coulomb/target-revenue
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Complete WP-0012-T05: Phase provenance spec addendum draft

Browse source 
specs/PhaseProvenanceSpecAddendum.md synthesizes T02-T04's accepted
decisions into one reviewable document: the phase_manifest schema diff
(repo_hub/repo_hub_uri/repo_id/repo_name, base_phase_id), the
specs/policies/ + specs/profiles/ extraction with concrete file lists
and frontmatter shapes, the ledger UI change, a forgejo_hubs migration
sketch for the hosted hub registry, the three-example-manifest backfill
plan, and a suggested implementation task breakdown.

This is a proposal only, not yet accepted for implementation -- per
the maintainer's own established sequencing, this is the document to
discuss before any of it is filed as its own workplan. All five
WP-0012 tasks are done; workplan marked finished.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-08-03 20:16:29 +02:00
parent 8aa04a1f05
commit 694b280a7e
3 changed files with 280 additions and 5 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

18
workplans/TREV-WP-0012-phase-provenance-and-policy-modeling.md
View file

@ -4,11 +4,11 @@ type: workplan
title: "Phase provenance, ledger reference, and degeneration-policy modeling"
domain: infotech
repo: target-revenue
status: active
status: finished
owner: claude
topic_slug: infotech
created: "2026-07-30"
updated: "2026-07-30"
updated: "2026-08-03"
state_hub_workstream_id: "763a31ee-85fe-43d0-9040-1e6fd432601c"
---
@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ All four T02–T04 decisions now feed T05's spec addendum draft.
```task
id: TREV-WP-0012-T05
status: todo
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "152b54a6-08a9-4ced-a5f6-d5638d102900"
```
@ -302,7 +302,17 @@ task; it produces a reviewable document only. Once accepted, file the
implementation work as its own workplan(s), consistent with how WP-0009
and WP-0010 were split from a single combined plan.
## Related gaps spun out as their own workplans
**Result:** `specs/PhaseProvenanceSpecAddendum.md` written — six
sections covering the schema diff (§1), the `specs/policies/`/
`specs/profiles/` extraction with concrete file lists and frontmatter
shapes (§2), the ledger UI change (§3), a new `forgejo_hubs` migration
sketch for the hub-registry decision from T02 (§4), the backfill plan
for the three example manifests (§5), and a suggested implementation
task breakdown (§6) for whatever workplan follows once this addendum is
reviewed. **Not yet accepted** — this is the document to discuss before
any implementation work is filed or started. All five WP-0012 tasks are
now done; this workplan is finished pending that discussion, which
happens outside this workplan's own task list.
Use cases 4, 6, and 7 above are bigger than a modeling exercise — they
are missing implementation, not missing documentation — and are tracked