# Pilot candidate Phase Manifests These manifests began as **draft, non-binding worked examples** (`workplans/TREV-WP-0008-governance-and-pilot-rollout.md` T03). They keep a `draft-` phase id prefix so they are never confused with a declared Phase. **Go-live 2026-08-05:** T05 accepted the first **real** Phase for `info-tech-canon` — the authoritative declaration lives in that repo at `trf/phase-service-surface.json` as `trsl:phase:info-tech-canon-service-surface` (not the draft file here). Full record: `history/260805-T05-GoLive-info-tech-canon.md`. The draft directories below remain as historical worked examples for candidates that are **not** yet declared: - **No Commercial Entitlement is for sale under the draft manifests.** - **`net-kingdom` and `railiance-vergabe-teilnahme` drafts are still not declared** — T05 authorized only the info-tech-canon Phase. | Directory | Product line | Candidate deliverable | Indicative Target Multiple | |---|---|---|---| | `net-kingdom-local-identity/` | `net-kingdom` | `NK-WP-0002` Local Identity | Incremental (10x) | | `railiance-vergabe-teilnahme/` | `railiance-*` (`railiance-apps`) | `vergabe-teilnahme` (`RAILIANCE-WP-0002`/`-0014`) | Product-defining (100x) | | `info-tech-canon-service-surface/` | `info-tech-canon` | Cumulative service surface, `ITC-WP-0001`–`ITC-WP-0012` | Product-defining (100x) | **`target_basis`/`initial_target` figures (updated 2026-07-30):** all three now use `target_revenue.effort_calculator`-derived values (`workplans/TREV-WP-0010-development-effort-calculator.md` T03), not the originally hand-picked illustrative placeholders. Full derivation, warnings, and the judgment calls involved (date-scoping, and which of two repos to measure for `railiance-vergabe-teilnahme`) are in `history/260730-EffortCalculator-CandidateApplication.md`. Two of the three carry explicit calculator warnings recommending a manual override before any real use — these are still draft, non-binding figures, not a settled costing proposal. See `specs/PilotPhaseCandidateSurvey.md` for the underlying candidate rationale (unaffected by this figure update).