Set up practical implementation workplans (WP-0006/0007/0008)
With WP-0001/0002/0003 finished, PRD Phase 4b (hosted Trust Service) is unblocked per SCOPE.md's own sequencing rule, and the midterm goal shifts from framework design to practical application: governing and monetizing repos across the coulomb Forgejo org's product lines (coulomb-loop, net-kingdom, helix-forge, the railiance-* family). - TREV-WP-0006: Trust Service reference implementation (PRD Phase 4b). Eight tasks from PRD to conformance-tested hosted service, explicit that it builds infrastructure only - no real payments or Phase tracking. - TREV-WP-0007: Degeneration policy finalization (PRD Phase 5) and the full canonical monetization profile catalog (remainder of Phase 3) - pilot Phases can't responsibly launch on the placeholder pilot policy and one-line profile defaults alone. - TREV-WP-0008: Governance formalization (PRD Phase 7) and pilot rollout preparation. Forces a real design decision the framework never had to answer while single-repo-hypothetical: who is "the Licensor" across four independent product lines. Produces draft, non-binding Phase Manifests as worked examples for one repo per product line, and a CLA draft. All three explicitly preserve SCOPE.md's existing "no production Phases until legal review" guardrail rather than overriding it under pressure to monetize real repos: WP-0008-T05 is a dedicated, human-gated go-live decision, and no other task in any of the three workplans is permitted to authorize a real Phase, real Commercial Entitlement sale, or real Development Credit tracking. Updates SCOPE.md (new Stage 0/Stage 1 maturity table, revised out-of-scope table distinguishing "infrastructure in scope" from "going live still gated"), PRD roadmap (Phase 4b/5/7 now active, pointing at the new workplans), and README's active-work table accordingly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
cdfdd7f6b3
commit
dd7f7d2181
6 changed files with 442 additions and 27 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
id: TREV-WP-0007
|
||||
type: workplan
|
||||
title: "Degeneration policy research and canonical monetization profiles"
|
||||
domain: infotech
|
||||
repo: target-revenue
|
||||
status: active
|
||||
owner: claude
|
||||
topic_slug: infotech
|
||||
created: "2026-07-29"
|
||||
updated: "2026-07-29"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Degeneration policy research and canonical monetization profiles
|
||||
|
||||
Finalizes two PRD deliverables that pilot Phases (`workplans/TREV-WP-0008-governance-and-pilot-rollout.md`)
|
||||
cannot responsibly launch without: a degeneration policy beyond the
|
||||
placeholder `trsl:policy:linear-longstop-v0`, and a full worked canonical
|
||||
monetization profile catalog beyond the six one-line defaults already in
|
||||
`specs/MonetizationExtensionSpecification.md` §5.
|
||||
|
||||
**Why this blocks pilot rollout:** every Phase Manifest requires a
|
||||
`degeneration_policy` reference (`specs/PhaseManifestSpecification.md`,
|
||||
Required field) and, in practice, at least one Monetization Extension.
|
||||
Launching real pilot Phases on an admittedly-provisional pilot policy and
|
||||
one-line profile defaults is a real business decision, not a technical
|
||||
blocker — but it should be a *chosen* risk, not an accidental one because
|
||||
this workplan was skipped.
|
||||
|
||||
## Degeneration policy research
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: TREV-WP-0007-T01
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Produce `specs/TargetDegenerationPolicyResearch.md`: survey comparative
|
||||
models (BSL/FSL-style fixed longstop vs. progress-sensitive decay vs.
|
||||
hybrid — `history/260729-TRSL-PriorArt-Survey.md` already has partial
|
||||
groundwork), and resolve concept §13.2's open inputs (progress-sensitive
|
||||
pause on material Development Credit, contributor diversity factors) that
|
||||
`trsl:policy:linear-longstop-v0` deliberately left unresolved per
|
||||
`specs/OpenQuestions-WorkingDefaults.md` Q7.
|
||||
|
||||
## Degeneration formula decision (human gate)
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: TREV-WP-0007-T02
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
human_accept_required: true
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Using T01, propose either: (a) confirming `linear-longstop-v0` as the
|
||||
adopted v1 formula (not merely a Stage 0 pilot default), or (b) a
|
||||
refined/replacement formula. Either way this promotes a working default to
|
||||
permanent-enough-to-launch-pilots-on status, which per `SCOPE.md` §4
|
||||
requires explicit human accept — agents may prepare the recommendation and
|
||||
leave this `todo`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Canonical monetization profile catalog
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: TREV-WP-0007-T03
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Produce `specs/CanonicalMonetizationProfiles.md`: full worked pricing
|
||||
narratives and examples for the six canonical-candidate profiles already
|
||||
named in `specs/MonetizationExtensionSpecification.md` §5
|
||||
(`development-license`, `cost-plus-operations`, `phase-sponsorship`,
|
||||
`service-with-development-allocation`, `product-ideation`,
|
||||
`general-consulting`), plus fixture files for the two not yet
|
||||
fixture-backed (`product-ideation`, `general-consulting`), following the
|
||||
pattern already established in `examples/phase-001/extensions/`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Canonicalization review process (light)
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: TREV-WP-0007-T04
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Per `specs/MonetizationExtensionSpecification.md` §4, promoting an
|
||||
extension from `registered` to `canonical` "is a documented human/
|
||||
governance action, never automated" — but no document yet describes what
|
||||
that review actually checks. Produce a short (not a full governance
|
||||
framework — that's `workplans/TREV-WP-0008-governance-and-pilot-rollout.md`
|
||||
T01) checklist for canonicalizing the six profiles in this workplan,
|
||||
sufficient to promote them from `registered` to `canonical` status.
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue