feat(workplan): collision refusal verified live on net-kingdom
Returns refused naming ADHOC-2026-08-23 and its holder, instead of IntegrityError. Records that a first check against the cache returned refused via the retirement path and was nearly reported as proof — the output looked like success while testing nothing of the sort. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 2583210@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: f2bff2d5-e9b2-4338-92ca-10282a927006
This commit is contained in:
parent
3f7307f665
commit
7c45534115
1 changed files with 14 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -518,3 +518,17 @@ created the same daily identifier on the same day.
|
|||
The reset must detect that a derived identifier belongs to another repository and
|
||||
refuse with that stated, rather than failing on a database constraint. A refusal
|
||||
is a decision the caller can act on; a constraint violation is a stack trace.
|
||||
|
||||
**Fixed and verified live (2026-08-26, `main-5e4d0be`).** `net-kingdom` now
|
||||
returns `refused` with reason *"derived identifier already belongs to another
|
||||
repository"*, naming `ADHOC-2026-08-23` and the holder.
|
||||
|
||||
Acknowledging retirements deliberately does not authorise a collision: those are
|
||||
different decisions — one says the work is gone, the other says take an
|
||||
identifier another repository owns — and conflating them would let a routine
|
||||
acknowledgement carry an identity change through. Covered by test.
|
||||
|
||||
Worth recording how nearly this was mis-reported. A first check run against the
|
||||
*cache* returned `refused` and was almost reported as proof; it had exercised the
|
||||
retirement path instead, because the cache does not hold the colliding record.
|
||||
The output looked like success while testing nothing of the sort.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue