Implement Control Plane backend: rights enforcement + audit log (WP-0009-T03)
migrations/0006_control_plane.sql: control_plane_audit_log (append-only, no UPDATE/DELETE for trf_app) and control_plane_proposed_entries (the Contributor tier's "propose, don't append" workflow from concept §2) - review decisions go through a review_proposed_entry() SECURITY DEFINER function, same governance-action pattern as set_extension_status/revoke_credential, not a direct UPDATE. src/target_revenue/control_plane.py is the enforcement layer concept §2 called for: register_phase/append_development_credit require Operator+; propose_ledger_entry requires Contributor+ and stores a pending proposal without touching the real Ledger; approve_proposed_entry (Operator+) appends it under the *reviewer's own* credential/attribution (not the original proposer's - the reviewer is who's authorizing it into the real Ledger, while the proposer stays on record in the proposal row and audit log); reject_proposed_entry (Operator+) discards it. issue_/ revoke_user_credential (Admin+) wrap registry.py's T02 functions with the same rights check and audit logging. Every action funnels through record_audit_event, independent of the Trust Service's own signed records. tests/test_control_plane.py (12 tests): rights enforcement at each tier boundary, the full propose -> approve -> appended-under-reviewer flow, propose -> reject -> nothing appended, double-review rejection, audit log content/attribution, DB-level UPDATE rejection on both new tables. Full suite: 84 offline (unchanged), 53 with Docker (up from 41); no stray containers left running.
This commit is contained in:
parent
d29447fcff
commit
885da0a1cb
6 changed files with 756 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ The concept's §13 now defines a **Global Contingency Share Determination Rule**
|
|||
| [TREV-WP-0006](workplans/TREV-WP-0006-trust-service-implementation.md) | Hosted Trust Service reference implementation (PRD Phase 4b) — **finished**, all 9 tasks done (Postgres-backed registries/ledger/metrics/attestation/breach-record, ADR-0002 accepted, onboarding CLI, hosted conformance suite) |
|
||||
| [TREV-WP-0007](workplans/TREV-WP-0007-degeneration-policy-and-canonical-profiles.md) | Degeneration policy + canonical monetization profile catalog — **finished**, all 4 tasks done. `trsl:policy:linear-longstop-v0` confirmed 2026-07-29 as the v1 norm for the first pilot cohort; `progress-paused-longstop-v1` named as the next iteration, not yet adopted |
|
||||
| [TREV-WP-0008](workplans/TREV-WP-0008-governance-and-pilot-rollout.md) | Governance formalization + pilot rollout — active; T01–T04 done. `info-tech-canon` dry-run onboarding routine exercised end-to-end 2026-07-29. **Org-wide TRSL license adoption executed 2026-07-30** across ~90 `coulomb`-org repos (`history/260730-TRSL-OrgWideLicenseRollout.md`) — a license-text adoption, not a Phase declaration. T05 (real Phase go-live gate) remains `todo` by design; no Phase exists yet for any repo |
|
||||
| [TREV-WP-0009](workplans/TREV-WP-0009-target-revenue-control-plane.md) | Target Revenue Control Plane — interactive UI for the `binky` tenant, incl. interactive Development Credit entry creation (`specs/TargetRevenueControlPlaneConcept.md`) — active; T01 (rights model) and **T02 (WP-0006 auth extension for per-human sub-credentials, `migrations/0005_licensor_credentials.sql`) done**; T03 (Control Plane backend) next |
|
||||
| [TREV-WP-0009](workplans/TREV-WP-0009-target-revenue-control-plane.md) | Target Revenue Control Plane — interactive UI for the `binky` tenant, incl. interactive Development Credit entry creation (`specs/TargetRevenueControlPlaneConcept.md`) — active; T01, T02, and **T03 (backend rights enforcement + audit log + propose/review workflow, `src/target_revenue/control_plane.py`) done**; T04 (interactive UI) next |
|
||||
| [TREV-WP-0010](workplans/TREV-WP-0010-development-effort-calculator.md) | Development Effort Calculator — **finished**, all 3 tasks done. Applied to the three real pilot candidates (`history/260730-EffortCalculator-CandidateApplication.md`) — every calculator-derived Initial Target came out materially lower than the earlier hand-picked placeholders, two of three carrying explicit warnings recommending manual review |
|
||||
|
||||
Hub index: [`WORK-RECORDS.md`](WORK-RECORDS.md) · brief: [`.custodian-brief.md`](.custodian-brief.md)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue