CUST-WP-0060 finished: closure review + stage-3 seed (7/7 tasks done)
All checks were successful
CI Smoke / host-smoke (push) Successful in 0s
CI Smoke / container-smoke (push) Successful in 3s

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
codex 2026-07-20 02:11:17 +02:00
parent dec8c0413b
commit 6db7497e07

View file

@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ id: CUST-WP-0060
type: workplan
title: "Work-record canonization — unified ontology, stages 12"
domain: infotech
status: ready
status: finished
owner: codex
topic_slug: custodian
planning_priority: high
@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Yellow lane (preparation); resolution founder-only.
```task
id: CUST-WP-0060-T01
status: todo
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "90de8017-436e-4251-ae64-904a6f617623"
```
@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ list if needed. Green lane.
```task
id: CUST-WP-0060-T02
status: todo
status: done
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "772a1777-d90f-4d13-9966-50344287db10"
```
@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ legacy patterns (AWQ-/DEC-/OH-). Green lane.
```task
id: CUST-WP-0060-T03
status: todo
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "c394bde6-dc8b-4ce6-97b8-a73b3cab300a"
```
@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ Must be fast (<5 s), zero-config when the repo has no records. Blue lane.
```task
id: CUST-WP-0060-T04
status: todo
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "b5f03759-c285-4b83-9037-fdf0ac669274"
```
@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ governance.
```task
id: CUST-WP-0060-T05
status: todo
status: done
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "43bcef67-c3e9-48e2-8de0-5cbd2f85c175"
```
@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ commits).
```task
id: CUST-WP-0060-T06
status: todo
status: done
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "7edac718-b659-4708-9868-b6c44364a928"
```
@ -131,7 +131,53 @@ detector findings across the fleet. Green lane.
```task
id: CUST-WP-0060-T07
status: todo
status: done
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "e27e7d69-c51d-48c0-8a82-57a198e0a668"
```
## Closure Review — 2026-07-20
**Outcome:** All 7 tasks completed same-day; stages 12 delivered end-to-end
with green proof runs.
### Completed
- T01 — canon ratified (founder, no edits; hub decision `f4640f9e`); both
standards + machine registry flipped to `active`.
- T02 — `workplan-terminology-fleet` v0.2 addendum (umbrella vocabulary;
file keeps `_v0.1` name for reference stability).
- T03 — JSON schemas: `canon/standards/schemas/work-records/`
(spine/intake/decision/engagement; conditional spine requirements,
historical grace for terminal records).
- T04 — `tools/validate_work_records.py` + reusable Forgejo workflow
(repo-seed `work-records.yaml`). Substrate lesson: ubuntu-latest =
node:20-bookworm, python via apt (first run failed 127, fixed).
- T05 — sidetrack detector landed as **C-31** (C-25 was taken — the
workplan text said C-25; registry numbering, not this plan, is
authoritative). Unit-verified: rogue id flagged, grandfathered id passes.
- T06 — binky-control pilot green: 45 records, 0 errors, 0 warnings,
**zero id renames**; CI run #1751 success. Registry additions during
pilot: legacy task variants `-T1`, `-LEGACY-Txx`.
- T07 — this review.
### Evidence
- Local runs: the-custodian 384 records / binky-control 45 records clean.
- CI: binky-control Work Records run 1747 (fail, substrate) → 1751 (green).
- fix-consistency on binky-control with C-31: 0 sidetrack warnings.
### Stage-3 successor seed (next workplan, state-hub + the-custodian)
1. **Intake entity** in state-hub (fresh table per founder decision;
UUIDv7 keys), fix-consistency registration for intake/decision/
engagement kinds (the write-back fields `state_hub_intake_id` etc. are
already in the schemas).
2. **Promotion transition** as one CLI/MCP call (`intake.routed →
workplan|task|decision|engagement` with `promoted_to`/`origin`
back-links, both files written, both synced).
3. **Generated per-repo work-record index** (transclusion-style; markitect
involvement) + regeneration of binky queue view tails as `[auto]`.
4. Friction observations for stage 3: schema authoring cost was near zero
for existing binky items (they passed unmodified); the only true churn
risk is the view/authored split — keep authored blocks where they are,
generate *around* them.
5. Suggestion-table close-out (read-only legacy) once the intake entity is
live.