WP-0003-T06 review: accept MonetizationExtensionSpecification.md, no fix needed

Verified the six-field extension contract matches concept §12's YAML
verbatim, the core-term redefinition list matches (consistent with the
item 1 fix), registered/canonical wording matches concept §12.1-§12.2, and
the six canonical candidates match concept §12.2's list in the same order
with product-ideation/general-consulting honestly labeled as not yet
fixture-backed rather than implied complete.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

workplans/TREV-WP-0003-normative-core-extraction.md

@@ -220,10 +220,17 @@ accept):
       `administrative-correction-development` / `-remission` (maintainer's
       choice of option (a)); this was the one place the extraction added
       interpretation beyond a direct concept citation, and it is now closed.
-- [ ] `specs/MonetizationExtensionSpecification.md` — six-field contract
+- [x] `specs/MonetizationExtensionSpecification.md` — six-field contract
       matches concept §12; registered/canonical distinction matches concept
       §12.1–§12.2; Stage 0 catalog table (Q11) correctly shows
       `product-ideation` and `general-consulting` as not yet fixture-backed.
+      **Reviewed and accepted 2026-07-29, no fix needed** — six fields
+      (value/pricing/allocation/recognition/reversal/evidence) match
+      concept §12's YAML verbatim; the redefinition list matches (fixed
+      alongside item 1); registered/canonical wording matches §12.1/§12.2;
+      the six canonical candidates match concept §12.2's list in the same
+      order, with the two unfixtured profiles honestly labeled rather than
+      implied complete.
 - [ ] Cross-links (T05) — confirm PRD §6.1/§6.2, TSD §0/§1.1, README, and
       CONTRIBUTING.md all point at the new extracts without contradicting
       `specs/TargetRevenueLicenseConcept.md` as ultimate authority.