coulomb/target-revenue
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Close WP-0004/WP-0005 with alpha/beta legal-review deferral

Browse source 
Maintainer decision (2026-07-29): full specialist legal review of the
TRSL/CUA is postponed until the framework moves out of beta, given
limited legal/commercial exposure during build/alpha. WP-0004-T10 and
WP-0005-T10 synthesize their jurisdiction research into adopted alpha/beta
working defaults (governing law -> arbitration at a neutral seat,
liability cap, data protection minimal-collection practice, and the
Enforcement Network's fee mechanics) rather than full resolution, and are
accepted on that basis. Propagates the decision to the License/CUA V1C1
Appendix A tables and status banners, SCOPE.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, the
WP-0008-T05 go-live gate, and README.md.
This commit is contained in:
tegwick 2026-07-29 20:46:49 +02:00
parent 4d2e1e5153
commit d07c77f40a
11 changed files with 190 additions and 30 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

20
workplans/TREV-WP-0005-enforcement-network-research.md
View file

@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ type: workplan
title: "Enforcement Network — legal feasibility and design research"
domain: infotech
repo: target-revenue
status: active
status: finished
owner: claude
topic_slug: infotech
created: "2026-07-29"
@ -318,12 +318,28 @@ legal decisions (concept §3.2, §10).
```task
id: TREV-WP-0005-T10
status: todo
status: done
priority: high
human_accept_required: true
human_accepted_by: Bernd
human_accepted_at: "2026-07-29"
state_hub_task_id: "cdd3ca93-2ec0-4326-959b-2c88de11b41b"
```
**Result:** Synthesis produced at `history/260729-TREN-Synthesis.md`.
Human acceptance (Bernd, 2026-07-29): same alpha/beta risk-acceptance basis
as `TREV-WP-0004-T10` (see that task's Result). The synthesis's five
proposed resolutions to `specs/EnforcementNetworkConcept.md` §13.5 are
adopted and applied: funding source (Licensor direct), FX methodology
(announcement-date rate), reimbursement of advanced financing from Recovery
before Development Credit, the 18-month trailing look-back window, and
tier-3 split-role collapse to a single non-contingent Local Counsel
engagement by default. §13.2's Jurisdiction Percentage Cap table (12
jurisdictions/families) is applied as the authoritative reference. Japan's
Article 12 fee-splitting risk is explicitly **not** resolved by this
acceptance and remains flagged — no Enforcement Action should be pursued in
Japan without specific counsel review, even during alpha/beta.
Using T01–T09, produce a consolidated feasibility matrix (one row per
jurisdiction/family: direct lawyer contingency permitted? statutory cap?
litigation funding regulatory status? recommended structural variant) and