From 65568132d934978da3faba6cc208fb64282b188b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: tegwick Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 20:22:01 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Accept WP-0003-T06: normative extract review complete MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Bernd reviewed all four extracts (TargetRevenueFrameworkCore.md, PhaseManifestSpecification.md, TargetLedgerSpecification.md, MonetizationExtensionSpecification.md) plus cross-links and open-question coverage. Six-item checklist complete: one real fix (§1.11's extension- redefinition list had drifted broader than concept §7.11's closed list), one polish pass (PRD/CONTRIBUTING cross-link symmetry), four items confirmed with no changes needed. Marks WP-0003-T06 done and the WP-0003 workplan finished (all 6 tasks complete). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 --- workplans/TREV-WP-0003-normative-core-extraction.md | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/workplans/TREV-WP-0003-normative-core-extraction.md b/workplans/TREV-WP-0003-normative-core-extraction.md index acbf219..d1dfa7f 100644 --- a/workplans/TREV-WP-0003-normative-core-extraction.md +++ b/workplans/TREV-WP-0003-normative-core-extraction.md @@ -4,11 +4,11 @@ type: workplan title: "Normative core extraction (PRD Phase 1)" domain: infotech repo: target-revenue -status: active +status: finished owner: claude topic_slug: infotech created: "2026-07-28" -updated: "2026-07-28" +updated: "2026-07-29" state_hub_workstream_id: "26d0f7ff-7e53-4729-a12e-5d526a843949" --- @@ -170,9 +170,11 @@ Updated CONTRIBUTING.md terminology and human-gate sections. Confirmed via ```task id: TREV-WP-0003-T06 -status: todo +status: done priority: high human_accept_required: true +human_accepted_by: Bernd +human_accepted_at: "2026-07-29" state_hub_task_id: "b2ef367b-7c09-4bd7-b0e7-d9deee02000a" ``` @@ -243,9 +245,9 @@ accept): Terminology section, which previously named only `TargetRevenueFrameworkCore.md` — now symmetric with README's full four-document table. -- [ ] No open question (concept §24) is answered by omission — each extract +- [x] No open question (concept §24) is answered by omission — each extract either cites a working default explicitly or states the item remains - open. + open. **Reviewed and accepted 2026-07-29, no fix needed.** Once accepted, update this task's `status` to `done` and record `human_accepted_by` / `human_accepted_at`, following the ADR-0001 /