docs: publish reviewed NetKingdom evidence batch 4

This commit is contained in:
codex 2026-10-14 09:49:06 +02:00
parent d260b123bd
commit 2f302e8815
40 changed files with 3114 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
---
id: capability.iam.key-cape
name: OIDC identity and assurance
summary: OIDC code with PKCE, service tokens, JWKS, MFA and caller CLI.
owner: key-cape
status: draft
domain: infotech
tags:
- iam
- oidc
- netkingdom
- security
- framework-reuse
maturity:
discovery:
current: D4
target: D5
confidence: high
rationale: README documents a versioned canonical contract (net-kingdom canon/standards/iam-profile_v0.2.md),
explicit lightweight-vs-expanded (Keycloak) migration story, and a completed
implementation status (all 23 workplan tasks, 21 green test packages).
availability:
current: A4
target: A4
confidence: high
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: OIDC code with PKCE, service
tokens, JWKS, MFA and caller CLI. Availability describes the delivery form,
not production acceptance. Current stack is Authelia, LLDAP and privacyIDEA;
service secrets remain static and recovery proof has open gates.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C2
confidence: low
basis: scope_vs_intent_and_consumer_expectations
satisfied_expectations:
- full v0.1 implementation per its own workplan (23/23 tasks)
- 21 test packages, all green
- documented lightweight-to-expanded (Keycloak) migration path
broken_expectations: []
out_of_scope_expectations: []
reliability:
level: R1
confidence: low
basis: consumer_quality_signals
known_reliability_risks:
- maturity claims rely on the repo's own workplan completion record, not independently
re-verified in this sweep
discovery:
intent: OIDC code with PKCE, service tokens, JWKS, MFA and caller CLI
includes:
- OIDC code with PKCE, service tokens, JWKS, MFA and caller CLI
excludes:
- Current stack is Authelia, LLDAP and privacyIDEA; service secrets remain static
and recovery proof has open gates
assumptions: []
use_cases:
- 'U02: Human signs in with MFA and manages account or factor recovery'
- 'U03: Application combines identity, tenant and resource facts and enforces a
bound decision'
- 'U04: Protected operation obtains and consumes exact human approval before its
side effect'
- 'U10: Operator recovers identity, custody or data with independently held recovery
material'
research_memos: []
availability:
current_level: A4
target_level: A4
current_artifacts:
- SCOPE.md
- README.md
target_artifacts: []
consumption_modes:
- HTTP API
- source
relations:
depends_on: []
supports: []
related_to:
- capability.identity.user-engine
- capability.identity.tenant-facts
- capability.authorization.policy-evaluate
evidence:
documentation:
- SCOPE.md
- README.md
tests:
- .gitea/workflows/
- .forgejo/workflows/
consumer_feedback: []
bug_reports: []
incidents: []
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Human signs in with MFA and manages account or factor recovery
- Application combines identity, tenant and resource facts and enforces a bound
decision
- Protected operation obtains and consumes exact human approval before its side
effect
- Operator recovers identity, custody or data with independently held recovery material
not_recommended_for:
- Current stack is Authelia, LLDAP and privacyIDEA; service secrets remain static
and recovery proof has open gates
known_limitations:
- Current stack is Authelia, LLDAP and privacyIDEA; service secrets remain static
and recovery proof has open gates
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
promotion_history:
- date: '2026-10-14'
dimension: availability
from: A2
to: A4
rationale: Interface-form reassessment from current owner sources; no completeness/reliability
promotion.
author: codex
---
# OIDC identity and assurance
OIDC code with PKCE, service tokens, JWKS, MFA and caller CLI.
## Reuse boundary
Current stack is Authelia, LLDAP and privacyIDEA; service secrets remain static and recovery proof has open gates.
## Supported use cases
- U02: Human signs in with MFA and manages account or factor recovery
- U03: Application combines identity, tenant and resource facts and enforces a bound decision
- U04: Protected operation obtains and consumes exact human approval before its side effect
- U10: Operator recovers identity, custody or data with independently held recovery material
## Evidence and integration
- [SCOPE.md](../../SCOPE.md)
- [README.md](../../README.md)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
version: 1
updated: '2026-10-14'
domain: helix_forge
capabilities:
- id: capability.iam.key-cape
name: OIDC identity and assurance
summary: OIDC code with PKCE, service tokens, JWKS, MFA and caller CLI.
domain: infotech
status: draft
owner: key-cape
tags:
- iam
- oidc
- netkingdom
- security
- framework-reuse
vector: D4 / A4 / C2 / R1
path: registry/capabilities/capability.iam.key-cape.md
consumption_modes:
- HTTP API
- source

View file

@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
---
id: capability.security.posture-assessment
owner: kings-guard
status: draft
domain: infotech
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D5
confidence: medium
rationale: Owner scope, neighboring responsibilities, concrete use cases and limitations
are documented; no exhaustive or generalized maturity claim.
availability:
current: A2
target: A2
confidence: medium
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: Normalized observation evaluator,
cadence checks and secret-use snapshot adapter. Availability describes the delivery
form, not production acceptance. Bounded reference pilot; containment proposals
only; deployed-stream admission remains open.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C1
confidence: low
basis: Source artifacts establish a bounded capability; no independent consumer-completeness
assessment in this review.
reliability:
level: R0
confidence: low
basis: No longitudinal consumer reliability measurement established by this review.
name: Security posture assessment and response proposals
summary: Normalized observation evaluator, cadence checks and secret-use snapshot
adapter.
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
discovery:
intent: Normalized observation evaluator, cadence checks and secret-use snapshot
adapter
includes:
- Normalized observation evaluator, cadence checks and secret-use snapshot adapter
excludes:
- Bounded reference pilot; containment proposals only; deployed-stream admission
remains open
use_cases:
- 'U08: Consumer emits security events and reconciles independently retained evidence'
- 'U09: Maintainer observes posture, prioritizes findings, coordinates work and
verifies outcomes'
availability:
current_level: A2
target_level: A2
current_artifacts:
- SCOPE.md
- docs/SecretUseSnapshotAdmission.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
relations:
related_to:
- capability.security.maturity-claims
- capability.audit.event-retain
- capability.security.risk-register
- capability.security.iam-tooling-suite
evidence:
documentation:
- SCOPE.md
- docs/SecretUseSnapshotAdmission.md
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Consumer emits security events and reconciles independently retained evidence
- Maintainer observes posture, prioritizes findings, coordinates work and verifies
outcomes
not_recommended_for:
- Bounded reference pilot; containment proposals only; deployed-stream admission
remains open
known_limitations:
- Bounded reference pilot; containment proposals only; deployed-stream admission
remains open
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
---
# Security posture assessment and response proposals
Normalized observation evaluator, cadence checks and secret-use snapshot adapter.
## Reuse boundary
Bounded reference pilot; containment proposals only; deployed-stream admission remains open.
## Supported use cases
- U08: Consumer emits security events and reconciles independently retained evidence
- U09: Maintainer observes posture, prioritizes findings, coordinates work and verifies outcomes
## Evidence and integration
- [SCOPE.md](../../SCOPE.md)
- [docs/SecretUseSnapshotAdmission.md](../../docs/SecretUseSnapshotAdmission.md)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
version: 1
domain: infotech
capabilities:
- id: capability.security.posture-assessment
name: Security posture assessment and response proposals
summary: Normalized observation evaluator, cadence checks and secret-use snapshot
adapter.
domain: infotech
status: draft
owner: kings-guard
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A2 / C1 / R0
path: registry/capabilities/capability.security.posture-assessment.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
updated: '2026-10-14'

View file

@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
---
id: capability.security.maturity-claims
owner: maturity-engine
status: draft
domain: infotech
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D5
confidence: medium
rationale: Owner scope, neighboring responsibilities, concrete use cases and limitations
are documented; no exhaustive or generalized maturity claim.
availability:
current: A2
target: A2
confidence: medium
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: SQLite library and CLI for ladders,
evidence expiry, compute, explain and stance inventory. Availability describes
the delivery form, not production acceptance. No production deployment claimed;
levels supply facts and cannot authorize actions.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C1
confidence: low
basis: Source artifacts establish a bounded capability; no independent consumer-completeness
assessment in this review.
reliability:
level: R0
confidence: low
basis: No longitudinal consumer reliability measurement established by this review.
name: Evidence-based maturity claims and gap register
summary: SQLite library and CLI for ladders, evidence expiry, compute, explain and
stance inventory.
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
discovery:
intent: SQLite library and CLI for ladders, evidence expiry, compute, explain and
stance inventory
includes:
- SQLite library and CLI for ladders, evidence expiry, compute, explain and stance
inventory
excludes:
- No production deployment claimed; levels supply facts and cannot authorize actions
use_cases:
- 'U09: Maintainer observes posture, prioritizes findings, coordinates work and
verifies outcomes'
- 'U14: Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference
compositions'
availability:
current_level: A2
target_level: A2
current_artifacts:
- SCOPE.md
- docs/claim-contract.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
relations:
related_to:
- capability.security.doctrine-review
- capability.authorization.policy-evaluate
- capability.security.posture-assessment
evidence:
documentation:
- SCOPE.md
- docs/claim-contract.md
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Maintainer observes posture, prioritizes findings, coordinates work and verifies
outcomes
- Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference
compositions
not_recommended_for:
- No production deployment claimed; levels supply facts and cannot authorize actions
known_limitations:
- No production deployment claimed; levels supply facts and cannot authorize actions
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
---
# Evidence-based maturity claims and gap register
SQLite library and CLI for ladders, evidence expiry, compute, explain and stance inventory.
## Reuse boundary
No production deployment claimed; levels supply facts and cannot authorize actions.
## Supported use cases
- U09: Maintainer observes posture, prioritizes findings, coordinates work and verifies outcomes
- U14: Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference compositions
## Evidence and integration
- [SCOPE.md](../../SCOPE.md)
- [docs/claim-contract.md](../../docs/claim-contract.md)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
version: 1
domain: infotech
capabilities:
- id: capability.security.maturity-claims
name: Evidence-based maturity claims and gap register
summary: SQLite library and CLI for ladders, evidence expiry, compute, explain and
stance inventory.
domain: infotech
status: draft
owner: maturity-engine
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A2 / C1 / R0
path: registry/capabilities/capability.security.maturity-claims.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
updated: '2026-10-14'

View file

@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
---
id: capability.security.bootstrap-recovery
owner: net-kingdom
status: draft
domain: infotech
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D5
confidence: medium
rationale: Owner scope, neighboring responsibilities, concrete use cases and limitations
are documented; no exhaustive or generalized maturity claim.
availability:
current: A2
target: A2
confidence: medium
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: Local identity, bootstrap console,
encrypted custody handoff and caller tools. Availability describes the delivery
form, not production acceptance. Source repairs and disposable native fixtures
do not prove estate root isolation or recovery.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C1
confidence: low
basis: Source artifacts establish a bounded capability; no independent consumer-completeness
assessment in this review.
reliability:
level: R0
confidence: low
basis: No longitudinal consumer reliability measurement established by this review.
name: Guarded bootstrap and recovery preparation
summary: Local identity, bootstrap console, encrypted custody handoff and caller tools.
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
discovery:
intent: Local identity, bootstrap console, encrypted custody handoff and caller
tools
includes:
- Local identity, bootstrap console, encrypted custody handoff and caller tools
excludes:
- Source repairs and disposable native fixtures do not prove estate root isolation
or recovery
use_cases:
- 'U10: Operator recovers identity, custody or data with independently held recovery
material'
availability:
current_level: A2
target_level: A2
current_artifacts:
- tools/security-bootstrap-console/README.md
- tools/custody-record/README.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
relations:
related_to:
- capability.security.practice-canon
- capability.security.doctrine-review
- capability.iam.key-cape
- capability.authorization.policy-evaluate
- capability.registry.register
specializes:
- capability.security.iam-tooling-suite
evidence:
documentation:
- tools/security-bootstrap-console/README.md
- tools/custody-record/README.md
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Operator recovers identity, custody or data with independently held recovery material
not_recommended_for:
- Source repairs and disposable native fixtures do not prove estate root isolation
or recovery
known_limitations:
- Source repairs and disposable native fixtures do not prove estate root isolation
or recovery
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
---
# Guarded bootstrap and recovery preparation
Local identity, bootstrap console, encrypted custody handoff and caller tools.
## Reuse boundary
Source repairs and disposable native fixtures do not prove estate root isolation or recovery.
## Supported use cases
- U10: Operator recovers identity, custody or data with independently held recovery material
## Evidence and integration
- [tools/security-bootstrap-console/README.md](../../tools/security-bootstrap-console/README.md)
- [tools/custody-record/README.md](../../tools/custody-record/README.md)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
---
id: capability.security.case-contracts
owner: net-kingdom
status: draft
domain: infotech
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D5
confidence: medium
rationale: Owner scope, neighboring responsibilities, concrete use cases and limitations
are documented; no exhaustive or generalized maturity claim.
availability:
current: A2
target: A2
confidence: medium
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: Versioned types, cases and schema
validation. Availability describes the delivery form, not production acceptance.
Type acknowledgment, case acceptance, structural materialization and native
execution are distinct.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C1
confidence: low
basis: Source artifacts establish a bounded capability; no independent consumer-completeness
assessment in this review.
reliability:
level: R0
confidence: low
basis: No longitudinal consumer reliability measurement established by this review.
name: Security case types and instance validation
summary: Versioned types, cases and schema validation.
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
discovery:
intent: Versioned types, cases and schema validation
includes:
- Versioned types, cases and schema validation
excludes:
- Type acknowledgment, case acceptance, structural materialization and native execution
are distinct
use_cases:
- 'U01: Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and
case types'
- 'U05: Operator provisions and delivers a scoped workload credential through the
approved owner lane'
- 'U06: Operator or automation obtains a bounded SSH certificate and maintains private
connectivity'
availability:
current_level: A2
target_level: A2
current_artifacts:
- tools/security-case-types/README.md
- canon/standards/security-case-types_v0.1.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
relations:
related_to:
- capability.security.practice-canon
- capability.security.doctrine-review
- capability.iam.key-cape
- capability.authorization.policy-evaluate
- capability.registry.register
specializes:
- capability.security.iam-tooling-suite
evidence:
documentation:
- tools/security-case-types/README.md
- canon/standards/security-case-types_v0.1.md
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and case
types
- Operator provisions and delivers a scoped workload credential through the approved
owner lane
- Operator or automation obtains a bounded SSH certificate and maintains private
connectivity
not_recommended_for:
- Type acknowledgment, case acceptance, structural materialization and native execution
are distinct
known_limitations:
- Type acknowledgment, case acceptance, structural materialization and native execution
are distinct
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
---
# Security case types and instance validation
Versioned types, cases and schema validation.
## Reuse boundary
Type acknowledgment, case acceptance, structural materialization and native execution are distinct.
## Supported use cases
- U01: Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and case types
- U05: Operator provisions and delivers a scoped workload credential through the approved owner lane
- U06: Operator or automation obtains a bounded SSH certificate and maintains private connectivity
## Evidence and integration
- [tools/security-case-types/README.md](../../tools/security-case-types/README.md)
- [canon/standards/security-case-types_v0.1.md](../../canon/standards/security-case-types_v0.1.md)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
---
id: capability.security.emission-profile
owner: net-kingdom
status: draft
domain: infotech
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D5
confidence: medium
rationale: Owner scope, neighboring responsibilities, concrete use cases and limitations
are documented; no exhaustive or generalized maturity claim.
availability:
current: A2
target: A2
confidence: medium
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: Security profile over generic
emission contracts and validator. Availability describes the delivery form,
not production acceptance. Profile adoption and source completeness require
owner-native evidence.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C1
confidence: low
basis: Source artifacts establish a bounded capability; no independent consumer-completeness
assessment in this review.
reliability:
level: R0
confidence: low
basis: No longitudinal consumer reliability measurement established by this review.
name: Security emission cadence validation
summary: Security profile over generic emission contracts and validator.
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
discovery:
intent: Security profile over generic emission contracts and validator
includes:
- Security profile over generic emission contracts and validator
excludes:
- Profile adoption and source completeness require owner-native evidence
use_cases:
- 'U08: Consumer emits security events and reconciles independently retained evidence'
- 'U09: Maintainer observes posture, prioritizes findings, coordinates work and
verifies outcomes'
availability:
current_level: A2
target_level: A2
current_artifacts:
- tools/emission-cadence-profile/README.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
relations:
related_to:
- capability.security.practice-canon
- capability.security.doctrine-review
- capability.iam.key-cape
- capability.authorization.policy-evaluate
- capability.registry.register
specializes:
- capability.security.iam-tooling-suite
evidence:
documentation:
- tools/emission-cadence-profile/README.md
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Consumer emits security events and reconciles independently retained evidence
- Maintainer observes posture, prioritizes findings, coordinates work and verifies
outcomes
not_recommended_for:
- Profile adoption and source completeness require owner-native evidence
known_limitations:
- Profile adoption and source completeness require owner-native evidence
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
---
# Security emission cadence validation
Security profile over generic emission contracts and validator.
## Reuse boundary
Profile adoption and source completeness require owner-native evidence.
## Supported use cases
- U08: Consumer emits security events and reconciles independently retained evidence
- U09: Maintainer observes posture, prioritizes findings, coordinates work and verifies outcomes
## Evidence and integration
- [tools/emission-cadence-profile/README.md](../../tools/emission-cadence-profile/README.md)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
---
id: capability.security.iam-tooling-suite
name: NetKingdom security architecture and conformance tooling
summary: Versioned IAM, layer, tenancy and credential contracts plus validators.
owner: net-kingdom
status: draft
domain: infotech
tags:
- security
- iam
- kubernetes
- conformance
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D5
confidence: medium
rationale: SCOPE plus docs/secrets-engine-security-infrastructure-boundary.md
describe an explicit integration boundary with OpenBao, flex-auth, user-engine,
ops-warden, ops-bridge, info-tech-canon, and State Hub; canon/standards/ holds
versioned IAM v0.3, playbook capability, scenario composition, tenancy, zone,
and boundary standards that provider repos implement against.
availability:
current: A2
target: A3
confidence: medium
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: Versioned IAM, layer, tenancy
and credential contracts plus validators. Availability describes the delivery
form, not production acceptance. Mixed accepted and proposed standards; framework
integration remains incomplete.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C1
confidence: low
basis: scope_vs_intent_and_consumer_expectations
satisfied_expectations:
- versioned canon standards already implemented by a sibling repo (key-cape)
- documented, runnable conformance, posture, composition, and bootstrap tools
under tools/
broken_expectations: []
out_of_scope_expectations: []
reliability:
level: R1
confidence: low
basis: consumer_quality_signals
known_reliability_risks:
- no top-level packaging; each tool under tools/ has its own runtime dependencies,
no unified install path yet
discovery:
intent: Versioned IAM, layer, tenancy and credential contracts plus validators
includes:
- Versioned IAM, layer, tenancy and credential contracts plus validators
excludes:
- Mixed accepted and proposed standards; framework integration remains incomplete
assumptions: []
use_cases:
- 'U01: Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and
case types'
- 'U02: Human signs in with MFA and manages account or factor recovery'
- 'U03: Application combines identity, tenant and resource facts and enforces a
bound decision'
- 'U14: Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference
compositions'
research_memos: []
availability:
current_level: A2
target_level: A3
current_artifacts:
- SCOPE.md
- SECURITY-COMPANION.md
target_artifacts: []
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
relations:
depends_on: []
supports: []
related_to:
- capability.security.practice-canon
- capability.security.doctrine-review
- capability.iam.key-cape
- capability.authorization.policy-evaluate
- capability.registry.register
evidence:
documentation:
- SCOPE.md
- SECURITY-COMPANION.md
tests:
- tools/iam-profile-conformance (pytest fixtures)
consumer_feedback: []
bug_reports: []
incidents: []
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and case
types
- Human signs in with MFA and manages account or factor recovery
- Application combines identity, tenant and resource facts and enforces a bound
decision
- Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference
compositions
not_recommended_for:
- Mixed accepted and proposed standards; framework integration remains incomplete
known_limitations:
- Mixed accepted and proposed standards; framework integration remains incomplete
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
promotion_history: []
---
# NetKingdom security architecture and conformance tooling
Versioned IAM, layer, tenancy and credential contracts plus validators.
## Reuse boundary
Mixed accepted and proposed standards; framework integration remains incomplete.
## Supported use cases
- U01: Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and case types
- U02: Human signs in with MFA and manages account or factor recovery
- U03: Application combines identity, tenant and resource facts and enforces a bound decision
- U14: Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference compositions
## Evidence and integration
- [SCOPE.md](../../SCOPE.md)
- [SECURITY-COMPANION.md](../../SECURITY-COMPANION.md)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
---
id: capability.security.posture-feedback
owner: net-kingdom
status: draft
domain: infotech
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D5
confidence: medium
rationale: Owner scope, neighboring responsibilities, concrete use cases and limitations
are documented; no exhaustive or generalized maturity claim.
availability:
current: A2
target: A2
confidence: medium
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: CLI evaluates evidence age and
posture into owner-routed findings. Availability describes the delivery form,
not production acceptance. Proposal only; no policy changes or remediation execution.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C1
confidence: low
basis: Source artifacts establish a bounded capability; no independent consumer-completeness
assessment in this review.
reliability:
level: R0
confidence: low
basis: No longitudinal consumer reliability measurement established by this review.
name: Deterministic posture feedback
summary: CLI evaluates evidence age and posture into owner-routed findings.
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
discovery:
intent: CLI evaluates evidence age and posture into owner-routed findings
includes:
- CLI evaluates evidence age and posture into owner-routed findings
excludes:
- Proposal only; no policy changes or remediation execution
use_cases:
- 'U09: Maintainer observes posture, prioritizes findings, coordinates work and
verifies outcomes'
- 'U14: Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference
compositions'
availability:
current_level: A2
target_level: A2
current_artifacts:
- tools/posture-feedback/README.md
- tools/posture-feedback/posture_feedback.py
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
relations:
related_to:
- capability.security.practice-canon
- capability.security.doctrine-review
- capability.iam.key-cape
- capability.authorization.policy-evaluate
- capability.registry.register
specializes:
- capability.security.iam-tooling-suite
evidence:
documentation:
- tools/posture-feedback/README.md
- tools/posture-feedback/posture_feedback.py
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Maintainer observes posture, prioritizes findings, coordinates work and verifies
outcomes
- Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference
compositions
not_recommended_for:
- Proposal only; no policy changes or remediation execution
known_limitations:
- Proposal only; no policy changes or remediation execution
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
---
# Deterministic posture feedback
CLI evaluates evidence age and posture into owner-routed findings.
## Reuse boundary
Proposal only; no policy changes or remediation execution.
## Supported use cases
- U09: Maintainer observes posture, prioritizes findings, coordinates work and verifies outcomes
- U14: Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference compositions
## Evidence and integration
- [tools/posture-feedback/README.md](../../tools/posture-feedback/README.md)
- [tools/posture-feedback/posture_feedback.py](../../tools/posture-feedback/posture_feedback.py)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
---
id: capability.security.scenario-compose
owner: net-kingdom
status: draft
domain: infotech
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D5
confidence: medium
rationale: Owner scope, neighboring responsibilities, concrete use cases and limitations
are documented; no exhaustive or generalized maturity claim.
availability:
current: A2
target: A2
confidence: medium
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: CLI selects pinned providers
and orders trust transitions. Availability describes the delivery form, not
production acceptance. Plan only; execution.permitted is always false.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C1
confidence: low
basis: Source artifacts establish a bounded capability; no independent consumer-completeness
assessment in this review.
reliability:
level: R0
confidence: low
basis: No longitudinal consumer reliability measurement established by this review.
name: Deterministic security scenario composition
summary: CLI selects pinned providers and orders trust transitions.
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
discovery:
intent: CLI selects pinned providers and orders trust transitions
includes:
- CLI selects pinned providers and orders trust transitions
excludes:
- Plan only; execution.permitted is always false
use_cases:
- 'U01: Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and
case types'
- 'U14: Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference
compositions'
availability:
current_level: A2
target_level: A2
current_artifacts:
- tools/security-scenario-composer/README.md
- tools/security-scenario-composer/security_scenario_composer.py
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
relations:
related_to:
- capability.security.practice-canon
- capability.security.doctrine-review
- capability.iam.key-cape
- capability.authorization.policy-evaluate
- capability.registry.register
specializes:
- capability.security.iam-tooling-suite
evidence:
documentation:
- tools/security-scenario-composer/README.md
- tools/security-scenario-composer/security_scenario_composer.py
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and case
types
- Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference
compositions
not_recommended_for:
- Plan only; execution.permitted is always false
known_limitations:
- Plan only; execution.permitted is always false
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
---
# Deterministic security scenario composition
CLI selects pinned providers and orders trust transitions.
## Reuse boundary
Plan only; execution.permitted is always false.
## Supported use cases
- U01: Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and case types
- U14: Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference compositions
## Evidence and integration
- [tools/security-scenario-composer/README.md](../../tools/security-scenario-composer/README.md)
- [tools/security-scenario-composer/security_scenario_composer.py](../../tools/security-scenario-composer/security_scenario_composer.py)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
version: 1
updated: '2026-10-14'
domain: helix_forge
capabilities:
- id: capability.security.iam-tooling-suite
name: NetKingdom security architecture and conformance tooling
summary: Versioned IAM, layer, tenancy and credential contracts plus validators.
domain: infotech
status: draft
owner: net-kingdom
tags:
- security
- iam
- kubernetes
- conformance
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A2 / C1 / R1
path: registry/capabilities/capability.security.iam-tooling-suite.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
- id: capability.security.scenario-compose
name: Deterministic security scenario composition
summary: CLI selects pinned providers and orders trust transitions.
domain: infotech
status: draft
owner: net-kingdom
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A2 / C1 / R0
path: registry/capabilities/capability.security.scenario-compose.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
- id: capability.security.posture-feedback
name: Deterministic posture feedback
summary: CLI evaluates evidence age and posture into owner-routed findings.
domain: infotech
status: draft
owner: net-kingdom
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A2 / C1 / R0
path: registry/capabilities/capability.security.posture-feedback.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
- id: capability.security.case-contracts
name: Security case types and instance validation
summary: Versioned types, cases and schema validation.
domain: infotech
status: draft
owner: net-kingdom
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A2 / C1 / R0
path: registry/capabilities/capability.security.case-contracts.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
- id: capability.security.bootstrap-recovery
name: Guarded bootstrap and recovery preparation
summary: Local identity, bootstrap console, encrypted custody handoff and caller
tools.
domain: infotech
status: draft
owner: net-kingdom
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A2 / C1 / R0
path: registry/capabilities/capability.security.bootstrap-recovery.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
- id: capability.security.emission-profile
name: Security emission cadence validation
summary: Security profile over generic emission contracts and validator.
domain: infotech
status: draft
owner: net-kingdom
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A2 / C1 / R0
path: registry/capabilities/capability.security.emission-profile.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source

View file

@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
---
id: capability.ops.tunnel-bridge
name: SSH tunnel lifecycle
summary: Named tunnels, reconnect, health and TTL-aware cert_command.
owner: ops-bridge
status: draft
domain: infotech
tags:
- ssh
- tunnel
- ops
- connectivity
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D5
confidence: medium
rationale: README.txt documents named tunnels, auto-reconnect with exponential
backoff, HTTP health checks, and structured JSON audit events per tunnel; this
is also the tool underlying reuse-surface's own `/bridge` skill.
availability:
current: A2
target: A3
confidence: medium
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: Named tunnels, reconnect, health
and TTL-aware cert_command. Availability describes the delivery form, not production
acceptance. Private transport does not authenticate applications or decide access.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C2
confidence: low
basis: scope_vs_intent_and_consumer_expectations
satisfied_expectations:
- auto-reconnecting named SSH reverse tunnels
- HTTP health checks confirming forwarded service reachability, not just SSH liveness
- structured audit event log per tunnel
broken_expectations: []
out_of_scope_expectations: []
reliability:
level: R1
confidence: low
basis: consumer_quality_signals
known_reliability_risks:
- operational tool with real production usage but no independent load/failure
testing recorded in this sweep
discovery:
intent: Named tunnels, reconnect, health and TTL-aware cert_command
includes:
- Named tunnels, reconnect, health and TTL-aware cert_command
excludes:
- Private transport does not authenticate applications or decide access
assumptions: []
use_cases:
- 'U06: Operator or automation obtains a bounded SSH certificate and maintains private
connectivity'
research_memos: []
availability:
current_level: A2
target_level: A3
current_artifacts:
- SCOPE.md
target_artifacts: []
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
relations:
depends_on: []
supports: []
related_to:
- capability.security.iam-tooling-suite
evidence:
documentation:
- SCOPE.md
tests:
- tests/
consumer_feedback: []
bug_reports: []
incidents: []
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Operator or automation obtains a bounded SSH certificate and maintains private
connectivity
not_recommended_for:
- Private transport does not authenticate applications or decide access
known_limitations:
- Private transport does not authenticate applications or decide access
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
promotion_history: []
---
# SSH tunnel lifecycle
Named tunnels, reconnect, health and TTL-aware cert_command.
## Reuse boundary
Private transport does not authenticate applications or decide access.
## Supported use cases
- U06: Operator or automation obtains a bounded SSH certificate and maintains private connectivity
## Evidence and integration
- [SCOPE.md](../../SCOPE.md)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
version: 1
updated: '2026-10-14'
domain: helix_forge
capabilities:
- id: capability.ops.tunnel-bridge
name: SSH tunnel lifecycle
summary: Named tunnels, reconnect, health and TTL-aware cert_command.
domain: infotech
status: draft
owner: ops-bridge
tags:
- ssh
- tunnel
- ops
- connectivity
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A2 / C2 / R1
path: registry/capabilities/capability.ops.tunnel-bridge.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source

View file

@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
---
id: capability.security.structure-construction
owner: ops-mason
status: draft
domain: infotech
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D5
confidence: medium
rationale: Owner scope, neighboring responsibilities, concrete use cases and limitations
are documented; no exhaustive or generalized maturity claim.
availability:
current: A2
target: A2
confidence: medium
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: Digest-bound OpenBao AppRole
and Kubernetes-auth plans and guarded apply. Availability describes the delivery
form, not production acceptance. Founder plan gate is an explicit exception;
not full PDP conformance.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C1
confidence: low
basis: Source artifacts establish a bounded capability; no independent consumer-completeness
assessment in this review.
reliability:
level: R0
confidence: low
basis: No longitudinal consumer reliability measurement established by this review.
name: Reviewed security structure construction
summary: Digest-bound OpenBao AppRole and Kubernetes-auth plans and guarded apply.
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
discovery:
intent: Digest-bound OpenBao AppRole and Kubernetes-auth plans and guarded apply
includes:
- Digest-bound OpenBao AppRole and Kubernetes-auth plans and guarded apply
excludes:
- Founder plan gate is an explicit exception; not full PDP conformance
use_cases:
- 'U01: Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and
case types'
- 'U05: Operator provisions and delivers a scoped workload credential through the
approved owner lane'
- 'U06: Operator or automation obtains a bounded SSH certificate and maintains private
connectivity'
availability:
current_level: A2
target_level: A2
current_artifacts:
- SCOPE.md
- docs/construction-plan-format.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
relations:
related_to:
- capability.security.credential-lifecycle
- capability.security.iam-tooling-suite
- capability.railiance.platform-services
evidence:
documentation:
- SCOPE.md
- docs/construction-plan-format.md
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and case
types
- Operator provisions and delivers a scoped workload credential through the approved
owner lane
- Operator or automation obtains a bounded SSH certificate and maintains private
connectivity
not_recommended_for:
- Founder plan gate is an explicit exception; not full PDP conformance
known_limitations:
- Founder plan gate is an explicit exception; not full PDP conformance
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
---
# Reviewed security structure construction
Digest-bound OpenBao AppRole and Kubernetes-auth plans and guarded apply.
## Reuse boundary
Founder plan gate is an explicit exception; not full PDP conformance.
## Supported use cases
- U01: Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and case types
- U05: Operator provisions and delivers a scoped workload credential through the approved owner lane
- U06: Operator or automation obtains a bounded SSH certificate and maintains private connectivity
## Evidence and integration
- [SCOPE.md](../../SCOPE.md)
- [docs/construction-plan-format.md](../../docs/construction-plan-format.md)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
version: 1
domain: infotech
capabilities:
- id: capability.security.structure-construction
name: Reviewed security structure construction
summary: Digest-bound OpenBao AppRole and Kubernetes-auth plans and guarded apply.
domain: infotech
status: draft
owner: ops-mason
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A2 / C1 / R0
path: registry/capabilities/capability.security.structure-construction.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
updated: '2026-10-14'

View file

@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
---
id: capability.security.access-routing
owner: ops-warden
status: draft
domain: infotech
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D5
confidence: medium
rationale: Owner scope, neighboring responsibilities, concrete use cases and limitations
are documented; no exhaustive or generalized maturity claim.
availability:
current: A3
target: A3
confidence: medium
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: warden route and access catalog;
exact lane conduit and secret-exec routing. Availability describes the delivery
form, not production acceptance. Routing grants no authority; interim delegates
and attended high-risk lanes persist.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C1
confidence: low
basis: Source artifacts establish a bounded capability; no independent consumer-completeness
assessment in this review.
reliability:
level: R0
confidence: low
basis: No longitudinal consumer reliability measurement established by this review.
name: Credential routing and contained access
summary: warden route and access catalog; exact lane conduit and secret-exec routing.
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
discovery:
intent: warden route and access catalog; exact lane conduit and secret-exec routing
includes:
- warden route and access catalog; exact lane conduit and secret-exec routing
excludes:
- Routing grants no authority; interim delegates and attended high-risk lanes persist
use_cases:
- 'U04: Protected operation obtains and consumes exact human approval before its
side effect'
- 'U05: Operator provisions and delivers a scoped workload credential through the
approved owner lane'
- 'U06: Operator or automation obtains a bounded SSH certificate and maintains private
connectivity'
availability:
current_level: A3
target_level: A3
current_artifacts:
- SCOPE.md
- wiki/CredentialRouting.md
consumption_modes:
- library
- CLI
relations:
related_to:
- capability.security.credential-lifecycle
- capability.authorization.policy-evaluate
- capability.ops.tunnel-bridge
- capability.security.structure-construction
evidence:
documentation:
- SCOPE.md
- wiki/CredentialRouting.md
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Protected operation obtains and consumes exact human approval before its side
effect
- Operator provisions and delivers a scoped workload credential through the approved
owner lane
- Operator or automation obtains a bounded SSH certificate and maintains private
connectivity
not_recommended_for:
- Routing grants no authority; interim delegates and attended high-risk lanes persist
known_limitations:
- Routing grants no authority; interim delegates and attended high-risk lanes persist
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
---
# Credential routing and contained access
warden route and access catalog; exact lane conduit and secret-exec routing.
## Reuse boundary
Routing grants no authority; interim delegates and attended high-risk lanes persist.
## Supported use cases
- U04: Protected operation obtains and consumes exact human approval before its side effect
- U05: Operator provisions and delivers a scoped workload credential through the approved owner lane
- U06: Operator or automation obtains a bounded SSH certificate and maintains private connectivity
## Evidence and integration
- [SCOPE.md](../../SCOPE.md)
- [wiki/CredentialRouting.md](../../wiki/CredentialRouting.md)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
---
id: capability.security.case-follow-through
owner: ops-warden
status: draft
domain: infotech
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D5
confidence: medium
rationale: Owner scope, neighboring responsibilities, concrete use cases and limitations
are documented; no exhaustive or generalized maturity claim.
availability:
current: A2
target: A2
confidence: medium
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: KnownSecurityCase route, plan
and operational receipts. Availability describes the delivery form, not production
acceptance. Execution requires accepted structure and exact owner contracts;
case closure is not automatic.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C1
confidence: low
basis: Source artifacts establish a bounded capability; no independent consumer-completeness
assessment in this review.
reliability:
level: R0
confidence: low
basis: No longitudinal consumer reliability measurement established by this review.
name: Security case operational follow-through
summary: KnownSecurityCase route, plan and operational receipts.
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
discovery:
intent: KnownSecurityCase route, plan and operational receipts
includes:
- KnownSecurityCase route, plan and operational receipts
excludes:
- Execution requires accepted structure and exact owner contracts; case closure
is not automatic
use_cases:
- 'U01: Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and
case types'
- 'U05: Operator provisions and delivers a scoped workload credential through the
approved owner lane'
- 'U06: Operator or automation obtains a bounded SSH certificate and maintains private
connectivity'
availability:
current_level: A2
target_level: A2
current_artifacts:
- workplans/WARDEN-WP-0044-security-case-follow-through.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
relations:
related_to:
- capability.security.credential-lifecycle
- capability.authorization.policy-evaluate
- capability.ops.tunnel-bridge
- capability.security.structure-construction
evidence:
documentation:
- workplans/WARDEN-WP-0044-security-case-follow-through.md
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and case
types
- Operator provisions and delivers a scoped workload credential through the approved
owner lane
- Operator or automation obtains a bounded SSH certificate and maintains private
connectivity
not_recommended_for:
- Execution requires accepted structure and exact owner contracts; case closure
is not automatic
known_limitations:
- Execution requires accepted structure and exact owner contracts; case closure
is not automatic
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
---
# Security case operational follow-through
KnownSecurityCase route, plan and operational receipts.
## Reuse boundary
Execution requires accepted structure and exact owner contracts; case closure is not automatic.
## Supported use cases
- U01: Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and case types
- U05: Operator provisions and delivers a scoped workload credential through the approved owner lane
- U06: Operator or automation obtains a bounded SSH certificate and maintains private connectivity
## Evidence and integration
- [workplans/WARDEN-WP-0044-security-case-follow-through.md](../../workplans/WARDEN-WP-0044-security-case-follow-through.md)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
---
id: capability.security.ssh-certificate-issuance
name: Decision-bound SSH certificates
summary: warden sign with local and OpenBao backends and adm/agt/atm actors.
owner: ops-warden
status: draft
domain: helix_forge
tags:
- ssh
- certificate
- ca
- ops-warden
- openbao
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
maturity:
discovery:
current: D4
target: D5
confidence: medium
rationale: 'SCOPE, AccessManagementDirective alignment, config runbooks, and cert_command
contract are documented; production OpenBao integration is documented but engine
deployment lives in railiance-platform. A machine-readable routing catalog (registry/routing/catalog.yaml)
and wiki/AccessRouting.md make the "issue SSH, route the rest" boundary discoverable.
'
availability:
current: A3
target: A5
confidence: medium
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: warden sign with local and OpenBao
backends and adm/agt/atm actors. Availability describes the delivery form, not
production acceptance. Direct Tooling contact is a declared gap; certificate
reachability is not target authorization.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C3
name: Functional Core
confidence: medium
basis: scope_vs_intent_and_consumer_expectations
satisfied_expectations:
- local and OpenBao/Vault-compatible signing backends
- TTL policy enforcement per actor type
- principals inventory and cert-side scorecard
- signatures audit log and stale-cert cleanup
- cert_command stdout contract for ops-bridge
broken_expectations:
- host-side principal deployment not owned here
- OpenBao SSH engine mount not deployed from this repo
out_of_scope_expectations:
- long-lived API key custody
- tunnel lifecycle management
- Vault/OpenBao cluster operations
reliability:
level: R2
name: Tolerable
confidence: medium
basis: consumer_quality_signals
known_reliability_risks:
- production signing depends on OpenBao availability and token policy
- local backend requires protected CA key handling by operators
discovery:
intent: warden sign with local and OpenBao backends and adm/agt/atm actors
includes:
- warden sign with local and OpenBao backends and adm/agt/atm actors
excludes:
- Direct Tooling contact is a declared gap; certificate reachability is not target
authorization
assumptions:
- callers supply actor public keys; humans self-issue admin keys
- production platform uses OpenBao with Vault-compatible SSH engine API
use_cases:
- ops-bridge tunnel cert_command
- Inter-Hub bootstrap short-lived agent access
- 'U06: Operator or automation obtains a bounded SSH certificate and maintains private
connectivity'
research_memos:
- ops-warden/SCOPE.md
- ops-warden/wiki/CertCommandInterface.md
- ops-warden/wiki/OpsWardenConfig.md
- ops-warden/wiki/AccessRouting.md
availability:
current_level: A3
target_level: A5
current_artifacts:
- SCOPE.md
- README.md
target_artifacts:
- packaged ops-warden release with documented OpenBao role bootstrap
- '`warden route` lookup CLI over the pointer catalog (WARDEN-WP-0011)'
consumption_modes:
- library
- CLI
relations:
depends_on: []
supports: []
related_to:
- capability.security.credential-lifecycle
- capability.authorization.policy-evaluate
- capability.ops.tunnel-bridge
- capability.security.structure-construction
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Operator or automation obtains a bounded SSH certificate and maintains private
connectivity
not_recommended_for:
- Direct Tooling contact is a declared gap; certificate reachability is not target
authorization
known_limitations:
- Direct Tooling contact is a declared gap; certificate reachability is not target
authorization
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
evidence:
documentation:
- SCOPE.md
- README.md
---
# Decision-bound SSH certificates
warden sign with local and OpenBao backends and adm/agt/atm actors.
## Reuse boundary
Direct Tooling contact is a declared gap; certificate reachability is not target authorization.
## Supported use cases
- U06: Operator or automation obtains a bounded SSH certificate and maintains private connectivity
## Evidence and integration
- [SCOPE.md](../../SCOPE.md)
- [README.md](../../README.md)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
version: 1
updated: '2026-10-14'
domain: helix_forge
capabilities:
- id: capability.security.ssh-certificate-issuance
name: Decision-bound SSH certificates
summary: warden sign with local and OpenBao backends and adm/agt/atm actors.
domain: helix_forge
status: draft
owner: ops-warden
tags:
- ssh
- certificate
- ca
- ops-warden
- openbao
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D4 / A3 / C3 / R2
path: registry/capabilities/capability.security.ssh-certificate-issuance.md
consumption_modes:
- library
- CLI
- id: capability.security.access-routing
name: Credential routing and contained access
summary: warden route and access catalog; exact lane conduit and secret-exec routing.
domain: infotech
status: draft
owner: ops-warden
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A3 / C1 / R0
path: registry/capabilities/capability.security.access-routing.md
consumption_modes:
- library
- CLI
- id: capability.security.case-follow-through
name: Security case operational follow-through
summary: KnownSecurityCase route, plan and operational receipts.
domain: infotech
status: draft
owner: ops-warden
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A2 / C1 / R0
path: registry/capabilities/capability.security.case-follow-through.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source

View file

@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
---
id: capability.security.policy-publication
owner: policy-nexus
status: draft
domain: infotech
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D5
confidence: medium
rationale: Owner scope, neighboring responsibilities, concrete use cases and limitations
are documented; no exhaustive or generalized maturity claim.
availability:
current: A2
target: A2
confidence: medium
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: Generated immutable publication,
source currency and stable policy URLs. Availability describes the delivery
form, not production acceptance. Publication does not ratify policy or enforce
it.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C1
confidence: low
basis: Source artifacts establish a bounded capability; no independent consumer-completeness
assessment in this review.
reliability:
level: R0
confidence: low
basis: No longitudinal consumer reliability measurement established by this review.
name: Policy publication with source provenance
summary: Generated immutable publication, source currency and stable policy URLs.
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
discovery:
intent: Generated immutable publication, source currency and stable policy URLs
includes:
- Generated immutable publication, source currency and stable policy URLs
excludes:
- Publication does not ratify policy or enforce it
use_cases:
- 'U01: Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and
case types'
- 'U09: Maintainer observes posture, prioritizes findings, coordinates work and
verifies outcomes'
- 'U14: Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference
compositions'
availability:
current_level: A2
target_level: A2
current_artifacts:
- README.md
- docs/publication-contract.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
relations:
related_to:
- capability.security.iam-tooling-suite
- capability.security.practice-canon
- capability.security.risk-register
evidence:
documentation:
- README.md
- docs/publication-contract.md
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and case
types
- Maintainer observes posture, prioritizes findings, coordinates work and verifies
outcomes
- Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference
compositions
not_recommended_for:
- Publication does not ratify policy or enforce it
known_limitations:
- Publication does not ratify policy or enforce it
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
---
# Policy publication with source provenance
Generated immutable publication, source currency and stable policy URLs.
## Reuse boundary
Publication does not ratify policy or enforce it.
## Supported use cases
- U01: Architect composes a security deployment from explicit owner contracts and case types
- U09: Maintainer observes posture, prioritizes findings, coordinates work and verifies outcomes
- U14: Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference compositions
## Evidence and integration
- [README.md](../../README.md)
- [docs/publication-contract.md](../../docs/publication-contract.md)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
version: 1
domain: infotech
capabilities:
- id: capability.security.policy-publication
name: Policy publication with source provenance
summary: Generated immutable publication, source currency and stable policy URLs.
domain: infotech
status: draft
owner: policy-nexus
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A2 / C1 / R0
path: registry/capabilities/capability.security.policy-publication.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
updated: '2026-10-14'

View file

@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
---
id: capability.railiance.kubernetes-rail
owner: rail-kubernetes
status: draft
domain: infotech
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D5
confidence: medium
rationale: Owner scope, neighboring responsibilities, concrete use cases and limitations
are documented; no exhaustive or generalized maturity claim.
availability:
current: A2
target: A2
confidence: medium
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: Workload declaration, rollout,
observe, promote and rollback surfaces. Availability describes the delivery
form, not production acceptance. Compatibility extraction remains; not cluster
or application-domain ownership.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C1
confidence: low
basis: Source artifacts establish a bounded capability; no independent consumer-completeness
assessment in this review.
reliability:
level: R0
confidence: low
basis: No longitudinal consumer reliability measurement established by this review.
name: Generic Kubernetes workload lifecycle
summary: Workload declaration, rollout, observe, promote and rollback surfaces.
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
discovery:
intent: Workload declaration, rollout, observe, promote and rollback surfaces
includes:
- Workload declaration, rollout, observe, promote and rollback surfaces
excludes:
- Compatibility extraction remains; not cluster or application-domain ownership
use_cases:
- 'U13: Platform owner deploys and rolls back a workload with explicit substrate
and custody bindings'
- 'U14: Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference
compositions'
availability:
current_level: A2
target_level: A2
current_artifacts:
- SCOPE.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
relations:
related_to:
- capability.security.iam-tooling-suite
evidence:
documentation:
- SCOPE.md
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Platform owner deploys and rolls back a workload with explicit substrate and custody
bindings
- Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference
compositions
not_recommended_for:
- Compatibility extraction remains; not cluster or application-domain ownership
known_limitations:
- Compatibility extraction remains; not cluster or application-domain ownership
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
---
# Generic Kubernetes workload lifecycle
Workload declaration, rollout, observe, promote and rollback surfaces.
## Reuse boundary
Compatibility extraction remains; not cluster or application-domain ownership.
## Supported use cases
- U13: Platform owner deploys and rolls back a workload with explicit substrate and custody bindings
- U14: Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference compositions
## Evidence and integration
- [SCOPE.md](../../SCOPE.md)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
version: 1
domain: infotech
capabilities:
- id: capability.railiance.kubernetes-rail
name: Generic Kubernetes workload lifecycle
summary: Workload declaration, rollout, observe, promote and rollback surfaces.
domain: infotech
status: draft
owner: rail-kubernetes
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A2 / C1 / R0
path: registry/capabilities/capability.railiance.kubernetes-rail.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
updated: '2026-10-14'

View file

@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
---
id: capability.railiance.workload-deployment-tooling
name: Workload release configuration and guards
summary: Helm/manifests, exact image pins, application runbooks and rollout/rollback.
owner: railiance-apps
status: draft
domain: financials
tags:
- railiance
- kubernetes
- helm
- deployment
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D4
confidence: medium
rationale: SCOPE.md places this repo precisely in the Railiance OAS Stack layering
(S5), scoped to application Helm releases, workload manifests, and operator
runbooks for user-facing services such as vergabe-teilnahme.
availability:
current: A2
target: A3
confidence: medium
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: Helm/manifests, exact image
pins, application runbooks and rollout/rollback. Availability describes the
delivery form, not production acceptance. Release settings depend on underlying
platform and workload owners.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C1
confidence: low
basis: scope_vs_intent_and_consumer_expectations
satisfied_expectations:
- Helm charts and Kubernetes manifests for application workloads
- smoke-test and dry-run check scripts, including a forgejo-smoke.sh already ahead
of the platform-wide Forgejo transition
broken_expectations: []
out_of_scope_expectations: []
reliability:
level: R1
confidence: low
basis: consumer_quality_signals
known_reliability_risks:
- no top-level packaging; tooling is a collection of shell scripts under tools/
discovery:
intent: Helm/manifests, exact image pins, application runbooks and rollout/rollback
includes:
- Helm/manifests, exact image pins, application runbooks and rollout/rollback
excludes:
- Release settings depend on underlying platform and workload owners
assumptions: []
use_cases:
- 'U12: Developer builds and publishes through controlled source, dependency and
runner paths'
- 'U13: Platform owner deploys and rolls back a workload with explicit substrate
and custody bindings'
research_memos: []
availability:
current_level: A2
target_level: A3
current_artifacts:
- SCOPE.md
target_artifacts: []
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
relations:
depends_on: []
supports: []
related_to:
- capability.security.iam-tooling-suite
evidence:
documentation:
- SCOPE.md
tests:
- tools/forgejo-smoke.sh
- tools/inter-hub-smoke.sh
- tools/k8s-server-dry-run.sh
consumer_feedback: []
bug_reports: []
incidents: []
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Developer builds and publishes through controlled source, dependency and runner
paths
- Platform owner deploys and rolls back a workload with explicit substrate and custody
bindings
not_recommended_for:
- Release settings depend on underlying platform and workload owners
known_limitations:
- Release settings depend on underlying platform and workload owners
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
promotion_history: []
---
# Workload release configuration and guards
Helm/manifests, exact image pins, application runbooks and rollout/rollback.
## Reuse boundary
Release settings depend on underlying platform and workload owners.
## Supported use cases
- U12: Developer builds and publishes through controlled source, dependency and runner paths
- U13: Platform owner deploys and rolls back a workload with explicit substrate and custody bindings
## Evidence and integration
- [SCOPE.md](../../SCOPE.md)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
version: 1
updated: '2026-10-14'
domain: helix_forge
capabilities:
- id: capability.railiance.workload-deployment-tooling
name: Workload release configuration and guards
summary: Helm/manifests, exact image pins, application runbooks and rollout/rollback.
domain: financials
status: draft
owner: railiance-apps
tags:
- railiance
- kubernetes
- helm
- deployment
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A2 / C1 / R1
path: registry/capabilities/capability.railiance.workload-deployment-tooling.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source

View file

@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
---
id: capability.railiance.bootstrap-sequencing
owner: railiance-bootstrap
status: draft
domain: infotech
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D5
confidence: medium
rationale: Owner scope, neighboring responsibilities, concrete use cases and limitations
are documented; no exhaustive or generalized maturity claim.
availability:
current: A0
target: A0
confidence: medium
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: Bare-VM to estate sequence and
handoff contract. Availability describes the delivery form, not production acceptance.
End-to-end unattended rebuild is not established.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C1
confidence: low
basis: Source artifacts establish a bounded capability; no independent consumer-completeness
assessment in this review.
reliability:
level: R0
confidence: low
basis: No longitudinal consumer reliability measurement established by this review.
name: Bootstrap sequencing contracts
summary: Bare-VM to estate sequence and handoff contract.
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
discovery:
intent: Bare-VM to estate sequence and handoff contract
includes:
- Bare-VM to estate sequence and handoff contract
excludes:
- End-to-end unattended rebuild is not established
use_cases:
- 'U10: Operator recovers identity, custody or data with independently held recovery
material'
- 'U14: Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference
compositions'
availability:
current_level: A0
target_level: A0
current_artifacts:
- SCOPE.md
consumption_modes:
- informational
relations:
related_to:
- capability.security.iam-tooling-suite
evidence:
documentation:
- SCOPE.md
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Operator recovers identity, custody or data with independently held recovery material
- Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference
compositions
not_recommended_for:
- End-to-end unattended rebuild is not established
known_limitations:
- End-to-end unattended rebuild is not established
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
---
# Bootstrap sequencing contracts
Bare-VM to estate sequence and handoff contract.
## Reuse boundary
End-to-end unattended rebuild is not established.
## Supported use cases
- U10: Operator recovers identity, custody or data with independently held recovery material
- U14: Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference compositions
## Evidence and integration
- [SCOPE.md](../../SCOPE.md)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
version: 1
updated: '2026-10-14'
domain: helix_forge
capabilities:
- id: capability.railiance.bootstrap-sequencing
name: Bootstrap sequencing contracts
summary: Bare-VM to estate sequence and handoff contract.
domain: infotech
status: draft
owner: railiance-bootstrap
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A0 / C1 / R0
path: registry/capabilities/capability.railiance.bootstrap-sequencing.md
consumption_modes:
- informational

View file

@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
---
id: capability.railiance.cluster-bootstrap
name: Kubernetes runtime and cluster controls
summary: k3s, ingress, CNI, operators and kubeconfig/runtime checks.
owner: railiance-cluster
status: draft
domain: financials
tags:
- railiance
- kubernetes
- iac
- bootstrap
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D4
confidence: medium
rationale: README documents the 'Rails for Ops' convention-over-configuration
philosophy and a concrete quick-start (clone, from two bare servers rebuild
a full k8s environment); has .forgejo CI already in place.
availability:
current: A2
target: A3
confidence: medium
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: k3s, ingress, CNI, operators
and kubeconfig/runtime checks. Availability describes the delivery form, not
production acceptance. Single-node runtime and workload recovery are distinct
from bootstrap success.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C1
confidence: low
basis: scope_vs_intent_and_consumer_expectations
satisfied_expectations:
- documented quick-start from two bare servers to a running Kubernetes environment
- bootstrap/harden ansible playbooks
broken_expectations: []
out_of_scope_expectations: []
reliability:
level: R0
confidence: low
basis: consumer_quality_signals
known_reliability_risks:
- reproducibility claims not independently re-verified (no live bootstrap run
during this sweep)
discovery:
intent: k3s, ingress, CNI, operators and kubeconfig/runtime checks
includes:
- k3s, ingress, CNI, operators and kubeconfig/runtime checks
excludes:
- Single-node runtime and workload recovery are distinct from bootstrap success
assumptions: []
use_cases:
- 'U10: Operator recovers identity, custody or data with independently held recovery
material'
- 'U13: Platform owner deploys and rolls back a workload with explicit substrate
and custody bindings'
research_memos: []
availability:
current_level: A2
target_level: A3
current_artifacts:
- SCOPE.md
target_artifacts: []
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
relations:
depends_on: []
supports: []
related_to:
- capability.security.iam-tooling-suite
evidence:
documentation:
- SCOPE.md
tests:
- tests/
- .forgejo/
consumer_feedback: []
bug_reports: []
incidents: []
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Operator recovers identity, custody or data with independently held recovery material
- Platform owner deploys and rolls back a workload with explicit substrate and custody
bindings
not_recommended_for:
- Single-node runtime and workload recovery are distinct from bootstrap success
known_limitations:
- Single-node runtime and workload recovery are distinct from bootstrap success
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
promotion_history: []
---
# Kubernetes runtime and cluster controls
k3s, ingress, CNI, operators and kubeconfig/runtime checks.
## Reuse boundary
Single-node runtime and workload recovery are distinct from bootstrap success.
## Supported use cases
- U10: Operator recovers identity, custody or data with independently held recovery material
- U13: Platform owner deploys and rolls back a workload with explicit substrate and custody bindings
## Evidence and integration
- [SCOPE.md](../../SCOPE.md)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
version: 1
updated: '2026-10-14'
domain: helix_forge
capabilities:
- id: capability.railiance.cluster-bootstrap
name: Kubernetes runtime and cluster controls
summary: k3s, ingress, CNI, operators and kubeconfig/runtime checks.
domain: financials
status: draft
owner: railiance-cluster
tags:
- railiance
- kubernetes
- iac
- bootstrap
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A2 / C1 / R0
path: registry/capabilities/capability.railiance.cluster-bootstrap.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source

View file

@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
---
id: capability.railiance.ci-enablement
name: Developer delivery and CI templates
summary: Reusable CI workflows, build and deployment patterns.
owner: railiance-enablement
status: draft
domain: financials
tags:
- railiance
- ci-cd
- developer-enablement
- forgejo
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D4
confidence: medium
rationale: SCOPE.md places this repo precisely at S4 in the Railiance OAS Stack,
explicitly scoped to reusable CI/CD templates and enablement tooling while using
(not owning) forge capabilities.
availability:
current: A2
target: A3
confidence: high
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: Reusable CI workflows, build
and deployment patterns. Availability describes the delivery form, not production
acceptance. Templates do not prove mandatory checks or runner isolation.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C2
confidence: low
basis: scope_vs_intent_and_consumer_expectations
satisfied_expectations:
- reusable Forgejo Actions CI/CD workflow templates already in production shape
- a repo-promotion-to-forgejo script directly usable for the platform-wide forge
transition
broken_expectations: []
out_of_scope_expectations: []
reliability:
level: R1
confidence: low
basis: consumer_quality_signals
known_reliability_risks:
- templates are workflow YAML, not a packaged/versioned artifact; consumption
is copy/reference rather than dependency-managed
discovery:
intent: Reusable CI workflows, build and deployment patterns
includes:
- Reusable CI workflows, build and deployment patterns
excludes:
- Templates do not prove mandatory checks or runner isolation
assumptions: []
use_cases:
- 'U12: Developer builds and publishes through controlled source, dependency and
runner paths'
- 'U14: Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference
compositions'
research_memos: []
availability:
current_level: A2
target_level: A3
current_artifacts:
- SCOPE.md
target_artifacts: []
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
relations:
depends_on: []
supports: []
related_to:
- capability.security.iam-tooling-suite
evidence:
documentation:
- SCOPE.md
tests:
- workflows/ci-smoke.yaml
consumer_feedback: []
bug_reports: []
incidents: []
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Developer builds and publishes through controlled source, dependency and runner
paths
- Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference
compositions
not_recommended_for:
- Templates do not prove mandatory checks or runner isolation
known_limitations:
- Templates do not prove mandatory checks or runner isolation
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
promotion_history: []
---
# Developer delivery and CI templates
Reusable CI workflows, build and deployment patterns.
## Reuse boundary
Templates do not prove mandatory checks or runner isolation.
## Supported use cases
- U12: Developer builds and publishes through controlled source, dependency and runner paths
- U14: Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference compositions
## Evidence and integration
- [SCOPE.md](../../SCOPE.md)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
version: 1
updated: '2026-10-14'
domain: helix_forge
capabilities:
- id: capability.railiance.ci-enablement
name: Developer delivery and CI templates
summary: Reusable CI workflows, build and deployment patterns.
domain: financials
status: draft
owner: railiance-enablement
tags:
- railiance
- ci-cd
- developer-enablement
- forgejo
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A2 / C2 / R1
path: registry/capabilities/capability.railiance.ci-enablement.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source

View file

@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
---
id: capability.railiance.fabric-graph
name: Infrastructure ownership and dependency graph
summary: Schemas, validation, graph queries and State Hub exports.
owner: railiance-fabric
status: draft
domain: financials
tags:
- railiance
- graph
- ownership
- discovery
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D5
confidence: medium
rationale: README and SCOPE.md document the ecosystem graph model bounded by financial/operational
accountability (who pays, who is accountable), with king/lord/tenant ownership
concepts referenced in docs/FabricDiscoveryAndUpdate.md.
availability:
current: A2
target: A3
confidence: medium
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: Schemas, validation, graph queries
and State Hub exports. Availability describes the delivery form, not production
acceptance. Graph assertions need current owner evidence; not an enforcement
registry.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C1
confidence: low
basis: scope_vs_intent_and_consumer_expectations
satisfied_expectations:
- ecosystem graph declaration loader and validator
- schemas for services/machines/repos/deployables/endpoints/ownership/dependencies/bindings
broken_expectations: []
out_of_scope_expectations: []
reliability:
level: R0
confidence: low
basis: consumer_quality_signals
known_reliability_risks:
- discovery/rebuild/update-loop architecture documented as still evolving per
docs/FabricDiscoveryAndUpdate.md
discovery:
intent: Schemas, validation, graph queries and State Hub exports
includes:
- Schemas, validation, graph queries and State Hub exports
excludes:
- Graph assertions need current owner evidence; not an enforcement registry
assumptions: []
use_cases:
- 'U09: Maintainer observes posture, prioritizes findings, coordinates work and
verifies outcomes'
- 'U13: Platform owner deploys and rolls back a workload with explicit substrate
and custody bindings'
- 'U14: Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference
compositions'
research_memos: []
availability:
current_level: A2
target_level: A3
current_artifacts:
- SCOPE.md
target_artifacts: []
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
relations:
depends_on: []
supports: []
related_to:
- capability.security.iam-tooling-suite
evidence:
documentation:
- SCOPE.md
tests:
- tests/
consumer_feedback: []
bug_reports: []
incidents: []
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Maintainer observes posture, prioritizes findings, coordinates work and verifies
outcomes
- Platform owner deploys and rolls back a workload with explicit substrate and custody
bindings
- Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference
compositions
not_recommended_for:
- Graph assertions need current owner evidence; not an enforcement registry
known_limitations:
- Graph assertions need current owner evidence; not an enforcement registry
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
promotion_history:
- date: '2026-10-14'
dimension: availability
from: A1
to: A2
rationale: Interface-form reassessment from current owner sources; no completeness/reliability
promotion.
author: codex
---
# Infrastructure ownership and dependency graph
Schemas, validation, graph queries and State Hub exports.
## Reuse boundary
Graph assertions need current owner evidence; not an enforcement registry.
## Supported use cases
- U09: Maintainer observes posture, prioritizes findings, coordinates work and verifies outcomes
- U13: Platform owner deploys and rolls back a workload with explicit substrate and custody bindings
- U14: Framework adopter validates and reuses selected contracts, tools and reference compositions
## Evidence and integration
- [SCOPE.md](../../SCOPE.md)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
version: 1
updated: '2026-10-14'
domain: helix_forge
capabilities:
- id: capability.railiance.fabric-graph
name: Infrastructure ownership and dependency graph
summary: Schemas, validation, graph queries and State Hub exports.
domain: financials
status: draft
owner: railiance-fabric
tags:
- railiance
- graph
- ownership
- discovery
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A2 / C1 / R0
path: registry/capabilities/capability.railiance.fabric-graph.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source

View file

@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
---
id: capability.railiance.forge-infrastructure
name: Source forge, registries and runner substrate
summary: Forgejo operation, package registries and runner lifecycle.
owner: railiance-forge
status: draft
domain: financials
tags:
- railiance
- forgejo
- forge
- ci-runner
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D5
confidence: medium
rationale: README and SCOPE.md explicitly name 'current Gitea operation, future
Forgejo migration, container and package registries, Actions runner substrate,
artifact lifecycle' as the scope; status noted as 'active forge extraction'
with canonical registry operation docs already landed.
availability:
current: A2
target: A3
confidence: medium
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: Forgejo operation, package registries
and runner lifecycle. Availability describes the delivery form, not production
acceptance. Runner workload authority and independent verification coverage
remain open.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C1
confidence: low
basis: scope_vs_intent_and_consumer_expectations
satisfied_expectations:
- scope separation from railiance-apps/railiance-enablement documented
- canonical registry operation docs and runner ownership contracts
broken_expectations: []
out_of_scope_expectations: []
reliability:
level: R0
confidence: low
basis: consumer_quality_signals
known_reliability_risks:
- repo is actively being founded/extracted; no live deploy yet by its own account
- directly relevant to REUSE-WP-0019 but hasn't migrated its own CI to .forgejo/
yet
discovery:
intent: Forgejo operation, package registries and runner lifecycle
includes:
- Forgejo operation, package registries and runner lifecycle
excludes:
- Runner workload authority and independent verification coverage remain open
assumptions: []
use_cases:
- 'U12: Developer builds and publishes through controlled source, dependency and
runner paths'
research_memos: []
availability:
current_level: A2
target_level: A3
current_artifacts:
- SCOPE.md
- workplans/FORGE-WP-0006-independent-secret-detection.md
target_artifacts: []
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
relations:
depends_on: []
supports: []
related_to:
- capability.security.repository-secret-prevention
- capability.railiance.ci-enablement
- capability.railiance.workload-deployment-tooling
evidence:
documentation:
- SCOPE.md
- workplans/FORGE-WP-0006-independent-secret-detection.md
tests: []
consumer_feedback: []
bug_reports: []
incidents: []
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Developer builds and publishes through controlled source, dependency and runner
paths
not_recommended_for:
- Runner workload authority and independent verification coverage remain open
known_limitations:
- Runner workload authority and independent verification coverage remain open
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
promotion_history:
- date: '2026-10-14'
dimension: availability
from: A1
to: A2
rationale: Interface-form reassessment from current owner sources; no completeness/reliability
promotion.
author: codex
---
# Source forge, registries and runner substrate
Forgejo operation, package registries and runner lifecycle.
## Reuse boundary
Runner workload authority and independent verification coverage remain open.
## Supported use cases
- U12: Developer builds and publishes through controlled source, dependency and runner paths
## Evidence and integration
- [SCOPE.md](../../SCOPE.md)
- [workplans/FORGE-WP-0006-independent-secret-detection.md](../../workplans/FORGE-WP-0006-independent-secret-detection.md)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
---
id: capability.security.forge-secret-prevention
owner: railiance-forge
status: draft
domain: infotech
maturity:
discovery:
current: D3
target: D5
confidence: medium
rationale: Owner scope, neighboring responsibilities, concrete use cases and limitations
are documented; no exhaustive or generalized maturity claim.
availability:
current: A2
target: A2
confidence: medium
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: Pinned receive adapter, lifecycle
template and fail-closed scan. Availability describes the delivery form, not
production acceptance. Dated native coverage excludes one repo; import/mirror
fetch and response coverage remain separate.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C1
confidence: low
basis: Source artifacts establish a bounded capability; no independent consumer-completeness
assessment in this review.
reliability:
level: R0
confidence: low
basis: No longitudinal consumer reliability measurement established by this review.
name: Independent introduced-history secret prevention
summary: Pinned receive adapter, lifecycle template and fail-closed scan.
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
discovery:
intent: Pinned receive adapter, lifecycle template and fail-closed scan
includes:
- Pinned receive adapter, lifecycle template and fail-closed scan
excludes:
- Dated native coverage excludes one repo; import/mirror fetch and response coverage
remain separate
use_cases:
- 'U07: Owner inventories, rotates, revokes and detects exposure of credentials'
- 'U12: Developer builds and publishes through controlled source, dependency and
runner paths'
availability:
current_level: A2
target_level: A2
current_artifacts:
- workplans/FORGE-WP-0006-independent-secret-detection.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
relations:
related_to:
- capability.security.repository-secret-prevention
- capability.railiance.ci-enablement
- capability.railiance.workload-deployment-tooling
evidence:
documentation:
- workplans/FORGE-WP-0006-independent-secret-detection.md
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Owner inventories, rotates, revokes and detects exposure of credentials
- Developer builds and publishes through controlled source, dependency and runner
paths
not_recommended_for:
- Dated native coverage excludes one repo; import/mirror fetch and response coverage
remain separate
known_limitations:
- Dated native coverage excludes one repo; import/mirror fetch and response coverage
remain separate
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
---
# Independent introduced-history secret prevention
Pinned receive adapter, lifecycle template and fail-closed scan.
## Reuse boundary
Dated native coverage excludes one repo; import/mirror fetch and response coverage remain separate.
## Supported use cases
- U07: Owner inventories, rotates, revokes and detects exposure of credentials
- U12: Developer builds and publishes through controlled source, dependency and runner paths
## Evidence and integration
- [workplans/FORGE-WP-0006-independent-secret-detection.md](../../workplans/FORGE-WP-0006-independent-secret-detection.md)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
version: 1
updated: '2026-10-14'
domain: helix_forge
capabilities:
- id: capability.railiance.forge-infrastructure
name: Source forge, registries and runner substrate
summary: Forgejo operation, package registries and runner lifecycle.
domain: financials
status: draft
owner: railiance-forge
tags:
- railiance
- forgejo
- forge
- ci-runner
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A2 / C1 / R0
path: registry/capabilities/capability.railiance.forge-infrastructure.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
- id: capability.security.forge-secret-prevention
name: Independent introduced-history secret prevention
summary: Pinned receive adapter, lifecycle template and fail-closed scan.
domain: infotech
status: draft
owner: railiance-forge
tags:
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D3 / A2 / C1 / R0
path: registry/capabilities/capability.security.forge-secret-prevention.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source

View file

@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
---
id: capability.railiance.infra-provisioning
name: Host convergence and security baseline
summary: Ansible inventory, firewall, SSH bootstrap and baseline verification.
owner: railiance-infra
status: draft
domain: financials
tags:
- railiance
- terraform
- ansible
- infrastructure
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
maturity:
discovery:
current: D4
target: D5
confidence: high
rationale: README documents a complete, concrete quickstart (clone, prerequisites,
SOPS/age secrets setup, provider setup, terraform apply, ansible convergence)
with a specific inventory file (`inventory/servers.yaml`) as source of truth
— an unusually complete operational README among the swept repos.
availability:
current: A2
target: A3
confidence: high
rationale: 'Source interface assessed 2026-10-14: Ansible inventory, firewall,
SSH bootstrap and baseline verification. Availability describes the delivery
form, not production acceptance. Current hosts differ from the retained Hetzner
provisioning path.'
external_evidence:
completeness:
level: C2
confidence: low
basis: scope_vs_intent_and_consumer_expectations
satisfied_expectations:
- documented end-to-end quickstart from bare cloud account to converged servers
- SOPS+age encrypted secrets with a documented key-custody model
- inventory/servers.yaml as explicit source of truth
broken_expectations: []
out_of_scope_expectations: []
reliability:
level: R1
confidence: low
basis: consumer_quality_signals
known_reliability_risks:
- reproducibility not independently re-verified via a live provisioning run in
this sweep
discovery:
intent: Ansible inventory, firewall, SSH bootstrap and baseline verification
includes:
- Ansible inventory, firewall, SSH bootstrap and baseline verification
excludes:
- Current hosts differ from the retained Hetzner provisioning path
assumptions: []
use_cases:
- 'U06: Operator or automation obtains a bounded SSH certificate and maintains private
connectivity'
- 'U10: Operator recovers identity, custody or data with independently held recovery
material'
- 'U13: Platform owner deploys and rolls back a workload with explicit substrate
and custody bindings'
research_memos: []
availability:
current_level: A2
target_level: A3
current_artifacts:
- SCOPE.md
target_artifacts: []
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source
relations:
depends_on: []
supports: []
related_to:
- capability.security.iam-tooling-suite
evidence:
documentation:
- SCOPE.md
tests:
- sbom-tools.yaml
- .forgejo/
consumer_feedback: []
bug_reports: []
incidents: []
consumer_guidance:
recommended_for:
- Operator or automation obtains a bounded SSH certificate and maintains private
connectivity
- Operator recovers identity, custody or data with independently held recovery material
- Platform owner deploys and rolls back a workload with explicit substrate and custody
bindings
not_recommended_for:
- Current hosts differ from the retained Hetzner provisioning path
known_limitations:
- Current hosts differ from the retained Hetzner provisioning path
- 2026-10-14 architecture review estimates operational maturity separately; a registry
entry does not authorize execution or establish deployment.
promotion_history: []
---
# Host convergence and security baseline
Ansible inventory, firewall, SSH bootstrap and baseline verification.
## Reuse boundary
Current hosts differ from the retained Hetzner provisioning path.
## Supported use cases
- U06: Operator or automation obtains a bounded SSH certificate and maintains private connectivity
- U10: Operator recovers identity, custody or data with independently held recovery material
- U13: Platform owner deploys and rolls back a workload with explicit substrate and custody bindings
## Evidence and integration
- [SCOPE.md](../../SCOPE.md)
Assessment: CUST-WP-0081, 2026-10-14. Relations identify interfaces to compose; they do not certify native integration. Existing external evidence levels are retained where present. New entries use conservative C1/R0 until consumer assessment exists.

View file

@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
version: 1
updated: '2026-10-14'
domain: helix_forge
capabilities:
- id: capability.railiance.infra-provisioning
name: Host convergence and security baseline
summary: Ansible inventory, firewall, SSH bootstrap and baseline verification.
domain: financials
status: draft
owner: railiance-infra
tags:
- railiance
- terraform
- ansible
- infrastructure
- security
- netkingdom
- framework-reuse
vector: D4 / A2 / C2 / R1
path: registry/capabilities/capability.railiance.infra-provisioning.md
consumption_modes:
- CLI
- source