target-revenue/specs/OpenQuestions-WorkingDefaults.md

217 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

# Open Questions — Stage 0 Working Defaults
**Status:** Provisional (non-normative until promoted into core specs)
**Date:** 2026-07-28
**Authority:** Unblocks schema enums, golden fixtures, and draft legal skeleton. Does **not** finalize legal policy.
**Sources:** PRD §14, concept §24, SWOT I-09
**Promotion rule:** Moving a default into `TargetRevenueFrameworkCore.md` or TRSL draft requires human accept (SCOPE §4).
---
## How to read this document
| Label | Meaning |
| --- | --- |
| **Working default** | Use this in Stage 0 schemas, examples, and validators |
| **Blocked on research** | No default yet; do not invent in code as if normative |
| **Blocked on legal** | Needs specialist input; skeleton may mark `[LEGAL]` only |
Each item maps to PRD open question numbers in parentheses.
---
## Q1 — Noncommercial rights during protected Phase (1)
**Working default (documentation only):**
During a protected Phase, noncommercial users may view source, evaluate, test, and use for personal, research, and educational purposes consistent with a PolyForm-Noncommercial-style scope — exact clause text is **blocked on legal**.
**Schema impact:** No mandatory machine field beyond Future License and Phase status.
**Not decided:** Contractor-on-behalf-of-enterprise edge cases (see Q2).
---
## Q2 — Definition of commercial use (2)
Accept TRSL V1C1 (WP-0001-T06): objective Commercial Use definition Bernd reviewed the License candidate and accepted it, conditioned on one refinement to §1's "Commercial Use" definition: replaces the prior circular definition ("use other than Noncommercial Use") with an objective, billing-based trigger. Commercial Use now means billing a customer for pre-conversion Software use, full stop - regardless of whether the resulting payment is registered with the Trust Service. Billing without recording the payment in the Target Ledger is Commercial Use without a valid Commercial Entitlement, a Section 3 violation addressed under Section 7 and, where applicable, the Enforcement Network. This substantially resolves the affiliate/contractor/mixed-purpose/ public-sector ambiguity Appendix A item 1 flagged, since classification no longer depends on who the customer is, only on whether they are billed. A narrower residual item remains open: whether consumer- protection law overrides this classification for an individual/sole- proprietor customer in a given jurisdiction (the same recurring pattern found across WP-0004's jurisdiction research). Updates the document's status banner: condition 3 (human acceptance) is now met; conditions 1 (specialist legal review) and 2 (full Appendix A resolution) remain open - V1C1 is accepted as adequate briefing material for counsel, not yet official Version 1.0. Marks WP-0001-T06 done and the WP-0001 workplan finished (all 6 tasks complete). Updates OpenQuestions-WorkingDefaults.md Q2, README, and CONTRIBUTING.md to match. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-29 19:30:41 +02:00
**Adopted 2026-07-29 (maintainer accept, `specs/TargetRevenueSourceLicense-V1C1.md` §1):**
Commercial Use is defined objectively as billing, invoicing, or otherwise charging any customer for or in connection with use of the Software before the Conversion Event — regardless of whether the resulting payment is registered with the Trust Service. This replaces the prior circular "use other than Noncommercial Use" framing with a mechanically checkable trigger (the act of billing), which substantially resolves the affiliate/contractor/mixed-purpose/public-sector ambiguity below, since classification no longer depends on who the customer is, only on whether they are billed.
Accept TRSL V1C1 (WP-0001-T06): objective Commercial Use definition Bernd reviewed the License candidate and accepted it, conditioned on one refinement to §1's "Commercial Use" definition: replaces the prior circular definition ("use other than Noncommercial Use") with an objective, billing-based trigger. Commercial Use now means billing a customer for pre-conversion Software use, full stop - regardless of whether the resulting payment is registered with the Trust Service. Billing without recording the payment in the Target Ledger is Commercial Use without a valid Commercial Entitlement, a Section 3 violation addressed under Section 7 and, where applicable, the Enforcement Network. This substantially resolves the affiliate/contractor/mixed-purpose/ public-sector ambiguity Appendix A item 1 flagged, since classification no longer depends on who the customer is, only on whether they are billed. A narrower residual item remains open: whether consumer- protection law overrides this classification for an individual/sole- proprietor customer in a given jurisdiction (the same recurring pattern found across WP-0004's jurisdiction research). Updates the document's status banner: condition 3 (human acceptance) is now met; conditions 1 (specialist legal review) and 2 (full Appendix A resolution) remain open - V1C1 is accepted as adequate briefing material for counsel, not yet official Version 1.0. Marks WP-0001-T06 done and the WP-0001 workplan finished (all 6 tasks complete). Updates OpenQuestions-WorkingDefaults.md Q2, README, and CONTRIBUTING.md to match. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-29 19:30:41 +02:00
**Still blocked on legal:** whether consumer-protection law in a given jurisdiction overrides this classification for an individual/sole-proprietor customer — see `history/260729-TRSL-Jurisdiction-StandardTerms.md` §4 item 2 and the recurring B2B/consumer pattern found across `workplans/TREV-WP-0004-global-jurisdiction-research.md` (Germany/EU, US via CCPA, Argentina).
