Finish TEN-WP-0006-T02: implement guardrail domain model
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0d1435c2d2
commit
33ceb882ee
6 changed files with 868 additions and 1 deletions
49
src/tenant_engine/guardrail/__init__.py
Normal file
49
src/tenant_engine/guardrail/__init__.py
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
|
|||
"""Guardrail and quota policy (TEN-WP-0006).
|
||||
|
||||
The namespace `.claude/rules/architecture.md` reserved from the start. Pure
|
||||
domain: frozen dataclasses, typed errors, and resolution as a side-effect-free
|
||||
function. No framework dependency, no store, no I/O.
|
||||
|
||||
`tenant-engine` owns the *ceiling*. It does not meter, bill, or decide --
|
||||
`flex-auth` joins these limits with consumption to reach a decision. See
|
||||
`docs/tenant-guardrail-policy.md`.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from tenant_engine.guardrail.model import (
|
||||
UNLIMITED,
|
||||
ConflictingLimitError,
|
||||
EffectiveLimit,
|
||||
GuardrailChange,
|
||||
InvalidLimitError,
|
||||
LimitKind,
|
||||
LimitValue,
|
||||
Provenance,
|
||||
Unlimited,
|
||||
)
|
||||
from tenant_engine.guardrail.registry import (
|
||||
DEFAULT_REGISTRY,
|
||||
GuardrailRegistryInvalidError,
|
||||
LimitDefinition,
|
||||
LimitRegistry,
|
||||
UnknownLimitKeyError,
|
||||
)
|
||||
from tenant_engine.guardrail.resolution import resolve_limit, resolve_limits
|
||||
|
||||
__all__ = [
|
||||
"DEFAULT_REGISTRY",
|
||||
"UNLIMITED",
|
||||
"ConflictingLimitError",
|
||||
"EffectiveLimit",
|
||||
"GuardrailChange",
|
||||
"GuardrailRegistryInvalidError",
|
||||
"InvalidLimitError",
|
||||
"LimitDefinition",
|
||||
"LimitKind",
|
||||
"LimitRegistry",
|
||||
"LimitValue",
|
||||
"Provenance",
|
||||
"Unlimited",
|
||||
"UnknownLimitKeyError",
|
||||
"resolve_limit",
|
||||
"resolve_limits",
|
||||
]
|
||||
182
src/tenant_engine/guardrail/model.py
Normal file
182
src/tenant_engine/guardrail/model.py
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
|
|||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
from dataclasses import dataclass
|
||||
from datetime import datetime
|
||||
from enum import Enum
|
||||
from typing import Final, Union
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class InvalidLimitError(ValueError):
|
||||
"""A limit value violates a domain invariant."""
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class ConflictingLimitError(ValueError):
|
||||
"""Two limits for the same key disagree on kind, period, or currency."""
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class LimitKind(str, Enum):
|
||||
"""What a limit counts.
|
||||
|
||||
Rate limiting is deliberately absent: a per-second traffic ceiling is a
|
||||
gateway concern with different latency and storage characteristics.
|
||||
ACTION_COUNT is a business-period quota, not a traffic shaper.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
SPEND = "spend"
|
||||
ENTITY_COUNT = "entity_count"
|
||||
ACTION_COUNT = "action_count"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class Provenance(str, Enum):
|
||||
"""Which layer supplied an effective value.
|
||||
|
||||
Returned to consumers so a deliberate enterprise ceiling is
|
||||
distinguishable from a floor that was reached by accident.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
OVERRIDE = "override"
|
||||
PLAN = "plan"
|
||||
GROUPING = "grouping"
|
||||
RESERVED = "reserved"
|
||||
FAIL_CLOSED = "fail_closed"
|
||||
LIFECYCLE = "lifecycle"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
|
||||
class Unlimited:
|
||||
"""An explicit, declared absence of ceiling.
|
||||
|
||||
Four rules, enforced by construction sites rather than by this type: it is
|
||||
never a default, never the result of absence or a parse failure, only ever
|
||||
arrives by explicit declaration, and its assignment is audited. The
|
||||
prohibition in the contract is on *inferring* an open ceiling, not on
|
||||
deliberately choosing one.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
def __repr__(self) -> str: # pragma: no cover - debug aid
|
||||
return "UNLIMITED"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
UNLIMITED: Final = Unlimited()
|
||||
|
||||
Amount = Union[int, Unlimited]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
|
||||
class LimitValue:
|
||||
"""One ceiling.
|
||||
|
||||
Spend amounts are integer minor units plus an ISO-4217 currency, never
|
||||
floats -- a budget compared as a float rounds the wrong way at exactly the
|
||||
boundary where it matters.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
kind: LimitKind
|
||||
amount: Amount
|
||||
currency: str | None = None
|
||||
period: str | None = None
|
||||
|
||||
def __post_init__(self) -> None:
|
||||
if isinstance(self.amount, int) and self.amount < 0:
|
||||
raise InvalidLimitError(f"limit amount must not be negative, got {self.amount}")
|
||||
if isinstance(self.amount, bool):
|
||||
raise InvalidLimitError("limit amount must be an integer, not a bool")
|
||||
|
||||
if self.kind is LimitKind.SPEND:
|
||||
if not self.currency:
|
||||
raise InvalidLimitError("a spend limit requires a currency")
|
||||
if not self.period:
|
||||
raise InvalidLimitError("a spend limit requires a period")
|
||||
elif self.currency is not None:
|
||||
raise InvalidLimitError(f"a {self.kind.value} limit must not carry a currency")
|
||||
|
||||
if self.kind is LimitKind.ENTITY_COUNT and self.period is not None:
|
||||
raise InvalidLimitError("an entity_count limit is a point-in-time cap, not a rate")
|
||||
if self.kind is LimitKind.ACTION_COUNT and not self.period:
|
||||
raise InvalidLimitError("an action_count limit requires a period")
|
||||
|
||||
@property
|
||||
def is_unlimited(self) -> bool:
|
||||
return isinstance(self.amount, Unlimited)
|
||||
|
||||
def compatible_with(self, other: "LimitValue") -> bool:
|
||||
"""Whether two values describe the same ceiling shape.
|
||||
|
||||
Currency is *not* part of compatibility: precedence resolves per key
|
||||
and the highest layer wins outright, so two currencies never combine
|
||||
within one resolution. tenant-engine therefore holds no exchange rate.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
return self.kind is other.kind and self.period == other.period
|
||||
|
||||
def reduced_to_floor(self, floor: "LimitValue") -> "LimitValue":
|
||||
"""Return the more restrictive of self and floor.
|
||||
|
||||
Used by the lifecycle clamp, which may only ever reduce.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if not self.compatible_with(floor):
|
||||
raise ConflictingLimitError(
|
||||
f"cannot clamp a {self.kind.value} limit to a {floor.kind.value} floor"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if self.is_unlimited:
|
||||
return floor
|
||||
if floor.is_unlimited:
|
||||
return self
|
||||
assert isinstance(self.amount, int) and isinstance(floor.amount, int)
|
||||
return self if self.amount <= floor.amount else floor
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
|
||||
class EffectiveLimit:
|
||||
"""A resolved ceiling plus the layer it came from."""
|
||||
|
||||
key: str
|
||||
value: LimitValue
|
||||
provenance: Provenance
|
||||
|
||||
@property
|
||||
def is_fail_closed(self) -> bool:
|
||||
"""True when this value came from the floor rather than from policy.
|
||||
|
||||
Surfaced rather than hidden: a `fail_closed` provenance means the
|
||||
registry is internally inconsistent, and a consumer should be able to
|
||||
tell that apart from a deliberate zero.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
return self.provenance is Provenance.FAIL_CLOSED
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
|
||||
class GuardrailChange:
|
||||
"""An audited guardrail mutation.
|
||||
|
||||
A limit change is a privilege change, so it is append-only and carries the
|
||||
same evidence a `RoleGrant` does -- actor, reason, correlation id. "Who
|
||||
raised this tenant's ceiling, when, and why" must stay answerable.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
change_id: str
|
||||
tenant_id: str
|
||||
limit_key: str
|
||||
previous: LimitValue | None
|
||||
current: LimitValue | None
|
||||
changed_by: str
|
||||
reason: str
|
||||
correlation_id: str
|
||||
changed_at: datetime
|
||||
|
||||
def __post_init__(self) -> None:
|
||||
if self.previous is None and self.current is None:
|
||||
raise InvalidLimitError("a guardrail change must set or clear a limit")
|
||||
if self.previous is not None and self.current is not None:
|
||||
if not self.previous.compatible_with(self.current):
|
||||
raise ConflictingLimitError(
|
||||
f"guardrail change for {self.limit_key!r} changes the limit shape"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if self.previous == self.current:
|
||||
raise InvalidLimitError("guardrail change would not change the limit")
|
||||
if not self.reason.strip():
|
||||
raise InvalidLimitError("a guardrail change requires a reason")
|
||||
|
||||
@property
|
||||
def is_clear(self) -> bool:
|
||||
"""Whether this change removed a per-tenant override."""
|
||||
return self.current is None
|
||||
175
src/tenant_engine/guardrail/registry.py
Normal file
175
src/tenant_engine/guardrail/registry.py
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
|
|||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
from dataclasses import dataclass
|
||||
from types import MappingProxyType
|
||||
from typing import Mapping
|
||||
|
||||
from tenant_engine.domain import GROUPINGS
|
||||
from tenant_engine.guardrail.model import (
|
||||
UNLIMITED,
|
||||
InvalidLimitError,
|
||||
LimitKind,
|
||||
LimitValue,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class UnknownLimitKeyError(KeyError):
|
||||
"""A limit key is not registered.
|
||||
|
||||
Deliberately an error rather than a zero or an unlimited. Zero would break
|
||||
a caller who merely misspelled a key; unlimited would fail open.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class GuardrailRegistryInvalidError(ValueError):
|
||||
"""A registry does not supply a default for every grouping.
|
||||
|
||||
Raised at construction, so an unmapped grouping cannot reach production.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Key prefixes, by kind. A key must match one of these to be registered.
|
||||
_PREFIXES: Mapping[str, LimitKind] = MappingProxyType(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"spend.": LimitKind.SPEND,
|
||||
"entity.": LimitKind.ENTITY_COUNT,
|
||||
"action.": LimitKind.ACTION_COUNT,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# The deployment's canonical currency for grouping-derived spend defaults.
|
||||
# Plan-derived and override limits carry their own.
|
||||
DEFAULT_CURRENCY = "EUR"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def kind_for_key(key: str) -> LimitKind:
|
||||
for prefix, kind in _PREFIXES.items():
|
||||
if key.startswith(prefix) and len(key) > len(prefix):
|
||||
return kind
|
||||
raise UnknownLimitKeyError(key)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
|
||||
class LimitDefinition:
|
||||
"""One registered limit key: its shape, its floor, and its defaults.
|
||||
|
||||
`owner` names the service that gives the key meaning. tenant-engine stores
|
||||
the ceiling for `entity.workspace` and never learns what a workspace is.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
key: str
|
||||
kind: LimitKind
|
||||
floor: LimitValue
|
||||
grouping_defaults: Mapping[str, LimitValue]
|
||||
reserved_default: LimitValue
|
||||
owner: str
|
||||
period: str | None = None
|
||||
|
||||
def __post_init__(self) -> None:
|
||||
if kind_for_key(self.key) is not self.kind:
|
||||
raise InvalidLimitError(f"key {self.key!r} does not match kind {self.kind.value}")
|
||||
missing = sorted(GROUPINGS - set(self.grouping_defaults))
|
||||
if missing:
|
||||
raise GuardrailRegistryInvalidError(
|
||||
f"{self.key!r} has no default for grouping(s): {', '.join(missing)}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
for value in (self.floor, self.reserved_default, *self.grouping_defaults.values()):
|
||||
if value.kind is not self.kind:
|
||||
raise InvalidLimitError(f"{self.key!r} default has kind {value.kind.value}")
|
||||
if self.floor.is_unlimited:
|
||||
raise GuardrailRegistryInvalidError(
|
||||
f"{self.key!r} floor must be restrictive -- a floor is never unlimited"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class LimitRegistry:
|
||||
"""The set of limit keys that resolve. Immutable once constructed."""
|
||||
|
||||
def __init__(self, definitions: tuple[LimitDefinition, ...]) -> None:
|
||||
by_key: dict[str, LimitDefinition] = {}
|
||||
for definition in definitions:
|
||||
if definition.key in by_key:
|
||||
raise GuardrailRegistryInvalidError(f"duplicate limit key {definition.key!r}")
|
||||
by_key[definition.key] = definition
|
||||
self._by_key = MappingProxyType(by_key)
|
||||
|
||||
def __contains__(self, key: object) -> bool:
|
||||
return key in self._by_key
|
||||
|
||||
def __iter__(self):
|
||||
return iter(self._by_key)
|
||||
|
||||
def __len__(self) -> int:
|
||||
return len(self._by_key)
|
||||
|
||||
@property
|
||||
def keys(self) -> tuple[str, ...]:
|
||||
return tuple(self._by_key)
|
||||
|
||||
def get(self, key: str) -> LimitDefinition:
|
||||
try:
|
||||
return self._by_key[key]
|
||||
except KeyError:
|
||||
raise UnknownLimitKeyError(key) from None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _eur(minor_units: int) -> LimitValue:
|
||||
return LimitValue(
|
||||
kind=LimitKind.SPEND,
|
||||
amount=minor_units,
|
||||
currency=DEFAULT_CURRENCY,
|
||||
period="P1M",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Monthly spend ceilings per ADR-0013 grouping, in minor units of
|
||||
# DEFAULT_CURRENCY. Only `trial` = 0 is canon (ADR-0013); the rest are
|
||||
# conservative opening ceilings chosen so that no grouping starts unbounded,
|
||||
# pending product sign-off. They are guardrails, not prices -- raising one is
|
||||
# an override or a plan-derived limit, both audited.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# `agentic` sits below `small` on purpose: an autonomous agent can exhaust a
|
||||
# budget far faster than a human operator notices, so its ceiling is set for
|
||||
# the blast radius rather than the buying power.
|
||||
_SPEND_MONTHLY_DEFAULTS: Mapping[str, LimitValue] = MappingProxyType(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"trial": _eur(0),
|
||||
"friendly": _eur(0),
|
||||
"consumer": _eur(2_000),
|
||||
"single": _eur(5_000),
|
||||
"family": _eur(5_000),
|
||||
"community": _eur(5_000),
|
||||
"agentic": _eur(10_000),
|
||||
"small": _eur(25_000),
|
||||
"association": _eur(25_000),
|
||||
"medium": _eur(100_000),
|
||||
"large": _eur(500_000),
|
||||
"enterprise": _eur(2_000_000),
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
SPEND_MONTHLY = LimitDefinition(
|
||||
key="spend.monthly",
|
||||
kind=LimitKind.SPEND,
|
||||
period="P1M",
|
||||
floor=_eur(0),
|
||||
grouping_defaults=_SPEND_MONTHLY_DEFAULTS,
|
||||
# Infrastructure identities are not billable spenders: platform cost is
|
||||
# not metered per tenant. Counts are a different story -- see the contract.
|
||||
reserved_default=_eur(0),
|
||||
owner="tenant-engine",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
DEFAULT_REGISTRY = LimitRegistry((SPEND_MONTHLY,))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def unlimited_reserved_default(kind: LimitKind, period: str | None = None) -> LimitValue:
|
||||
"""The reserved-profile value for a count key.
|
||||
|
||||
`tenant:platform` and `tenant:coulomb` operate the platform, so their
|
||||
entity and action ceilings are explicitly open. This is the sentinel's
|
||||
"explicit declaration" rule, not an inference from absence.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if kind is LimitKind.SPEND:
|
||||
raise InvalidLimitError("reserved spend defaults are zero, not unlimited")
|
||||
return LimitValue(kind=kind, amount=UNLIMITED, period=period)
|
||||
99
src/tenant_engine/guardrail/resolution.py
Normal file
99
src/tenant_engine/guardrail/resolution.py
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
|
|||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
from typing import Mapping
|
||||
|
||||
from tenant_engine.domain import Tenant, TenantLifecycle
|
||||
from tenant_engine.guardrail.model import EffectiveLimit, LimitValue, Provenance
|
||||
from tenant_engine.guardrail.registry import DEFAULT_REGISTRY, LimitRegistry
|
||||
|
||||
# Per-key precedence, highest first: override -> plan -> grouping (or the
|
||||
# reserved profile) -> fail-closed floor. Evaluated *per key*, never per set,
|
||||
# so a plan supplying `spend.monthly` does not wipe out a grouping-derived
|
||||
# `entity.*`.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def resolve_limit(
|
||||
key: str,
|
||||
*,
|
||||
tenant: Tenant,
|
||||
plan_limits: Mapping[str, LimitValue] | None = None,
|
||||
overrides: Mapping[str, LimitValue] | None = None,
|
||||
registry: LimitRegistry = DEFAULT_REGISTRY,
|
||||
) -> EffectiveLimit:
|
||||
"""Resolve one limit key for one tenant. Total and side-effect-free.
|
||||
|
||||
Raises `UnknownLimitKeyError` for an unregistered key -- neither zero nor
|
||||
unlimited, both of which would be lies.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
definition = registry.get(key)
|
||||
|
||||
override = (overrides or {}).get(key)
|
||||
if override is not None:
|
||||
return _clamp(EffectiveLimit(key, override, Provenance.OVERRIDE), tenant, definition.floor)
|
||||
|
||||
plan_limit = (plan_limits or {}).get(key)
|
||||
if plan_limit is not None:
|
||||
return _clamp(EffectiveLimit(key, plan_limit, Provenance.PLAN), tenant, definition.floor)
|
||||
|
||||
if tenant.is_reserved:
|
||||
# Reserved identifiers are ungrouped, so layer 3 cannot apply. They do
|
||||
# not fall through to the floor either: that would clamp the platform's
|
||||
# own identity to zero and take the platform down with it.
|
||||
return _clamp(
|
||||
EffectiveLimit(key, definition.reserved_default, Provenance.RESERVED),
|
||||
tenant,
|
||||
definition.floor,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
grouping_default = definition.grouping_defaults.get(tenant.grouping or "")
|
||||
if grouping_default is not None:
|
||||
return _clamp(
|
||||
EffectiveLimit(key, grouping_default, Provenance.GROUPING), tenant, definition.floor
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Only reachable if the registry is internally inconsistent -- a grouping
|
||||
# added to GROUPINGS with no default declared. The registry validates this
|
||||
# at construction, so this is the second line of defence, not the first.
|
||||
# Provenance stays `fail_closed` so the condition is visible in a read
|
||||
# rather than mistaken for deliberate policy.
|
||||
return _clamp(
|
||||
EffectiveLimit(key, definition.floor, Provenance.FAIL_CLOSED), tenant, definition.floor
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def resolve_limits(
|
||||
*,
|
||||
tenant: Tenant,
|
||||
plan_limits: Mapping[str, LimitValue] | None = None,
|
||||
overrides: Mapping[str, LimitValue] | None = None,
|
||||
registry: LimitRegistry = DEFAULT_REGISTRY,
|
||||
) -> dict[str, EffectiveLimit]:
|
||||
"""Resolve every registered key. Every tenant resolves to exactly one
|
||||
effective value per key -- there is no "unset means unlimited".
|
||||
"""
|
||||
return {
|
||||
key: resolve_limit(
|
||||
key,
|
||||
tenant=tenant,
|
||||
plan_limits=plan_limits,
|
||||
overrides=overrides,
|
||||
registry=registry,
|
||||
)
|
||||
for key in registry.keys
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _clamp(effective: EffectiveLimit, tenant: Tenant, floor: LimitValue) -> EffectiveLimit:
|
||||
"""Apply the lifecycle clamp. Applied after precedence, and may only reduce.
|
||||
|
||||
Follows the TEN-WP-0005 precedent: operations that only reduce privilege
|
||||
stay available while retired, loosening ones do not. A retired tenant's
|
||||
guardrails stay readable -- it is the values that clamp, not the endpoint.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if tenant.lifecycle is TenantLifecycle.ACTIVE:
|
||||
return effective
|
||||
|
||||
clamped = effective.value.reduced_to_floor(floor)
|
||||
if clamped == effective.value:
|
||||
return effective
|
||||
return EffectiveLimit(effective.key, clamped, Provenance.LIFECYCLE)
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue