# tenant-engine production deployment Manifests recovered from the live objects' `kubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration` on 2026-08-14 so that a rollback does not depend on a cluster annotation. Applied originally during TEN-WP-0004; TEN-WP-0005 keeps them in-repo and pins by digest. | File | Deployment | Service DNS | | --- | --- | --- | | `tenant-engine.yaml` | `tenant-engine` | `tenant-engine.tenant-engine.svc.cluster.local:8090` | The file is a five-document manifest: `Namespace`, `PersistentVolumeClaim`, `Deployment`, `Service`, and a least-privilege `NetworkPolicy`. Ingress is restricted to the `user-engine` workload; egress is restricted to `flex-auth-tenant-engine` on 8080 plus cluster DNS. ## Rolling out an image **Do not build images on a workstation.** `.forgejo/workflows/image.yaml` builds from a pushed forge commit on the `container-build` runner. ```bash # 1. Push the commit you intend to ship; CI builds :latest and :main- git push origin main # 2. Take the immutable digest from the workflow's "Report immutable digest" # step -- deploy by digest, never by tag # 3. Edit the image digest in deploy/tenant-engine.yaml, then apply kubectl apply -f deploy/tenant-engine.yaml kubectl -n tenant-engine rollout status deploy/tenant-engine --timeout=120s ``` The Deployment uses `Recreate` because the SQLite PVC is `ReadWriteOnce`. A new pod applies the forward-only lifecycle migration on startup against the existing database. ## Detecting pin drift ```bash KUBECONFIG=~/.kube/config-railiance01 make verify-pin ``` Exit 0 in sync, 1 on drift, 2 if it could not tell. Run it after any rollout, and periodically — drift is not an event you get told about. It compares four things that are supposed to agree: 1. the digest this repo intends to run (`deploy/tenant-engine.yaml`); 2. the digest the Deployment's spec asks for; 3. the digest the **running pod** actually resolved — a spec can be correct while the pod answering traffic is an older ReplicaSet that never finished rolling, and consumers talk to the pod; 4. the routes the live service actually serves. **Why this exists.** Between 2026-08-13 and 2026-08-16 production was silently rolled back to the TEN-WP-0004 image, so the lifecycle routes verified live on 2026-08-13 were not being served. Nothing alerted. `user-engine` saw `404`, and because its conformance evidence is contract-level, its tests passed throughout. flex-auth suffered a parallel rollback in the same window that surfaced as `403`. Two different symptoms, one cause, no signal either time. The route check is not redundant with the digest check. A digest comparison catches a changed pin; it is blind to whether the workload behind a correct digest still serves the contract. Both failures we have actually seen were invisible because they produced *ordinary-looking* responses rather than errors. If it reports `Unauthorized`, check the cluster before the credential — `KUBECONFIG` defaulting to another cluster produces an identical message, and that cost us a round trip. ## Rollback ```bash kubectl -n tenant-engine rollout undo deploy/tenant-engine ``` If the ReplicaSet history has been pruned, re-apply the manifest with the last-known-good digest below. | Deployment | Digest | State | | --- | --- | --- | | `tenant-engine` | `sha256:08be0b1dcdc65575592b7be665c28e09a82316ea3d4c9b551ccb753f25360612` | **current** — TEN-WP-0005 lifecycle API, CI-built from `7e68cc8`, live 2026-08-14 | | `tenant-engine` *(previous)* | `sha256:2249e8c6ee44ae36081cddc52daf9c3f63acd18a95a5d620ab4fa7ac85149207` | TEN-WP-0004 create/role/plan API, live 2026-08-09 to 2026-08-14 | | `tenant-engine` *(earlier)* | `sha256:33c5dd84eaf1c2f5e067c04931219e13f9348a764a153d641035a6d019095d4f` | first TEN-WP-0004 revision | Rolling back to `2249e8c6…` removes the lifecycle routes (`GET /tenants/{id}`, `PATCH`, retire, reactivate). Create, role grant/revoke, and plan assign keep working. The SQLite lifecycle columns added by the TEN-WP-0005 migration are forward-only and stay in place; the older image ignores them.