|
|
Always ask at least:
|
|
|
|
- What counts as a system / individual / being?
|
|
- Body / Mind / Soul triad: fit, force-fit, or reject?
|
|
- Consciousness: first-person vs third-person recognition
|
|
- Identity / continuity / lineage
|
|
- Personhood (descriptive / social / moral / legal)
|
|
- Recognition and co-adaptive modeling
|
|
- Implications for artificial beings, Sp., Gh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Naming convention
|
|
-----------------
|
|
NNN-author-short-slug/
|
|
|
|
Examples:
|
|
001-deppert-evolution-des-bewusstseins/
|
|
002-park-generative-agents/
|
|
|
|
NNN is a local sequence number in this directory, not a claim ID.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relation to other research dirs
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
research/foundations/ long thematic notes
|
|
research/paper-dialogues/ one-paper comparative commentaries (this line)
|
|
sources/bibliography.md index entries for durable citations
|
|
sources/source-notes/ optional short notes linked from bibliography
|
|
|
|
After a dialogue matures, add a bibliography entry under sources/bibliography.md
|
|
with pointer path back here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Status
|
|
------
|
|
Line established: 2026-08-12
|
|
First paper: Wolfgang Deppert — Die Evolution des Bewusstseins
|
|
-> 001-deppert-evolution-des-bewusstseins/
|