Accept TRSL V1C1 (WP-0001-T06): objective Commercial Use definition Bernd reviewed the License candidate and accepted it, conditioned on one refinement to §1's "Commercial Use" definition: replaces the prior circular definition ("use other than Noncommercial Use") with an objective, billing-based trigger. Commercial Use now means billing a customer for pre-conversion Software use, full stop - regardless of whether the resulting payment is registered with the Trust Service. Billing without recording the payment in the Target Ledger is Commercial Use without a valid Commercial Entitlement, a Section 3 violation addressed under Section 7 and, where applicable, the Enforcement Network. This substantially resolves the affiliate/contractor/mixed-purpose/ public-sector ambiguity Appendix A item 1 flagged, since classification no longer depends on who the customer is, only on whether they are billed. A narrower residual item remains open: whether consumer- protection law overrides this classification for an individual/sole- proprietor customer in a given jurisdiction (the same recurring pattern found across WP-0004's jurisdiction research). Updates the document's status banner: condition 3 (human acceptance) is now met; conditions 1 (specialist legal review) and 2 (full Appendix A resolution) remain open - V1C1 is accepted as adequate briefing material for counsel, not yet official Version 1.0. Marks WP-0001-T06 done and the WP-0001 workplan finished (all 6 tasks complete). Updates OpenQuestions-WorkingDefaults.md Q2, README, and CONTRIBUTING.md to match. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-29 19:30:41 +02:00
**Stage 0 practice:** Golden examples assume a paying "commercial entitlement" for any company production use; do not encode a full classifier in the fold library — the License's billing-based trigger is a legal/contractual definition, not a Stage 0 schema field.
---
## Q3 — Future License options (3)
**Working default:**
Both **MIT** and **Apache-2.0** are allowed `phase.future_license` enum values. Phase authors choose one at publication; default in examples is **MIT**.
**Patent treatment of pre-conversion phase:** Express patent license for permitted uses is **blocked on legal** (WP-0001-T03). Schemas allow Future License enum only; no separate patent field required in Stage 0.
---
## Q4 — Target Multiple classes (4)
**Working default:**
`target_multiple` is an **open decimal** ≥ 0. The 0x / 1x / 10x / 100x / 1000x labels are **guidance classes** (concept §7.4), not a closed enum.
**Stage 0 practice:** Examples use 100. Validators accept any non-negative decimal; may **warn** (not fail) if value is not in `{0,1,10,100,1000}`.
---
## Q5 — Development-cost components in target basis (5)
**Working default:**
Target basis transparency fields: `estimated_effort_days`, `daily_rate` (or equivalent published rate), `approved_direct_costs`.
`Initial Target = (effort × rate + direct costs) × target_multiple` when basis is fully supplied.
**Excluded from Stage 0 basis by default:** Marketing, general overhead, unrelated R&D, opportunity cost, and speculative “market value” uplifts not expressed via Target Multiple.
**Blocked on research/legal:** Employee vs contractor rate disclosure norms; mandatory audit of direct costs.
---
## Q6 — Currency and FX (6)
**Working default:**
A Phase has **one native currency** (`phase.initial_target.currency`). All ledger entries for that Phase **must** use the same currency in Stage 0.
**Schema rule:** Reject entry currency mismatches. No FX conversion in the pure fold.
**Later:** Optional FX extension may be registered; until then multi-currency Phases are out of scope.
---
## Q7 — Progress-sensitive degeneration formula (7)
**Adopted 2026-07-29** (`workplans/TREV-WP-0007-degeneration-policy-and-canonical-profiles.md` T02, maintainer-accepted): `trsl:policy:linear-longstop-v0` is confirmed as the v1 norm for the first pilot cohort, not merely a Stage 0 pilot placeholder.
**The policy's own definition** (formula, schedule, and the not-yet-adopted `progress-paused-longstop-v1` candidate) lives at `specs/policies/linear-longstop-v0.md` (WP-0015-T02) — this entry is the *decision record* ("this is the accepted v1 norm, adopted 2026-07-29"), not the policy's content.
---
## Q8 — Fixed Longstop Date (8)
**Working default:**
**Every Phase MUST declare a Longstop Date** (or equivalent full-remission instant) in the Phase Manifest for Stage 0 conformance.
**Schema:** Treat `phase.longstop_at` (ISO 8601) as **Required** for Stage 0 validators (extension of TSD §3.1 recommended fields → required under working defaults).
**Rationale:** Prevents indefinite restriction if the product hypothesis fails (PRD risk table; concept §13.3).
---
## Q9 — Public metrics mandatory set (9)
**Working default — mandatory public facts:**
- Initial Target, currency
- Cumulative Development Credit
- Cumulative Remission Credit
- Outstanding Target
- Conversion status
- Last ledger entry id / checkpoint hash
- Longstop timestamp
**Recommended:** Development Credit velocity; time since last material Development Credit; forecast conversion date **labeled as forecast only**.
**Optional:** Contributor diversity counts; confidence ranges.
---
## Q10 — Minimum evidence for Development Credit (10)
**Working default — tiered evidence references:**
| Tier | `evidence_reference` | When |
| --- | --- | --- |
| E0 | Opaque internal id (`confidential:…`) | Allowed in Stage 0 fixtures; insufficient for external audit claims |
| E1 | Settled payment reference (processor/id) | Minimum for any public claim of Development Credit in a pilot |
| E2 | Contract + invoice + settlement set | Recommended for disputed or high-value credits |
**Recognition event (see extension contract):** Working default **`payment-settled`** only. Invoice/order without settlement do not create Development Credit in Stage 0 fold inputs.
**Blocked on legal:** Audit rights wording and confidential evidence disclosure process.
---
## Q11 — First canonical extensions (11)
**Working default — Stage 0 catalog targets:**
1. `development-license` — default development_allocation 100% of settled development fee (net of tax/refunds per extension)
2. `cost-plus-operations` — default development_allocation 0%
3. `phase-sponsorship` — development_allocation **explicitly declared** per transaction
4. `service-with-development-allocation` — default 0%; explicit split when reusable work enters Milestone
5. `product-ideation` — default 0% or declared
6. `general-consulting` — default 0%
Status `canonical` requires documented review; Stage 0 may ship them as `registered` examples first.
---
## Q12 — Disputes, audits, operator conflicts (12)
**Working default (process stub):**
1. Ledger is append-only; disputes create compensating entries, not silent edits.
2. Conversion already triggered remains irrevocable (Rule 9) even if a later dispute reduces Development Credit — shortfall is a commercial/audit matter, not re-restriction.
3. When the Trust Service operator is also a Phase licensor, attestations must be independently re-computable offline; public metrics must not depend on private operator judgment.
2026-07-29 11:00:25 +02:00
4. **(Added 2026-07-29, TRSL V1C1 §7.4)** Breach notices, cure status, and termination determinations for a Phase are published by the Trust Service as a public conformity signal, distinguishing `alleged` from `determined`. Publication is a ministerial record of the Licensor's (or a dispute process's) determination — the Trust Service does not itself decide whether a breach occurred.
5. **(Revised 2026-07-29, TRSL V1C1 §7.4 / Appendix A item 10 — blocked on legal)** Whether a published breach record names the affected Commercial Entitlement holder is governed by the applicable Commercial Use Agreement, not a License-wide default — the License itself only guarantees an anonymized Phase-and-category fallback where no Commercial Use Agreement addresses it or none exists. The open item is now drafting the Commercial Use Agreement template's own naming/consent/data-protection clause, not a License-text decision.
**Blocked on governance:** Full dispute SLA and third-party auditor program (PRD Phase 7).
---
## Q13 — Trust Service discontinuity (13)
**Working default:**
- Conversion is a pure function of Manifest + Ledger; offline recompute must remain possible.
- Every Phase SHOULD be exportable as a **phase evidence package** (manifest, ledger chain, extension snapshots, optional attestation).
- Operator failure must not be interpretable as “not converted” if Outstanding Target is already zero.
**Stage 0 delivery:** Specify package layout in WP-0002 golden example; full archival SLA later.
---
## Q14 — Cryptography / federation protocol (14)
**Working default for Stage 0 library:**
- Hash chain: SHA-256 over a canonical serialization of the previous entry (canonicalization algorithm fixed in schema ADR).
- Signatures: **Ed25519** over the same canonical bytes; public keys in a simple key registry file for examples.
- Key rotation: append-only key history document; not a multi-party federation protocol.
**Blocked on research:** Full federation discovery, threshold attestation, multi-operator conflict resolution.
---
## Q15 — Governance path (15)
**Working default:**
Founder/maintainer-controlled experimentation under this SCOPE until `TRSL-Governance.md` exists. Core term changes require human accept; extensions may be registered as conformant without being canonical.
---
## Schema checklist derived from defaults
Stage 0 validators SHOULD enforce:
1. Phase native currency consistency on all entries.
2. `longstop_at` present on every Phase Manifest.
3. Development Credit entries only with `recognition` consistent with payment-settled inputs (when extension data present).
4. `future_license` ∈ {`MIT`, `Apache-2.0`}.
5. Closed ledger entry type enum from TSD §3.2.
6. Outstanding Target = `max(0, T0 - C - R)` pure fold.
7. Conversion Attestation never required to compute conversion status.
---
## Revision history
| Date | Change |
| --- | --- |
| 2026-07-28 | Initial working defaults from SWOT I-09 / Stage 0 unblocking |