T02: adaptation classification and intent provenance design
Answers the two questions gating the rest of TD-WP-0002. Classifier: stratify evidence into S1 surface / S2 realization / S3 judgment. Adaptation writes only to S1; claims and invariants are run inputs with no adaptation write path, so False Adaptation Rate = 0 is architectural rather than a tuning target. Classification is a total function over three signals, defaulting to AMBIGUOUS on missing evidence; a surface change concurrent with a verdict change is PRODUCT_DEFECT. Semantic actions declare permitted surfaces so surface-substitution cannot pass as recovery. Provenance: claims require a source causally independent of the implementation. agent-from-implementation output is an exploratory hypothesis until a human promotes it. New adoption precondition D-07: test-driver requires an independent observation channel into the system under test. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 1629012@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 78d4fb13-8a1e-474b-87a3-9b9261c49a39
This commit is contained in:
parent
c856cb9e64
commit
15b55c807a
2 changed files with 212 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ satisfying to build, and impossible to validate at this stage:
|
|||
One process, one database, one browser engine, one application under test.
|
||||
- Novelty belongs in the verification model, never in the infrastructure.
|
||||
- No LLM judgment where a deterministic oracle is available (Concept Model §2.3).
|
||||
- Evidence stratification S1/S2/S3 and claim provenance per
|
||||
`docs/TestDriverClassificationDesign.md` (decision
|
||||
`fef5213f-ce9b-44c2-b327-a0b0ba4b6270`). Adaptation writes only to S1.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -101,7 +104,7 @@ taxonomy has no class for document-to-document drift.
|
|||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: TD-WP-0002-T02
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
status: done
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "e5776cf5-0475-5dc6-90c3-db772ce24d63"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
|
@ -122,6 +125,23 @@ survives in each case.
|
|||
|
||||
Deliverable: `docs/TestDriverClassificationDesign.md` + one recorded decision.
|
||||
|
||||
**Done 2026-08-22.** Design note written; decision
|
||||
`fef5213f-ce9b-44c2-b327-a0b0ba4b6270` recorded in the hub.
|
||||
|
||||
Outcome in one line: **adaptation may write only to surface evidence (S1); claims
|
||||
and invariants are run inputs with no adaptation write path.** False Adaptation
|
||||
Rate = 0 therefore becomes an architectural property rather than a tuning target —
|
||||
the system cannot express "accept a defect as an adaptation". Classification is a
|
||||
total function over three signals defaulting to `AMBIGUOUS`; a surface change
|
||||
concurrent with a verdict change classifies as `PRODUCT_DEFECT`, never as
|
||||
adaptation. Claims require causally independent provenance.
|
||||
|
||||
Two consequences that change later tasks:
|
||||
- **D-07** — an independent observation channel into the system under test is now
|
||||
an explicit adoption precondition, not an implementation detail. T05 must expose
|
||||
one in the lab; without it S2/S3 collapse into S1.
|
||||
- A fourth self-test, `td://self/intent-independence`, joins the T06 set.
|
||||
|
||||
## Minimal research control plane
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue