target-revenue/specs
tegwick 74ec1622bf New concept: Enforcement Network (contingency-incentivized violation enforcement)
Introduces specs/EnforcementNetworkConcept.md: independent, locally-licensed
Enforcement Partners pursue unauthorized Commercial Use (License §3
violations) in their home jurisdiction for a Contingency Share of Recovery,
so enforcement scales the way the framework's monetization already does -
through aligned incentive rather than central litigation capacity. New
terminology (Alleged Violation, Enforcement Action, Recovery, Contingency
Share, Platform Share, Enforcement Registry, Enforcement Partner Agreement)
plus a proposed enforcement-recovery Monetization Extension so Recovery
flows into Development Credit through the existing accounting model rather
than a parallel bucket.

Flags the mechanism's central risk up front rather than assuming it away:
lawyer contingency fees are not legal everywhere. Backed by
workplans/TREV-WP-0005-enforcement-network-research.md (10 tasks); four
executed this session with live web research:

- Germany/EU: RVG §4a permits contingency fees only in three narrow gates,
  none fitting this fact pattern well - single-role Enforcement Partner is
  very likely not viable; France permits a fixed-fee-plus-uncapped-result-
  fee structure instead; EU litigation-funding regulation is proposed
  (2022 EP resolution) but not yet adopted.
- US: contingency fees broadly permitted; practical precondition is timely
  copyright registration of the Milestone Release to unlock statutory
  damages/fee-shifting; Copyright Claims Board flagged as a lower-cost venue.
- UK: Damages-Based Agreements cap fees at 50% for this case category -
  the concept's originally-proposed 50% Contingency Share lands exactly on
  this real statutory ceiling, the first jurisdiction where the figure is
  precisely validated rather than arbitrary.
- Mechanism design: synthesizes the above into a single Enforcement Partner
  Agreement template with jurisdiction-conditional role structure
  (single-role vs. Litigation Funder/Local Counsel split), with a payment-
  flow diagram showing the Development Credit allocation is unaffected by
  which structure applies.

Six of ten WP-0005 tasks remain open (Argentina, India, China, Africa,
Asia-Pacific, and the human-gated synthesis). Cross-referenced from README.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-29 15:21:19 +02:00
..
EnforcementNetworkConcept.md New concept: Enforcement Network (contingency-incentivized violation enforcement) 2026-07-29 15:21:19 +02:00
MonetizationExtensionSpecification.md Merge spec/ into specs/: one specs directory for the whole repo 2026-07-29 10:22:14 +02:00
OpenQuestions-WorkingDefaults.md Route breach-record naming policy through Commercial Use Agreement, not License 2026-07-29 11:03:39 +02:00
PhaseManifestSpecification.md Merge spec/ into specs/: one specs directory for the whole repo 2026-07-29 10:22:14 +02:00
ProductRequirementsDocument.md Draft Commercial Use Agreement V1C1 template 2026-07-29 12:48:23 +02:00
TargetLedgerSpecification.md Merge spec/ into specs/: one specs directory for the whole repo 2026-07-29 10:22:14 +02:00
TargetRevenueCommercialUseAgreement-V1C1.md Create TREV-WP-0004: global jurisdictional research plan 2026-07-29 14:47:26 +02:00
TargetRevenueFrameworkCore.md Merge spec/ into specs/: one specs directory for the whole repo 2026-07-29 10:22:14 +02:00
TargetRevenueLicenseConcept.md Merge spec/ into specs/: one specs directory for the whole repo 2026-07-29 10:22:14 +02:00
TargetRevenueSourceLicense-V1C1.md Create TREV-WP-0004: global jurisdictional research plan 2026-07-29 14:47:26 +02:00
TechnicalSpecificationDocument.md Draft Commercial Use Agreement V1C1 template 2026-07-29 12:48:23 +02:00