T03: research control plane
H-001..H-005 with explicit falsification conditions, E-001..E-003, the Concept-Implementation Fitness Map, findings log and ID convention. Plain files, no tooling. - fitness map corrects Improvement Loop section 13 levels downward: nothing exceeds C1 without implementation - H-005 (Energy) dormant by decision - events captured, no scoring written - H-001 gets a genuine control arm so the semantic-action thesis is not trivially true - E-003 added: deliberately attacks the safety boundary rather than only sampling benign cases Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Assistant: claude-code Assistant-Model: opus Assistant-Process: 1629012@bnt-lap001 Assistant-Session: 78d4fb13-8a1e-474b-87a3-9b9261c49a39
This commit is contained in:
parent
15b55c807a
commit
bec7fdc465
11 changed files with 430 additions and 0 deletions
41
research/hypotheses/H-001-semantic-action-stability.md
Normal file
41
research/hypotheses/H-001-semantic-action-stability.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
id: H-001
|
||||
title: Semantic Action Stability
|
||||
status: PROPOSED
|
||||
created: "2026-08-22"
|
||||
experiments: [E-001]
|
||||
concepts: [C-semantic-action]
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# H-001 — Semantic Action Stability
|
||||
|
||||
## Claim
|
||||
|
||||
A semantic action survives implementation restructuring better than a recorded UI
|
||||
interaction sequence.
|
||||
|
||||
## Falsification condition
|
||||
|
||||
Across the labelled mechanical mutations in the lab (T05), a recorded interaction
|
||||
sequence survives **at least as many** mutations as the semantic action does.
|
||||
|
||||
If mechanics-free identity buys no measurable durability, the central abstraction
|
||||
is decorative and `SemanticAction` should be reduced to a naming convention.
|
||||
|
||||
## Measurement
|
||||
|
||||
Mechanical Recovery Rate for each of two arms over the same mutation set:
|
||||
- **arm A** — semantic action realized by an agentic driver;
|
||||
- **arm B** — a recorded selector-based sequence captured against the baseline.
|
||||
|
||||
Arm B is a genuine control and must be run, not assumed to fail.
|
||||
|
||||
## Threats to validity
|
||||
|
||||
The comparison is unfair if arm B is built naively — a brittle straw man makes
|
||||
H-001 trivially true and worthless. Arm B uses the most robust selector strategy
|
||||
reasonably available (roles, labels, test ids where the lab provides them).
|
||||
|
||||
## Status log
|
||||
|
||||
- 2026-08-22 `PROPOSED`. No evidence.
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue