Close WP-0004/WP-0005 with alpha/beta legal-review deferral

Maintainer decision (2026-07-29): full specialist legal review of the
TRSL/CUA is postponed until the framework moves out of beta, given
limited legal/commercial exposure during build/alpha. WP-0004-T10 and
WP-0005-T10 synthesize their jurisdiction research into adopted alpha/beta
working defaults (governing law -> arbitration at a neutral seat,
liability cap, data protection minimal-collection practice, and the
Enforcement Network's fee mechanics) rather than full resolution, and are
accepted on that basis. Propagates the decision to the License/CUA V1C1
Appendix A tables and status banners, SCOPE.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, the
WP-0008-T05 go-live gate, and README.md.
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-07-29 20:46:49 +02:00
parent 4d2e1e5153
commit d07c77f40a
11 changed files with 190 additions and 30 deletions

View file

@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ type: workplan
title: "Global jurisdictional research for TRSL and Commercial Use Agreement"
domain: infotech
repo: target-revenue
status: active
status: finished
owner: claude
topic_slug: infotech
created: "2026-07-29"
@ -339,12 +339,29 @@ should ordinarily share a governing law).
```task
id: TREV-WP-0004-T10
status: todo
status: done
priority: high
human_accept_required: true
human_accepted_by: Bernd
human_accepted_at: "2026-07-29"
state_hub_task_id: "b6a81a88-a9a2-4012-ba69-9f650381b003"
```
**Result:** Synthesis produced at `history/260729-TRSL-Jurisdiction-Synthesis.md`.
Human acceptance (Bernd, 2026-07-29): the maintainer decided full specialist
legal review is postponed until the framework moves out of beta, given
limited legal/commercial exposure during build/alpha and the expectation
that the License/CUA will be revised on stakeholder/customer feedback before
the legal framework settles. On that basis, the synthesis's proposed
alpha/beta working defaults are adopted and applied to both V1C1 documents'
Appendix A tables and status banners: License Appendix A item 6 and CUA
Appendix A item 1 (governing law → arbitration at a neutral seat), CUA item 3
(liability cap → kept, drafted prominently/proportionately), and CUA item 5
(data protection → minimal-collection practice, no DPA drafted yet). CUA item
4 (indemnification) is deliberately left unresolved, per the synthesis's own
reasoning that this is the correct default, not a gap. This closes this
workplan without claiming the legal framework is final.
Using T01–T09, produce a consolidated jurisdictional risk matrix (one row
per jurisdiction/family, columns for: standard-terms clarity regime,
liability-cap enforceability, indemnification norms, data-protection