coulomb/target-revenue
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Merge spec/ into specs/: one specs directory for the whole repo

Browse source 
Moves TargetRevenueLicenseConcept.md from the separate singular spec/
directory into specs/ (git mv, preserving history) and updates every live
cross-reference (README, CONTRIBUTING, all specs/*.md, workplans, schema
comments, source docstrings, test file) to the new path.

This resolves the spec/ vs specs/ split that history/260728-SWOT-Assessment.md
flagged as a "perpetual footgun" and recommended deciding on. The historical
record of that split and the recommendation itself are left unedited in
history/ (a dated assessment, not a living document) — only README and TSD
now document the merge as resolved, with a pointer back to that history file
for context.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-07-29 10:22:14 +02:00
parent 458d3a3b60
commit 55a1756f7c
20 changed files with 67 additions and 63 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
workplans/TREV-WP-0003-normative-core-extraction.md
View file

@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Extract stable, versioned normative documents from the exploratory concept
draft so that schemas (WP-0002), legal skeleton (WP-0001), and later Trust
Service work share one frozen vocabulary.
**Authority chain:** `spec/TargetRevenueLicenseConcept.md` remains the
**Authority chain:** `specs/TargetRevenueLicenseConcept.md` remains the
concept source. Extracted docs under `specs/` become the day-to-day
normative references for implementers; they must not invent divergent
meanings for core terms (PRD §6.1). Working defaults that affect required
@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ Updated `schemas/ledger_entry.schema.json`, `src/target_revenue/fold.py`,
`specs/TargetLedgerSpecification.md` §2/§6, `specs/TechnicalSpecificationDocument.md`
§3.2, and `specs/ProductRequirementsDocument.md` FR-5. Added dedicated test
coverage (`tests/test_ledger_fold.py`) for both new types plus a regression
test confirming the old unsplit type name is now rejected. `spec/TargetRevenueLicenseConcept.md`
test confirming the old unsplit type name is now rejected. `specs/TargetRevenueLicenseConcept.md`
§17 was left unedited — its entry-type list is explicitly non-exhaustive
("may include"), so the split specializes rather than contradicts it.
@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ accept):
`product-ideation` and `general-consulting` as not yet fixture-backed.
- [ ] Cross-links (T05) — confirm PRD §6.1/§6.2, TSD §0/§1.1, README, and
CONTRIBUTING.md all point at the new extracts without contradicting
`spec/TargetRevenueLicenseConcept.md` as ultimate authority.
`specs/TargetRevenueLicenseConcept.md` as ultimate authority.
- [ ] No open question (concept §24) is answered by omission — each extract
either cites a working default explicitly or states the item remains
open.