CUST-WP-0060 finished: closure review + stage-3 seed (7/7 tasks done)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
dec8c0413b
commit
6db7497e07
1 changed files with 54 additions and 8 deletions
|
|
@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ id: CUST-WP-0060
|
|||
type: workplan
|
||||
title: "Work-record canonization — unified ontology, stages 1–2"
|
||||
domain: infotech
|
||||
status: ready
|
||||
status: finished
|
||||
owner: codex
|
||||
topic_slug: custodian
|
||||
planning_priority: high
|
||||
|
|
@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Yellow lane (preparation); resolution founder-only.
|
|||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: CUST-WP-0060-T01
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
status: done
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "90de8017-436e-4251-ae64-904a6f617623"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
|
@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ list if needed. Green lane.
|
|||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: CUST-WP-0060-T02
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
status: done
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "772a1777-d90f-4d13-9966-50344287db10"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
|
@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ legacy patterns (AWQ-/DEC-/OH-). Green lane.
|
|||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: CUST-WP-0060-T03
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
status: done
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "c394bde6-dc8b-4ce6-97b8-a73b3cab300a"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
|
@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ Must be fast (<5 s), zero-config when the repo has no records. Blue lane.
|
|||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: CUST-WP-0060-T04
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
status: done
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "b5f03759-c285-4b83-9037-fdf0ac669274"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
|
@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ governance.
|
|||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: CUST-WP-0060-T05
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
status: done
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "43bcef67-c3e9-48e2-8de0-5cbd2f85c175"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
|
@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ commits).
|
|||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: CUST-WP-0060-T06
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
status: done
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "7edac718-b659-4708-9868-b6c44364a928"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
|
@ -131,7 +131,53 @@ detector findings across the fleet. Green lane.
|
|||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: CUST-WP-0060-T07
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
status: done
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "e27e7d69-c51d-48c0-8a82-57a198e0a668"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Closure Review — 2026-07-20
|
||||
|
||||
**Outcome:** All 7 tasks completed same-day; stages 1–2 delivered end-to-end
|
||||
with green proof runs.
|
||||
|
||||
### Completed
|
||||
- T01 — canon ratified (founder, no edits; hub decision `f4640f9e`); both
|
||||
standards + machine registry flipped to `active`.
|
||||
- T02 — `workplan-terminology-fleet` v0.2 addendum (umbrella vocabulary;
|
||||
file keeps `_v0.1` name for reference stability).
|
||||
- T03 — JSON schemas: `canon/standards/schemas/work-records/`
|
||||
(spine/intake/decision/engagement; conditional spine requirements,
|
||||
historical grace for terminal records).
|
||||
- T04 — `tools/validate_work_records.py` + reusable Forgejo workflow
|
||||
(repo-seed `work-records.yaml`). Substrate lesson: ubuntu-latest =
|
||||
node:20-bookworm, python via apt (first run failed 127, fixed).
|
||||
- T05 — sidetrack detector landed as **C-31** (C-25 was taken — the
|
||||
workplan text said C-25; registry numbering, not this plan, is
|
||||
authoritative). Unit-verified: rogue id flagged, grandfathered id passes.
|
||||
- T06 — binky-control pilot green: 45 records, 0 errors, 0 warnings,
|
||||
**zero id renames**; CI run #1751 success. Registry additions during
|
||||
pilot: legacy task variants `-T1`, `-LEGACY-Txx`.
|
||||
- T07 — this review.
|
||||
|
||||
### Evidence
|
||||
- Local runs: the-custodian 384 records / binky-control 45 records clean.
|
||||
- CI: binky-control Work Records run 1747 (fail, substrate) → 1751 (green).
|
||||
- fix-consistency on binky-control with C-31: 0 sidetrack warnings.
|
||||
|
||||
### Stage-3 successor seed (next workplan, state-hub + the-custodian)
|
||||
1. **Intake entity** in state-hub (fresh table per founder decision;
|
||||
UUIDv7 keys), fix-consistency registration for intake/decision/
|
||||
engagement kinds (the write-back fields `state_hub_intake_id` etc. are
|
||||
already in the schemas).
|
||||
2. **Promotion transition** as one CLI/MCP call (`intake.routed →
|
||||
workplan|task|decision|engagement` with `promoted_to`/`origin`
|
||||
back-links, both files written, both synced).
|
||||
3. **Generated per-repo work-record index** (transclusion-style; markitect
|
||||
involvement) + regeneration of binky queue view tails as `[auto]`.
|
||||
4. Friction observations for stage 3: schema authoring cost was near zero
|
||||
for existing binky items (they passed unmodified); the only true churn
|
||||
risk is the view/authored split — keep authored blocks where they are,
|
||||
generate *around* them.
|
||||
5. Suggestion-table close-out (read-only legacy) once the intake entity is
|
||||
live.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue