41 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
41 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
id: H-005
|
||
|
|
title: Verification Energy
|
||
|
|
status: PROPOSED
|
||
|
|
created: "2026-08-22"
|
||
|
|
experiments: []
|
||
|
|
concepts: [C-energy]
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
# H-005 — Verification Energy
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Claim
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Historical evidence about defects caught, adaptations required, false positives
|
||
|
|
and duplication can identify verification assets whose continued execution is
|
||
|
|
more valuable than others.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Falsification condition
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Energy scores computed from event history fail to rank assets better than a
|
||
|
|
trivial baseline (e.g. recency, or uniform priority) when predicting which assets
|
||
|
|
subsequently catch a defect.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Why no experiment is planned yet
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
**This hypothesis is not testable at the current scale and is deliberately
|
||
|
|
dormant.** Validating it requires event history across many assets over months —
|
||
|
|
history the spike will not accumulate. Implementing a scoring function now would
|
||
|
|
produce a number that cannot be checked, which is worse than no number.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
`TD-WP-0002` therefore records **raw immutable `EnergyEvent`s from the first run**
|
||
|
|
and implements no scoring, decay, or selection logic. Events cannot be
|
||
|
|
reconstructed later; scores can always be computed later.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
This is the hypothesis most likely to be **cheaply built and never validated**,
|
||
|
|
which is precisely why it is fenced off.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Status log
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- 2026-08-22 `PROPOSED`, dormant by decision. Event capture only.
|